[1]刘国旗.生物反馈电刺激治疗对不同分娩方式患者的疗效及对盆底肌力的影响[J].医学信息,2021,34(19):133-135.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.19.035]
　LIU Guo-qi.Effect of Biofeedback Electrical Stimulation on Patients with Different Delivery Modes andits Effect on Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength[J].Medical Information,2021,34(19):133-135.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.19.035]
点击复制

生物反馈电刺激治疗对不同分娩方式患者的疗效及对盆底肌力的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年19期
页码:
133-135
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-10-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Biofeedback Electrical Stimulation on Patients with Different Delivery Modes andits Effect on Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）19-0133-03
作者:
刘国旗
天津蓟州区人民医院产科，天津 301900
Author(s):
LIU Guo-qi
Department of Obstetrics,Tianjin Jizhou District People’s Hospital,Tianjin 301900,China
关键词:
分娩方式; 盆底肌力; 生物反馈; 电刺激
Keywords:
Mode of delivery; Pelvic floor muscle strength; Biofeedback; Electrical stimulation
分类号:
R714.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.19.035
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究不同分娩方式患者采用生物反馈电刺激治疗的疗效及对盆底肌力的影响。方法 回顾分析2019年10月-2020年10月我院分娩的102例产妇临床资料，依据分娩方式分为阴道分娩组（60例）和剖宫产分娩组（42例）。两组均给予生物反馈电刺激治疗，比较两组盆底功能指标、治疗有效率、并发症发生率。结果 两组治疗后产妇盆底肌力评分、15 s收缩次数、最大收缩时间、盆底纤维持续收缩力均大于治疗前，且剖宫产分娩组肌力评分高于阴道分娩组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），而两组15 s收缩次数、最大收缩时间、盆底纤维持续收缩力比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；剖宫产分娩组治疗总有效率为95.23%，与阴道分娩组的96.67%比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；随访3个月，剖宫产分娩组并发症发生率为4.76%，低于阴道分娩组11.67%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 通过生物反馈电刺激治疗不同分娩方式患者的治疗疗效基本一致，但与阴道分娩患者比较，剖宫产分娩患者盆底肌力评分较高，远期并发症发生率较低。
Abstract:
Objective To study the effect of biofeedback electrical stimulation on pelvic floor muscle strength in patients with different delivery methods.Methods The clinical data of 102 parturients who delivered in our hospital from October 2019 to October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the mode of delivery, they were divided into two vaginal delivery group(60 cases) and cesarean section delivery group(42 cases), the pelvic floor function, curative rate and complication rate were compared between the two groups.Results After treatment, the scores of pelvic floor muscle strength, 15 s contraction times, maximal contraction time, and the continuous contraction of pelvic floor fiber in the two groups were all higher than those before treatment, and the scores of pelvic floor muscle strength in cesarean delivery group were higher than that in vaginal delivery group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), while there were no significant difference in 15 s contraction times, maximal contraction time and continuous contraction of pelvic floor fibers between the two groups(P>0.05). The total effective rate of cesarean section delivery group was 95.23%, which was compared with that 96.67% of vaginal delivery group, and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Followed up over three months, the complication rate of cesarean section delivery group was 4.76%, which was lower than that 11.67% of vaginal delivery group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Through biofeedback electrical stimulation treatment, the curative effect of different delivery methods is basically the same, but compared with the vaginal delivery, the cesarean delivery have higher pelvic floor muscle strength score and lower long-term complication rate.

参考文献/References:

[1]胡清,张玉,夏志,等.不同分娩方式与产后早期盆底肌电值、肌力变化关系研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2017,33(12):1288-1292.[2]马乐,刘娟,李环,等.产后盆底康复流程第一部分-产后盆底康复意义及基本原则[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2015,4(31):320.[3]王淑静,邓晓岚,菅莹莹,等.不同分娩方式对盆底功能的影响及电刺激治疗的疗效分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2016,8(1):58-64.[4]陈娟,朱兰,庞红霞,等.手法按摩结合生物反馈治疗盆底肌筋膜痛综合征17例疗效分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2018,34(5):547-549.[5]李洁盈,孙文妹,郑秋梅,等.生物反馈电刺激结合盆底肌训练治疗产后盆底功能障碍的作用[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(20):4945-4947.[6]徐建红.产后盆底功能障碍患者早期实施综合康复训练效果分析[J].现代实用医学,2017,29(5):685-686.[7]卢霞,姚立丽,李小文.产后盆底康复锻炼对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的预防作用[J].中国妇幼保健,2018,33(1):38-41.[8]梁彩虹,王献华,沈松艳,等.不同分娩方式对于盆底功能影响及康复治疗[J].中国医药科学,2015,5(20):55-57,67.[9]张艳,易念华,吴兰,等.不同分娩方式对产后早期盆底功能的影响及康复治疗效果评估[J].华中科技大学学报(医学版),2014,43(3):351-355.[10]周雪梅,张昌凤.盆底肌训练和盆底电刺激在产后盆底肌力康复治疗中的应用价值[J].检验医学与临床,2016,13(3):365-367.[12]Morrissey D,Ginzburg N,Whitmore K.Current advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic pelvic pain[J].Curr Opin Urol,2014,24(4):336-344.[13]陈美芳,赵仁峰,林海燕.不同分娩方式对盆底功能的影响及产后盆底康复治疗的效果研究[J].广西医学,2014,36(11):1670-1672.[14]杜玉玲.产后早期盆底肌康复治疗对不同分娩方式产妇盆底康复效果与性功能的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(12):2452-2455.[15]陈翠兰.产后早期盆底肌康复治疗对产妇近期盆底功能的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,7(11):46-49.

