[1]袁 雪,钱海燕.本院理血剂类中药注射剂临床使用合理性与药物利用研究[J].医学信息,2020,33(14):149-150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.14.046]
　YUAN Xue,QIAN Hai-yan.Study on the Rationality of Clinical Use and Drug Utilization of Blood-injecting Chinese Medicine Injections in Our Hospital[J].Medical Information,2020,33(14):149-150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.14.046]
点击复制

本院理血剂类中药注射剂临床使用合理性与药物利用研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年14期
页码:
149-150
栏目:
药物与临床
出版日期:
2020-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Rationality of Clinical Use and Drug Utilization of Blood-injecting Chinese Medicine Injections in Our Hospital
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）14-0149-02
作者:
袁 雪; 钱海燕
（南京中医药大学第二附属医院药学部，江苏 南京 210017）
Author(s):
YUAN Xue; QIAN Hai-yan
(Department of Pharmacy,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210017,Jiangsu,China)
关键词:
中药注射剂; 药物利用; 限定日剂量; 限定日浓度; 平均用药频度
Keywords:
Traditional Chinese medicine injection; Drug utilization; Limited daily dose;  Limited daily concentration; Average drug use frequency
分类号:
R287
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.14.046
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨理血剂类中药注射剂临床使用合理性与药物利用研究在药品中的风险评估。方法 抽取某医院2018年12月~2019年9月临床使用理血剂类中药注射剂120份，采用药品说明书推荐评价、药物利用研究等综合评价方法，探讨理血剂类中药注射剂在临床使用的合理性问题。结果 药品说明书推荐评价指标合理性百分比西医辨病（31.67%）、中医辨病（15.00%）、中医辨证（50.83%）3项评价指标合理性百分率相对偏低。4种中药注射剂中血塞通总体用药频度最高，总体用药强度最高；丹参注射液、注射用血塞通临床超剂量使用情况严重。结论 临床药师应加强该医院中药注射剂合理用药监测，尤其是中医辨病、中医辨证、溶媒选择、给药剂量以及浓度，在中药注射剂临床合理使用中发挥积极作用。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the rationality of the clinical use of blood-injection Chinese medicine injections and the risk assessment of drug utilization studies in medicines.Methods Extract 120 clinical injections of Chinese medicines for blood use in a hospital from December 2018 to September 2019, and use comprehensive evaluation methods such as drug label recommendations and drug utilization studies to discuss the rationality of the clinical use of Chinese medicines for blood preparations problem.Results The rationality percentage of the recommended evaluation indicators for drug inserts was relatively low for the three evaluation indicators (31.67%), TCM differentiation (15.00%), and TCM syndrome differentiation (50.83%).The rationality percentage of the three evaluation indicators is relatively low. Among the four kinds of traditional Chinese medicine injections, Xuesaitong has the highest overall frequency and the highest overall intensity ; Danshen injection, Xuesaitong for injection.The clinical overdose usage is serious.Conclusion The clinical pharmacist should strengthen the monitoring of the rational use of traditional Chinese medicine injections, especially the differentiation of traditional Chinese medicine, syndrome differentiation, solvent selection, dosage and concentration of administration, and play an active role in the rational use of traditional Chinese medicine injections.

参考文献/References:

[1]孙世光.中国已上市中药注射剂品种分析报告[J].中国医院药学杂志,2015,35(5):369-374.[2]李廷瑞,孙世光.热毒宁注射液临床使用合理性与安全性再评价研究[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2015,31(7):569-572.[3]李莉,宋海燕,孙世光.灯盏细辛注射液临床使用合理性与安全性再评价研究[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2015,31(15):1543-1545.[4]孙世光,孙蓉.药物利用研究在中药注射剂临床使用合理性与安全性再评价中的应用[J].中华中医药杂志,2015,30(5):1519-1524.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐 洁.重点监控管理对中药注射剂使用的影响[J].医学信息,2019,32(16):122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.16.039]
　XU Jie.The Impact of Key Monitoring and Management on the Use of Traditional Chinese Medicine Injections[J].Medical Information,2019,32(14):122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.16.039]
[2]林 荣,李二强.中药注射剂不良反应发生的原因分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(18):135.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.18.044]
　LIN Rong,LI Er-qiang.Analysis on the Causes of Adverse Reactions of Traditional Chinese Medicine Injections[J].Medical Information,2020,33(14):135.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.18.044]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01