[1]刘传志.手法复位小夹板固定对骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折患者临床症状及腕关节功能的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(16):118-120124.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.029]
　LIU Chuan-zhi.Effect of Manual Reduction and Splint Fixation on Clinical Symptoms and Wrist Function in Patients with Radius Distal Osteoporosis Fracture[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(16):118-120124.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.029]
点击复制

手法复位小夹板固定对骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折患者临床症状及腕关节功能的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年16期
页码:
118-120124
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-08-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Manual Reduction and Splint Fixation on Clinical Symptoms and Wrist Function in Patients with Radius Distal Osteoporosis Fracture
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）16-0118-04
作者:
刘传志
（赣州市蓉江新区红十字会医院外科，江西 赣州 341400）
Author(s):
LIU Chuan-zhi
(Department of Surgery,Red Cross Hospital of Rongjiang New District,Ganzhou 341400,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折; 手法复位小夹板固定; 腕关节功能; 掌倾角; 尺偏角
Keywords:
Radius distal osteoporosis fracture; Manual reduction and splint fixation; Wrist joint function;  palm inclination; Ulnar deviation
分类号:
R687.3；R58
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.029
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究手法复位小夹板固定对骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折（RDOF）患者临床症状及腕关节功能的影响。方法 选取2018年9月-2020年9月我院收治的60例RDOF患者，按照随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组，各30例。对照组应用切开复位钢板内固定治疗，观察组应用手法复位小夹板固定治疗，比较两组掌倾角、尺偏角、桡骨茎突高度、Mayo腕关节功能评分、骨折愈合时间、疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）、不良反应。结果 治疗后3个月，对照组掌倾角、尺偏角、桡骨茎突高度、Mayo腕关节功能评分均大于观察组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），治疗后6个月，两组掌倾角、尺偏角、桡骨茎突高度、Mayo腕关节功能评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；观察组骨折愈合时间短于对照组，且VAS评分小于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组不良反应发生率低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 手法复位小夹板固定方案可促进RDOF患者桡骨远端骨骼形态的恢复，改善其腕关节功能，缩短骨折愈合时间，减少患者疼痛，且不良反应少。
Abstract:
Objective To study the effect of manual reduction and splint fixation on clinical symptoms and wrist function in patients with radius distal osteoporosis fracture (RDOF).Methods Sixty patients with RDOF admitted to our hospital from September 2018 to September 2020 were selected and randomly divided into the control group and the observation group, with 30 cases in each group. The control group was treated with open reduction and plate internal fixation, and the observation group was treated with manual reduction and small splint fixation. The palmar inclination, ulnar deviation, radial styloid height, Mayo wrist function score, fracture healing time, pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results After 3 months of treatment, the palmar tilt angle, ulnar deviation angle, radial styloid height and Mayo wrist function score in the control group were higher than those in the observation group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). At 6 months after treatment, there was no significant difference in palmar inclination, ulnar deviation, radial styloid height and Mayo wrist function score between the two groups (P>0.05). The fracture healing time of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group, and the VAS score was lower than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Manual reduction and small splint fixation can promote the recovery of bone morphology of distal radius in patients with RDOF, improve wrist function, shorten fracture healing time, reduce pain, and have less adverse reactions.

参考文献/References:

[1]Chambers LR,Juels P,Mauffrey C,et al.Initial management of humeral shaft fractures with functional splints versus coaptation splints[J].European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology,2021,31(2):1129-1134.[2]孙强,李峰,伍亮,等.正骨夹板外固定和手术内固定治疗高龄骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的效果比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(10):128-130.[3]潘廷明.手法复位石膏外固定联合中药熏洗和切开复位钢板内固定治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折临床观察[J].光明中医,2020,35(19):3059-3060.[4]李卫国.手法复位小夹板外固定与切开复位钢板内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的疗效对比[J].实用中西医结合临床,2020,20(6):121-122.[5]吴晓林,钟伟,梁答,等.两种固定方式治疗老年骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2020,28(6):512-516.[6]Thelen S,Grassmann JP,Jungbluth P,et al.Distal radius fractures:current treatment concepts and controversies[J].Chirurg,2018,89:798-812.[7]王达源,李仕斌,蔡志伟.手法复位小夹板固定治疗骨质疏松型桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效分析[J].现代诊断与治疗,2019,30(16):2859-2861.[8]邓建海,宋晓玺,张莉,等.手法复位石膏外固定与切开复位钢板内固定治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(11):1218-1219.[9]杨振勋,李刚.手法复位夹板外固定联合中药熏洗和切开复位钢板内固定治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折疗效对比[J].中医临床研究,2021,13(17):76-79.[10]王鸿洲,纪木强,王宇胜,等.手法复位小夹板固定治疗骨质疏松型桡骨远端骨折效果观察[J].海南医学,2017,28(7):1076-1078.[11]杨松,高峻青,付记乐,等.手法复位石膏外固定与切开复位钢板内固定对骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折患者腕关节功能和生活质量的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2018,18(16):3143-3147.[12]潘廷明,董忠,杨连梓,等.手法复位石膏外固定联合中药熏洗治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的临床研究[J].白求恩医学杂志,2018,16(3):235-237.[13]徐响林.手法复位石膏外固定和切开复位钢板内固定治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的对比分析[J].沈阳医学院学报,2018,20(3):201-203.[14]蔡国雄,肖智青,谢延华,等.手法复位小夹板固定治疗骨质疏松型桡骨远端骨折的疗效分析[J].中医临床研究,2018,10(6):130-131.[15]曹少芬,黄鑫,张龙,等.手法复位小夹板外固定配合四子散热熨治疗老年骨质疏松性桡骨远端B型骨折临床观察[J].实用中医药杂志,2018,34(3):289-290.[16]Cui X,Liang L,Zhang H,et al.The effectiveness and safety of plaster splint and splints for distal radius fractures:A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Medicine,2020,99(9):e19211.[17]金平平.手法复位石膏外固定和切开复位钢板内固定治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的疗效分析[J].中国疗养医学,2017,26(11):1178-1179.[18]王鸿洲,纪木强,王宇胜,等.手法复位小夹板固定治疗骨质疏松型桡骨远端骨折效果观察[J].海南医学,2017,28(7):1076-1078.[19]刘志昂,张陆,刘军,等.手法复位小夹板固定和切开复位内固定治疗骨质疏松型桡骨远端骨折的优劣差异[J].实用中西医结合临床,2018,18(10):131-132.[20]沈军,刘爱波,王忠岳,等.小夹板和石膏固定治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的疗效比较[J].浙江中医杂志,2016,51(6):439.[21]郭世明,石玲玲,郭志民,等.手法复位石膏外固定和切开复位钢板内固定治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的比较研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(4):15-20.[22]陈乃庆.手法复位小夹板固定对骨质疏松型桡骨远端骨折患者疼痛程度及功能恢复的影响[J].基层医学论坛,2020,24(2):191-192.[23]张海英.手法复位石膏外固定法与切开复位钢板内固定法在骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折治疗中的效果对比观察[J].四川中医,2016,34(11):166-169.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01