相似文献/References:

[1]张秀华,徐 凡,吴 琴,等.川东北地区剖宫产再孕妇女分娩方式的选择对 助产士岗位需求影响的研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(16):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.030]
　ZHANG Xiu-hua,XU Fan,WU Qin,et al.Study on the Influence of the Choice of Delivery Mode on the Demand of Midwives in Re-pregnant Women Underwent Cesarean Section in Northeastern Sichuan[J].Medical Information,2018,31(19):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.030]
[2]吴 琴,祝 艳,徐 凡,等.二胎政策下基于产妇分娩方式的选择对助产士岗位能力需求的研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(07):143.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.043]
　WU Qin,ZHU Yan,XU Fan,et al.Study on the Needs of Midwives' Post Competency Based On The Choice of Maternal Delivery Mode Under the Second Child Policy[J].Medical Information,2019,32(19):143.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.043]
[3]单翠芹,陈书梅.循证护理对妊娠期高血压患者分娩方式及并发症的影响[J].医学信息,2019,32(22):183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.22.065]
　SHAN Cui-qin,CHEN Shu-mei.Effect of Evidence-based Nursing on Delivery Methods and Complications in Patients with Hypertensive Disorder Complicating Pregnancy[J].Medical Information,2019,32(19):183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.22.065]
[4]邓淑珍.低频脉冲电刺激配合雷火灸治疗压力性尿失禁的效果及对盆底肌力和康复效果的影响[J].医学信息,2021,34(22):84.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.22.025]
　DENG Shu-zhen.Effect of Low Frequency Pulse Electric Stimulation Combined with Thunder Fire Moxibustion on Stress Urinary Incontinence and its Effect on Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength and Rehabilitation[J].Medical Information,2021,34(19):84.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.22.025]
[5]尚 禹.初产妇经阴道分娩与剖宫产对产后压力性尿失禁及盆底肌力的影响[J].医学信息,2020,33(18):107.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.18.035]
　SHANG Yu.Influence of Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section of Primipara on Postpartum Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength[J].Medical Information,2020,33(19):107.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.18.035]
[6]陆 娟,卢迎宁.会阴侧切及自然裂伤对初产妇第二产程及产后盆底功能的影响[J].医学信息,2020,33(21):107.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.21.032]
　LU Juan,LU Ying-ning.The Effect of Perineal Lateral Incision and Natural Laceration on Primipara’s Second Stage of Labor and Postpartum Pelvic Floor Function[J].Medical Information,2020,33(19):107.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.21.032]
[7]徐玉婷,缪秀婷,郑 慧.导乐联合自由体位待产对缩短产程及提升顺产的效果[J].医学信息,2023,36(01):161.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.01.035]
　XU Yu-ting,MIAO Xiu-ting,ZHENG Hui.Effect of Doula Combined with Free Position for Labor on Shortening Labor Course and Promoting Spontaneous Delivery[J].Medical Information,2023,36(19):161.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.01.035]
[8]李 琴,曾艳华,刘艳兰.孕期健康教育对社区围产期孕产妇分娩方式和母乳喂养的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(14):163.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.14.035]
　LI Qin,ZENG Yan-hua,LIU Yan-lan.Effect of Health Education During Pregnancy on Delivery Mode and Breast Feeding of Perinatal Pregnant Women in Community[J].Medical Information,2023,36(19):163.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.14.035]
[9]欧阳丽萍,孟召然,李 玲,等.盆底肌力联合盆底超声评估分娩方式对产后早期盆底功能的影响[J].医学信息,2019,32(10):95.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.030]
　OUYANG Li-ping,MENG Zhao-ran,LI Ling,et al.Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength Combined with Pelvic Floor Ultrasound on the Function of Delivery Mode in Early Postpartum Pelvic Floor Function[J].Medical Information,2019,32(19):95.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.030]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01