[1]周姗姗.CT、磁共振成像与X线诊断脊椎骨折的诊断价值比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(08):173-174.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.08.048]
　ZHOU Shan-shan.Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of CT,MRI and X-ray in the Diagnosis of Vertebral Fractures[J].Medical Information,2021,34(08):173-174.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.08.048]
点击复制

CT、磁共振成像与X线诊断脊椎骨折的诊断价值比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年08期
页码:
173-174
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2021-04-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of CT,MRI and X-ray in the Diagnosis of Vertebral Fractures
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）08-0173-02
作者:
周姗姗
（江苏省启东市中医院放射科，江苏 启东 226200）
Author(s):
ZHOU Shan-shan
(Department of Radiology,Qidong Hospital of TCM,Qidong 226200,Jiangsu,China)
关键词:
脊椎骨折; 磁共振成像; X线; CT
Keywords:
Vertebral fracture; Magnetic resonance imaging; X-ray; CT
分类号:
R445
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.08.048
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较CT、磁共振成像与X线检查脊椎骨折的诊断价值。方法 回顾性分析2015年1月~2020年8月我院接收的55例脊椎骨折患者作为研究对象，均接受CT、磁共振成像及X线检查，根据病理检查诊断结果，比较3种检查方法的临床诊断准确率、敏感度及特异度差异。结果 CT、磁共振误诊及漏诊率低于X线检查，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。CT与磁共振的准确率、敏感度及特异度高于X线，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；CT与磁共振准确率、敏感度及特异度比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 CT与磁共振成像对脊椎骨折诊断准确率优于X线检查，为达到理想的临床诊断效果，可视患者病情合理选择临床检查手段。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the diagnostic value of CT, MRI and X-ray examination of vertebral fractures.Methods A retrospective analysis of 55 patients with vertebral fractures in our hospital from January 2015 to August 2020 as the research objects, all underwent CT, magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray examinations. According to the diagnosis results of pathological examinations,compare the differences in clinical diagnosis accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the three inspection methods.Results The misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis rates of CT and MRI were lower than those of X-ray examination,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of CT and MRI were higher than that of X-ray,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05);There was no statistically significant difference between CT and MRI in accuracy, sensitivity and specificity (P>0.05).Conclusion The accuracy of CT and MRI in the diagnosis of vertebral fractures is better than X-ray examination. In order to achieve the ideal clinical diagnosis effect, the clinical examination methods can be reasonably selected according to the patient’s condition.

参考文献/References:

[1]章雪芳,杨小彬,郝定均,等.胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折患者流行病学特点研究[J].中国全科医学,2019,22(11):45-49. [2]曹晓华.X线平片技术和多层螺旋CT三维重建技术在外伤性脊椎骨折诊断中的疗效差异分析[J].影像研究与医学应用,2020,4(10):111-112. [3]罗德军,杨博.X线平片和CT扫描在外伤性脊椎骨折部位及解剖学改变诊断中的应用[J].影像科学与光化学,2020,38(3):464-469. [4]刘成荫,戴燕彬.X线平片技术和多层螺旋CT三维重建技术在外伤性脊椎骨折诊断中的效果对比[J].现代医用影像学,2020,29(2):291-293. [5]刘冬雄,蔡碧红.基于外伤性脊椎骨折的多层螺旋CT三维重建技术与X线平片技术诊断效果对比[J].首都食品与医药,2019,26(21):89-90. [6]刘鑫,陈昆涛,刘建民,等.多层螺旋CT在脊椎骨折诊断中的准确率及临床价值分析[J].实用医技杂志,2019,26(9):1116-1118.

相似文献/References:

[1]雷少晖,张永海.脑氧代谢的影像学测定方法研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.015]
　LEI Shao-hui,ZHANG Yong-hai.Imaging Study of Brain Oxygen Metabolism[J].Medical Information,2018,31(08):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.015]
[2]管海生.膝关节剥脱性骨软骨炎MRI诊断[J].医学信息,2018,31(06):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.06.056]
　GUAN Hai-sheng.MRI Diagnosis of Exfoliative Osteochondritis in Knee Joint[J].Medical Information,2018,31(08):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.06.056]
[3]王国杰,梁日晶,刘 莹,等.3.0T磁共振扩散张量成像与扩散加权成像对单发大脑半球胶质瘤病理分级的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2022,35(09):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.026]
　WANG Guo-jie,LIANG Ri-jing,LIU Ying,et al.Diagnostic Value of 3.0T Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Pathological Grading of Single Cerebral Hemispheric Glioma[J].Medical Information,2022,35(08):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.026]
[4]张 虎,张 涛,徐 芳,等.MRI在乳腺癌诊治中的研究进展[J].医学信息,2022,35(10):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.10.015]
　ZHANG Hu,ZHANG Tao,XU Fang,et al.Research Progress of MRI in Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer[J].Medical Information,2022,35(08):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.10.015]
[5]孔俊沣,钟 雯,刘 嵩,等.MRI对卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2022,35(11):165.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.044]
　KONG Jun-feng,ZHONG Wen,LIU Song,et al.The Diagnostic Value of MRI in Ovarian Endometriotic Cyst[J].Medical Information,2022,35(08):165.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.044]
[6]刘 钢,李志伟,田 晞,等.磁共振检查对冯·希佩尔·林道综合征诊断的意义[J].医学信息,2018,31(18):145.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.047]
　LIU Gang,LI Zhi-wei,TIAN Xi,et al.The Significance of Magnetic Resonance Examination in the Diagnosis of Von Hippel-Lindau Disease[J].Medical Information,2018,31(08):145.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.047]
[7]马平平,程宇琪,许秀峰,等.抑郁症脑磁共振成像与抗抑郁治疗临床改善间关系的研究进展[J].医学信息,2018,31(24):31.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.009]
　MA Ping-ping,CHENG Yu-qi,XU Xiu-feng,et al.Advances in Research on the Relationship between Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Improvement of Antidepressant Therapy[J].Medical Information,2018,31(08):31.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.009]
[8]刘姗灵,冉 冉,涂 刚.乳腺Paget′s 病诊断与治疗相关研究进展[J].医学信息,2019,32(07):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.001]
　LIU Shan-ling,RAN Ran,TU Gang.Advances in Research on Diagnosis and Treatment of Paget's Disease in Breast[J].Medical Information,2019,32(08):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.001]
[9]蔡 彬,黄 伟,储正达,等.直肠腔内超声与相控阵线圈磁共振在直肠癌术前局部分期中的Meta分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(10):70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.024]
　CAI Bin,HUANG Wei,CHU Zheng-da,et al.Meta-analysis of Intra-rectal Ultrasound and Phased-array Magnetic Resonance in the Preoperative Partial Phase of Rectal Cancer[J].Medical Information,2019,32(08):70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.024]
[10]王 刚,余芬芬,吴依芬,等.基于MRI成像的影像组学特征识别肺癌肺外转移特性的价值[J].医学信息,2022,35(14):41.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.14.008]
　WANG Gang,YU Fen-fen,WU Yi-fen,et al.Value of Radiomic Features Based on MRI in Identifying Extrapulmonary Metastasis of Lung Cancer[J].Medical Information,2022,35(08):41.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.14.008]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01