[1]石骁昵,马宇熙,李 婷.UPLC-MS/MS法测定蔬菜中多菌灵含量的不确定度评估[J].医学信息,2020,33(03):162-164.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.03.054]
 SHI Xiao-ni,LI Ting,MA Yu-xi.Evaluation of Uncertainty in Determination of Carbendazim in Vegetables by UPLC-MS/MS[J].Medical Information,2020,33(03):162-164.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.03.054]
点击复制

UPLC-MS/MS法测定蔬菜中多菌灵含量的不确定度评估()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年03期
页码:
162-164
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2020-02-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation of Uncertainty in Determination of Carbendazim in Vegetables by UPLC-MS/MS
文章编号:
1006-1959(2020)03-0162-03
作者:
石骁昵马宇熙李 婷
(乌鲁木齐市疾病预防控制中心,乌鲁木齐 830026)
Author(s):
SHI Xiao-niLI TingMA Yu-xi
(Urumqi Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Urumqi 830026,Xinjiang,China)
关键词:
多菌灵蔬菜超高效液相色谱-质谱联用不确定度
Keywords:
CarbendazimVegetablesUltra performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry Uncertainty
分类号:
Q450.7
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.03.054
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究超高效液相色谱-质谱联用(UPLC-MS/MS)法测定蔬菜中多菌灵含量的不确定度。方法 色谱柱为Waters ACQUITY BEH C18,1.7μm,柱温:35℃;进样量5 μl;流动相:A为乙腈,B为0.05%甲酸水;流速:0.3 ml。梯度洗脱条件:0~5 min 30% A,70% B;5~6 min 95% A,5% B;6~7 min 30% A,70% B,采用多反应监测模式进行检测,对不确定来源进行分析,建立标准曲线模型,计算各变量的不确定度、合成不确定度、扩展不确定度。结果 超高效液相色谱-质谱联用法测定蔬菜中多菌灵含量的不确定度,影响最大的是标准溶液配制稀释过程中产生的不确定度。相对不确定度为0.233,在置信度为95%时,覆盖因子k=2,扩展不确定度为4.66%。结论 UPLC-MS/MS法测定多菌灵含量对测量不确定贡献最大的是标准溶液的配制和稀释过程中产生的不确定度,其次是标准曲线拟合时产生的不确定度。因此在实验过程中要严格操作规程,减少人为误差。
Abstract:
Objective To study the uncertainty of determination of carbendazim in vegetables by ultra performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Methods The chromatographic column was Waters ACQUITY BEH C18, 1.7 μm, column temperature: 35 °C; injection volume was 5 μl; mobile phase: A was acetonitrile, B was 0.05% formic acid water; flow rate: 0.3 ml.Gradient elution conditions: 0~5 min 30% A, 70% B; 5~6 min 95% A, 5% B; 6~7 min 30% A, 70% B. Multi-reaction monitoring mode was used for detection. Analyze the sources of uncertainty, establish a standard curve model, and calculate the uncertainty, synthetic uncertainty, and expanded uncertainty of each variable.Results The uncertainty of the determination of carbendazim in vegetables by ultra performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry combined with the most significant factor was the uncertainty generated during the preparation and dilution of standard solutions. The relative uncertainty is 0.233.When the confidence is 95%, the coverage factor k=2 and the expanded uncertainty is 4.66%.Conclusion The most significant contribution to the measurement uncertainty of the determination of carbendazim by the UPLC-MS/MS method is the uncertainty generated during the preparation and dilution of the standard solution, followed by the uncertainty generated during the fitting of the standard curve. Therefore, it is necessary to strictly operate procedures during the experiment to reduce human error.

参考文献/References:

[1]于功昌,王筱芬.苯并咪唑杀菌剂的雄性生殖毒性作用机制研究进展[J].职业与健康,2014,30(18):2661-2663,2669. [2]GB2763-2016食品安全国家标准食品中农药最大残留限量[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016. [3]董亚蕾,刘文婧,曹进,等.国内食品农药多残留检测技术的研究进展[J].分析试验室,2017,36(2):241-248. [4]蔡红梅,汪孟丽,田子玉.蔬菜中农药残留检测前处理方法概述[J].现代农业科技,2019(3):93-94. [5]刘洪斌,姚喜梅,蔡英华,等.应用QuEChERS检测鸡蛋中16种磺胺类药物残留UPLC-MS/MS方法的建立[J].畜牧与兽医,2016,48(2):7-12. [6]刘运明,刘华良,吉文亮,等.QuEChERS-高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定豆芽中7种植物生长调节剂的残留量[J].2015,25(12):1880-1883. [7]刘黎,邓可.气相色谱-质谱联用法测定番茄中腐霉利农药残留量的不确定度评定[J].农业与技术,2017,37(8):55-58. [8]潘城,胡朝阳,吴凌,等.高效液相色谱法测定蔬菜中异菌脲残留量的不确定度分析[J].食品科学,2017,38(24):235-240. [9]管阳凡,杨惠琴,郭德华.农药残留检测用联苯三唑醇和丙硫菌唑标准物质的定值与不确定度的评估[J].理化检验:化学分册,2019,46(1):91-96. [10]逄瑜,于新兰,李海芳,等.农药残留测定结果不确定度评定方法指南介绍[J].中国新药,2018,27(1):17-21. [11]国家技术监督检验检疫总局.测量不确定度评定与表示JJF 1059.1-2012[S].北京:中国质检出版社,2013. [12]国家质量监督检验检疫总局.化学分析测量不确定度评定:JJF1135-2005[S].北京:中国计量出版社,2005.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-02-01