[1]舒荣兵,潘小峰,孙 琦,等.改良持骨器与传统持骨器治疗长骨骨干骨折的疗效[J].医学信息,2020,33(07):119-120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.07.037]
　SHU Rong-bing,PAN Xiao-feng,SUN Qi,et al.Analysis of the Effect of Modified Bone-holding Device and Traditional Bone-holding Device on Long Bone Shaft Fracture[J].Medical Information,2020,33(07):119-120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.07.037]
点击复制

改良持骨器与传统持骨器治疗长骨骨干骨折的疗效()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年07期
页码:
119-120
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-04-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the Effect of Modified Bone-holding Device and Traditional Bone-holding Device on Long Bone Shaft Fracture
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）07-0119-02
作者:
舒荣兵; 潘小峰; 孙 琦; 等
（解放军联勤部第九0八医院<鹰潭营区>骨科，江西 鹰潭 335000）
Author(s):
SHU Rong-bing; PAN Xiao-feng; SUN Qi; et al
(Department of Orthopedics,the 908th HospitalPLA Joint Logistics Department,Yingtan 335000,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
改良持骨器; 长骨骨干; 骨折; 持骨器
Keywords:
Modified bone holding device; Long bone backbone; Fracture; Bone holding device
分类号:
R687.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.07.037
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察改良持骨器与传统持骨器治疗长骨骨干骨折临床疗效。方法 选择2016年5月~2019年6月在我院治疗的长骨骨干骨折患者90例，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各45例。对照组采用传统持骨器治疗，观察组采用改良持骨器治疗，比较两组临床治疗总有效率、手术时间、切口大小、术中出血量、愈合时间以及并发症发生情况。结果 观察组治疗总有效率（95.56%）高于对照组（84.44%），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组手术时间、切口大小、术中出血量、愈合时间均低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组并发生率（6.67%）与对照组（8.89%）比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 改良持骨器治疗长骨骨干骨折可有效提高临床治疗疗效，手术时间短，术中出血量少，切口小，术后恢复快，骨折愈合时间缩短，值得临床应用。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the clinical effect of modified bone-holding device and traditional bone-holding device in the treatment of long bone shaft fracture. Methods A total of 90 patients with long bone shaft fractures treated in our hospital from May 2016 to June 2019 were selected and divided into a control group and an observation group with a random number table method, each with 45 cases. The control group was treated with a traditional bone-holding device, and the observation group was treated with a modified bone-holding device. The total clinical effectiveness, operation time, incision size, intraoperative blood loss, healing time, and complications of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group (95.56%) was higher than that in the control group (84.44%), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the operation time, incision size, intraoperative blood loss, and healing time of the observation group were lower than the control group group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the incidence rate of the observation group (6.67%) compared with the control group (8.89%), the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion The improved bone-holding device for the treatment of long-bone shaft fracture can effectively improve the clinical therapeutic effect. The operation time is short, the intraoperative bleeding is small, the incision is small, the postoperative recovery is fast, and the fracture healing time is shortened. It is worthy of clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1]徐建民,宋绪栋.改良持骨器在四肢骨折钢板内固定术中的应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2015,13(20):1594-1595. [2]王飞达,高耀祖,苑伟,等.附加锁定加压钢板联合植骨治疗股骨干骨折髓内钉固定术后无菌性骨不连[J].中国骨伤,2014,27(10):815-818. [3]张明友,陈德元.多向分体式与传统三爪持骨器的临床疗效比较[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(13):86-89. [4]何建,李钧,陈波,等.附加单皮质锁定加压钢板治疗股骨干骨折髓内钉术后骨折不愈合的临床分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2015,20(6):1211-1212. [5]付梓新,刘开祥.新型持骨器与三爪持骨器治疗长骨干骨折疗效比较[J].医疗卫生装备,2009,30(8):80-81.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-01