[1]刘守亮,蒋 青.微通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗上路尿结石患者碎石效果研究[J].医学信息,2022,35(21):113-115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.21.028]
　LIU Shou-liang,JIANG Qing.Study on the Effect of Microchannel Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Patients with Upper Urinary Calculi[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(21):113-115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.21.028]
点击复制

微通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗上路尿结石患者碎石效果研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年21期
页码:
113-115
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-11-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Effect of Microchannel Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Patients with Upper Urinary Calculi
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）21-0113-03
作者:
刘守亮; 蒋 青
（1.上犹县人民医院泌尿外科，江西 上犹 341200；2.德安县人民医院泌尿外科，江西 德安 330400）
Author(s):
LIU Shou-liang; JIANG Qing
(1.Department of Urology,Shangyou County People’s Hospital,Shangyou 341200,Jiangxi,China;2.Department of Urology,De’an County People’s Hospital,De’an 330400,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
微通道经皮肾镜碎石术; 上路尿结石; 结石清除率
Keywords:
Microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Urinary stones on the road; Stone clearance rate
分类号:
R691.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.21.028
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究微通道经皮肾镜碎石术对上路尿结石患者碎石效果及并发症的影响。方法 选取2018年12月-2021年6月在我院诊治的42例上路尿结石患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各21例。对照组采用标准通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗，观察组采用微通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗，比较两组手术指标、结石清除率、结石清理时间、术后疼痛度及并发症发生率。结果 观察组术中出血量、住院时间均小于对照组，手术时间、结石直径均长于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组结石清除率为95.24%，高于对照组的80.95%（P＜0.05）；观察组结石清理时间长于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组0级、Ⅰ级疼痛发生率高于对照组，Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级疼痛发生率低于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组并发症发生率为4.76%，低于对照组的19.05%（P＜0.05）。结论 微通道经皮肾镜碎石术对上路尿结石患者碎石效果确切，可提高结石清除率，减轻术后疼痛度，降低并发症发生率，是一种安全性高的治疗方法，但其手术和结石清理时间较长，临床应合理选择手术方案。
Abstract:
Objective To study the effect of microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy on lithotripsy and complications in patients with upper urinary calculi.Methods A total of 42 patients with upper urinary calculi diagnosed and treated in our hospital from December 2018 to June 2021 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 21 cases in each group. The control group was treated with standard channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and the observation group was treated with microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The surgical indexes, stone clearance rate, stone clearance time, postoperative pain and complication rate were compared between the two groups.Results The intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization time of the observation group were less than those of the control group, and the operation time and stone diameter were longer than those of the control group (P<0.05). The stone clearance rate of the observation group was 95.24%, which was higher than 80.95% of the control group (P<0.05). The stone clearance time in the observation group was longer than that in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of grade 0 and grade Ⅰ pain in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the incidence of grade Ⅱ and grade Ⅲ pain was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 4.76%, which was lower than 19.05% in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy is effective in the treatment of patients with upper urinary calculi, which can improve the stone clearance rate, reduce postoperative pain, reduce the incidence of complications, and is a safe treatment method. However, the operation and stone clearance time is long, and the clinical operation scheme should be reasonably selected.

参考文献/References:

[1]疏翀,项平,朱劲松.微通道和标准通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石的疗效及对机体应激状态的影响[J].广西医科大学学报,2017,34(11):1614-1617.[2]李建,陈爽,王强,等.经皮肾镜碎石取石术中放置肾盂造瘘管对肾结石患者围术期指标、炎症因子及术后并发症的影响[J].实用医院临床杂志,2020,17(2):164-167.[3]Pappas P,Leonardou P,Papadoukakis S,et al.Urgent superselec tive segmental renal artery embolization in the treatment of life threatening renal hemorrhage[J].Urol Int,2016,77(1):34-41. [4]张家瑞,刘金山,张廷涛,等.微通道经皮肾镜碎石术对上尿路结石患者炎性因子、氧化应激及并发症的影响[J].实用医院临床杂志,2021,18(4):36-39.[5]杨文增,崔振宇,安丰,等．输尿管软镜与微通道经皮肾镜在输尿管上段结石治疗中的对比研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2016,22(11):11-14．[6]高江涛.微通道经皮肾镜碎石术对上路尿结石患者碎石效果及并发症分析[J].罕少疾病杂志,2017,24(3):59-60,63．[7]赵蓉,沈昊,周家杰,等.肾盂尿及结石细菌培养与经皮肾镜取石术后尿脓毒症的相关性研究[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2019,34(7):557-561.[8]李刚,马江,马文军,等.体外冲击波碎石治疗下尿路结石的临床疗效及并发症的影响因素研究[J].贵州医药,2020,44(9):1393-1394.[9]Gupta R,Gupta A,Singh G,et al.PCNL -A comparative study in nonoperated and in previously operated (open nephrolithotomy/pyelolithotomy) patients-a single-surgeon experience[J].Int Braz J Urol,2016,37(6):739-744[10]赵岩,候本国,马伟明,等.微通道经皮肾镜取石术与标准通道经皮肾镜取石术对比研究[J].泌尿外科杂志,2016(2):43-46.[11]李高飞,张慕淳,张刚,等.“无管化”微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石68例临床观察[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2017,37(1):47-50.[12]邱庆宇.不同手术方式治疗尿结石的临床疗效分析[J].中国卫生标准管理,2018,9(12):69-71.[13]王维国,夏菲,蒋欣杰,等.无管化微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石的疗效及安全性[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2020,40(6):1020-1023.[14]江斌,卓栋,张振兴,等.部分无管化经皮肾镜取石术的安全性及优势探讨[J].皖南医学院学报,2019,38(1):66-68. [15]伍信阳,张巧珍,李艳芳,等.无管化微创经皮肾镜取石术后留置输尿管外支架对术后疼痛和感染的预防效果[J].广东医学,2019,40(1):101-104.[16]孔德志,朱永士,李虎.无管化经皮肾镜取石术治疗对上尿路结石患者结石清除率、肾功能指标及血流动力学的影响[J].实用医院临床杂志,2018,15(4):118-120.[17]翟玉章,孙峰,孙新成,等.完全无管化与部分无管化经皮肾镜取石术适应证的探讨[J].安徽医药,2018,22(5):900-903.[18]石国忠,李风,夏宗禹,等.微通道和标准通道经皮肾镜碎石术对上尿路结石患者血流动力学和血气分析的影响[J].中国全科医学,2016,18(2):215-218．[19]谌磊,龙永其,韩志军,等.无管化经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗2cm以下肾下盏结石的疗效对比[J].中国医学工程,2018,26(2):82-84.[20]郝志轩,郭强,王振兴,等.完全无管化经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石安全性和疗效的荟萃分析[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2019,34(10):770-774.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01