[1]孙 阳.经腹超声和经阴道超声对剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的诊断价值比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(19):175-177.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.19.048]
　SUN Yang.Comparison of Diagnostic Value of Transabdominal Ultrasound andTransvaginal Ultrasound in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy[J].Medical Information,2021,34(19):175-177.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.19.048]
点击复制

经腹超声和经阴道超声对剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的诊断价值比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年19期
页码:
175-177
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2021-10-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Diagnostic Value of Transabdominal Ultrasound andTransvaginal Ultrasound in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）19-0175-03
作者:
孙 阳
南开大学附属医院/天津市第四医院超声科，天津 300222
Author(s):
SUN Yang
Department of Ultrasound,Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University/Tianjin Fourth Hospital,Tianjin 300222,China
关键词:
经腹超声; 阴道超声; 剖宫产; 瘢痕妊娠
Keywords:
Transabdominal ultrasound; Transvaginal ultrasound; Cesarean section; Cesarean scar pregnancy
分类号:
R714.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.19.048
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究经腹超声和经阴道超声对剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的诊断价值。方法 选取2018年2月-2021年2月在我院就诊的46例剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠患者为研究对象，均采用经腹超声和经阴道超声检查，比较经腹超声和经阴道超声检查诊断准确率、不同分型诊断准确度、灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值。结果 经阴道超声检查诊断准确率为91.30%，高于经腹部超声的78.26%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；经阴道超声检查灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值均高于经腹部超声检查，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 与经腹部超声比较，经阴道超声诊断剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠准确率、灵敏度、特异度高，可为早期剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊断提供可靠的价值。
Abstract:
Objective To study the diagnostic value of transabdominal ultrasound and transvaginal ultrasound in cesarean scar pregnancy.Methods A total of 46 patients with cesarean scar pregnancy in our hospital from February 2018 to February 2018 were selected as research objects, and preformed transabdominal ultrasound and transvaginal ultrasound, the diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography were compared.Results The diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography was 91.30%, which was higher than 78.26% of transabdominal ultrasonography, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05); the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of transvaginal ultrasonography were higher than those of transabdominal ultrasonography, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with transabdominal ultrasound, transvaginal ultrasound has higher accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy, which can provide reliable value for the early diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy.

参考文献/References:

[1]张玉林.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的超声诊断应用价值[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2016,37(3):335-336.[2]Kauffman RP.Treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: another chapter in the fertility preservation saga[J].Fertil Steril,2016,105(4):895-896.[3]范丽琴.彩色多普勒超声在诊断子宫瘢痕妊娠中的应用价值[J].中国民族民间医药杂志,2015,5(10):129-130.[4]王保纪.经阴道彩色多普勒超声检测剖宫产子宫瘢痕妊娠中的临床意义研究[J].中外医疗,2016,36(7):175-177.[5]冯广龙,姜慧杰.ROC曲线分析在医学影像学诊断中的价值[J].中华医学杂志,2015,95(3):231-233.[6]罗艳娣,孙颉.经腹超声和经阴道超声对剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的诊断价值比较[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(8):1788-1790.[7]宋晔,石舟红.经阴道超声与磁共振成像诊断剖宫产术后早期子宫瘢痕妊娠的价值比较[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(24):6333-6335.[8]范志华.经阴道彩色多普勒超声对剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的诊断价值(附50例分析)[J].福建医药杂志,2016,38(6):140-142.[9]Peng P,Gui T,Liu XY,et al.Comparative efficacy and safety of local and systemic methotrexate injection in cesarean scar pregnancy[J].Ther Clin Risk Manag,2015(11):137-142.[10]张燕辉,米骏麟,涂伟娴,等.经腹和经阴道超声对剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的诊断价值比较[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2018,43(2):1182-1183.[11]杨仁东,袁秀英,古雯洁,等.经阴道彩色多普勒超声在剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治中的价值[J].中国医药导报,2015,12(12):167-169.[12]曹燕,耿秀艳,赵长燕.经阴道彩色多普勒超声诊断剖宫产切口瘢痕妊娠的临床价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(5):1067-1069.[13]Kong D,Dong X,Qi Y.Ultrasonography-guided multidrug stratification interventional therapy for cesarean scar pregnancy[J].Archives Gynecol Obstet,2015,292(1):143-148.[14]王珉鑫,孙咏梅.经阴道彩色多普勒超声在剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠中的诊断价值[J].中国现代医生,2016,54(31):97-98.[15]魏晓敏.经阴道彩色多普勒超声诊断子宫切口妊娠的临床应用[J].医学研究杂志,2017,46(2):152-154.

相似文献/References:

[1]苗 琦,肖晓芳.阴道超声联合血清β-HCG检测对稽留流产患者子宫动脉血流动力学变化及预后的预测分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(22):151.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.22.037]
　MIAO Qi,XIAO Xiao-fang.Prediction of Uterine Artery Hemodynamic Changes and Prognosis in Patients with Missed Abortion by Transvaginal Ultrasound Combined with Serum β-HCG[J].Medical Information,2022,35(19):151.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.22.037]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01