[1]李 美,戎 荣,陈正徐.育龄期女性孕前TORCH检测感染现状及其影响因素分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(17):91-94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.17.024]
　LI Mei,RONG Rong,CHEN Zheng-xu.Analysis of Infection Status and Influencing Factors of Pre-Pregnancy TORCH Detection in Women of Childbearing Age[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(17):91-94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.17.024]
点击复制

育龄期女性孕前TORCH检测感染现状及其影响因素分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年17期
页码:
91-94
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2022-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of Infection Status and Influencing Factors of Pre-Pregnancy TORCH Detection in Women of Childbearing Age
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）17-0091-04
作者:
李 美; 戎 荣; 陈正徐
（合肥市第二人民医院/安徽医科大学附属合肥医院检验科，安徽 合肥 230011）
Author(s):
LI Mei; RONG Rong; CHEN Zheng-xu
(Department of Clinical Laboratory,the Second People’s Hospital of Hefei/Hefei Hospital Affiliated toAnhui Medical University,Hefei 230011,Anhui,China)
关键词:
育龄期女性; TORCH检测; 感染现状
Keywords:
Women of childbearing age; TORCH detection; Infection status
分类号:
R446.6；R169.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.17.024
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究女性孕前TORCH检测感染现状，并对其影响因素进行分析研究，为预防TORCH感染和提高优生优育提供参考依据。方法 收集2019年1月-2020年12月于我院进行孕前TORCH检测的孕龄期妇女500例作为研究对象，检测血清中的TORCH抗体浓度，分析TORCH感染现状及其危险因素。结果 RV-IgG和CMV-IgG指标的阳性人数最多，其感染率分别为84.20%、77.40%；CMV-IgM和TOX-IgM指标的阳性人数最少，其感染率分别为2.40%、3.20%。不同年龄段人群中RV-IgG、CMV-IgG和TOX-IgG三项指标的阳性率比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），CMV-IgM及TOX-IgM阳性率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；不同学历、宠物饲养状态、居住地的人群，TORCH检测指标阳性率比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；不同年龄、妊娠史、经济状况TORCH检测阳性率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；年龄、学历、是否饲养宠物及研究对象的居住地是造成研究对象是发生TORCH相关病原体感染的危险因素（P＜0.05）。结论 育龄期女性孕前TORCH检测感染现状主要为RV和CMV提示阳性感染，其他病原体阳性者较少，且年龄、学历、是否饲养宠物及研究对象的居住地是造成育龄期女性感染的危险因素。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the infection status of TORCH detection in women before pregnancy and analyze its influencing factors, so as to provide reference for preventing TORCH infection and improving eugenics.Methods A total of 500 pregnant women who underwent pre-pregnancy TORCH testing in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were collected as subjects. The concentration of TORCH antibodies in serum was detected, and the status of TORCH infection and its risk factors were analyzed.Results The positive numbers of RV-IgG and CMV-IgG were the highest, and the infection rates were 84.20% and 77.40%, respectively; the positive number of CMV-IgM and TOX-IgM was the least, and the infection rates were 2.40% and 3.20%, respectively. There were significant differences in the positive rates of RV-IgG, CMV-IgG and TOX-IgG among different age groups (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences in the positive rates of CMV-IgM and TOX-IgM (P＞0.05).There were statistically significant differences in the positive rate of TORCH detection index among people with different educational background, pet feeding status and residence (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the positive rate of TORCH detection among different ages, pregnancy history and economic status (P＞0.05). Age, education, whether to keep pets and the residence of the subjects were the risk factors for TORCH-related pathogen infection (P<0.05).Conclusion The infection status of TORCH detection in women of childbearing age before pregnancy is mainly RV and CMV positive infection, and other pathogens are less positive. Age, education, pet ownership and residence of the subjects are risk factors for infection in women of childbearing age.

参考文献/References:

[1]孙霞,董春忠,陈玉香,等.妊娠中晚期TORCH感染与出生缺陷发生关系分析[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2021,29(1):149-151,155.[2]张兰,曾利,陶新梅.育龄妇女TORCH-IgM检测及不良妊娠与TORCH感染关系[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2021,29(2):355-357.[3]刘艾朋,郭锐,范忠媛,等.TORCH、G6PD水平与新生儿高胆红素血症的关系研究[J].中国实验诊断学,2021,25(7):1003-1006.[4]张倩,陈少华,孙永梅,等.某肿瘤医院儿童血液病患者TORCH感染状况研究[J].热带病与寄生虫学,2021,19(2):70-73.[5]姜晔.酶联免疫吸附试验与化学发光法检测TORCH抗体的方法学对比研究[J].检验医学与临床,2021,18(1):70-72.[6]郑维玲,朱耿超,石燕,等.国产化学发光法评估围孕期妇女TORCH感染情况及其IgM假阳性结果的分析[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2021,28(7):1135-1140.[7]胡丽庆,褚金国,董晓燕,等.21445例就诊者血清TORCH筛查结果分析[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2021,31(7):862-865.[8]刘丽琴,黄必堂,钟琼.2012至2018年育龄妇女及新生儿TORCH筛查结果分析[J].中国实验诊断学,2020,24(5):793-796.[9]马建萍,李晓菲,郭争艳,等.济南地区2015-2019年育龄女性TORCH感染状况分析[J].临床检验杂志,2020,38(11):878-880.[10]刘杰,王利娟,邵青春,等.2015~2019年孕妇TORCH血清学分析[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2020,27(5):782-785.[11]朱宏蛟,糜兰馨,向春梅.2015-2018年达州市中心医院孕妇产前TORCH检查结果分析[J].预防医学情报杂志,2020,36(6):756-759.[12]张建明,顾纯吉,宋雅雅,等.苏州地区育龄妇女TORCH感染流行病学调查分析[J].中国血液流变学杂志,2020,30(4):526-528.[13]薄晋魏,张智燕,戈娜.包头地区6000例新生儿TORCH检测结果分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(9):1660-1662.[14]马娟,宋艳杰,樊友莉,等.妊娠期妇女TORCH感染患者IgM和IgG的表达水平及妊娠结局[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2020,30(20):3146-3150.[15]武荣荣,李永祥,周贞,等.嘉兴地区2015年-2017年育龄期妇女TORCH感染情况分析[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2020,30(2):161-163.[16]龙诗芬,夏伟兰,季新梅,等.5160例育龄女性孕前优生TORCH感染现状及其相关影响因素分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2020,28(12):1470-1472,1554.[17]张林莎,叶明刚,辛增莲,等.乌鲁木齐地区6967例育龄妇女TORCH感染调查分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2020,28(4):459-460,472.[18]梁红峰,姚锦绣,何栋,等.某城镇地区孕妇TORCH感染血清抗体筛查结果分析[J].热带医学杂志,2020,20(5):642-644,670.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈玉凤,刘 晨,楚光华,等.子宫内膜异位症的西药治疗[J].医学信息,2022,35(06):60.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.06.015]
　CHEN Yu-feng,LIU Chen,CHU Guang-hua,et al.Study on Western Medicine Treatment of Endometriosis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(17):60.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.06.015]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01