[1]晏祥任,洪卓酌,霍小玲.拔除下颌智齿手术时不同牙冠切割方式对手术时间及术后创伤的影响分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(22):115-117.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.22.025]
　YAN Xiang-ren,HONG Zhuo-zhuo,HUO Xiao-ling.Effect of Different Crown Cutting Methods on Operation Time and Postoperative Trauma in Extraction of Mandibular Wisdom Teeth[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(22):115-117.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.22.025]
点击复制

拔除下颌智齿手术时不同牙冠切割方式对手术时间及术后创伤的影响分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年22期
页码:
115-117
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Different Crown Cutting Methods on Operation Time and Postoperative Trauma in Extraction of Mandibular Wisdom Teeth
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）22-0115-03
作者:
晏祥任; 洪卓酌; 霍小玲
（暨南大学附属顺德医院口腔科，广东 顺德 528305）
Author(s):
YAN Xiang-ren; HONG Zhuo-zhuo; HUO Xiao-ling
(Department of Stomatology,the Affiliated Shunde Hospital of Jinan University,Shunde 528305,Guangdong,China)
关键词:
下颌智齿; 牙冠切割方式; 劈冠法; 高速涡轮牙钻磨裂沟法
Keywords:
Mandibular wisdom teeth; Crown cutting method; Crown splitting method; High speed turbine tooth drill grinding crack method
分类号:
R782.11
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.22.025
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察拔除下颌智齿手术时不同的牙冠切割方式对手术时间及术后创伤的影响。方法 选取2020年5月-2021年5月在我院诊治的54例下颌智齿患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各27例。对照组采用常规劈冠法，观察组采用高速涡轮牙钻磨裂沟法，比较两组手术指标、术后并发症发生率、拔除效果、患者治疗满意度及疼痛和肿胀评分。结果 观察组手术时间、术中出血量、张口受限程度均小于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组术后并发症发生率为7.41%，低于对照组的18.52%（P＜0.05）；观察组拔除智齿优良率为96.30%，高于对照组的81.48%（P＜0.05）；观察组治疗满意度为100.00%，高于对照组的88.89%（P＜0.05）；观察组疼痛评分、肿胀评分均低于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 拔除下颌智齿手术时选择不同的牙冠切割方式会对手术指标造成影响，相对而言采用高速涡轮牙钻磨裂沟法手术时间短，可提高拔除优良率，降低术后疼痛、肿胀以及并发症发生率，患者满意度高，有效性和安全性良好。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the effect of different crown cutting methods on the operation time and postoperative trauma during mandibular wisdom tooth extraction.Methods A total of 54 patients with mandibular wisdom teeth diagnosed and treated in our hospital from May 2020 to May 2021 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 27 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional crown splitting method, and the observation group was treated with high-speed turbine drill grinding fissure method. The surgical indicators, postoperative complication rate, removal effect, patient satisfaction and pain and swelling scores were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time, blood loss and limitation of mouth opening in the observation group were less than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 7.41%, which was lower than 18.52% in the control group (P<0.05). The excellent and good rate of wisdom tooth extraction in the observation group was 96.30%, which was higher than 81.48% in the control group (P<0.05). The treatment satisfaction of the observation group was 100.00%, which was higher than 88.89% of the control group (P<0.05). The pain score and swelling score of the observation group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion The selection of different crown cutting methods during the extraction of mandibular wisdom teeth will affect the surgical indicators. Relatively speaking, the use of high-speed turbine tooth drill grinding ditch method has a short operation time, which can improve the excellent and good rate of extraction, reduce the incidence of postoperative pain, swelling and complications. Patient satisfaction ishigh, effectiveness and safety are good.

参考文献/References:

[1]金琳韵,应婷婷.涡轮机法与锤凿劈冠法拔除下颌阻生智齿的疗效对比分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2018,23(5):926-927.[2]张舒,李丽丽.下颌智齿拔除对第二磨牙牙周恢复情况的影响[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报,2021,55(4):435-438.[3]雷飞,倪菁,王丹杨.微创拔牙技术在下颌埋伏阻生智齿拔除过程中的应用研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2020,36(6):338-341.[4]郭雪生,王建国.关于微创拔牙术在下颌阻生智齿拔除中的应用效果分析[C]//2017国际数字医学会数字中医药分会论文集.2017.[5]陈宇,闫妍,刘长亮.高频电刀联合高速涡轮牙钻治疗下颌低位埋伏阻生智齿疗效观察[J].中国美容医学,2021,30(3):124-127.[6]李军红,才裕涛.微创拔牙术在下颌阻生智齿拔除中的应用[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2016,26(17):95-97.[7]慕红文.下颌阻生智齿拔除术中根折危险因素分析[J].医学理论与实践,2016,29(10):1341-1343.[8]李越,武海春.不同牙冠切割方案在拔除下颌智齿时的效果对比[J].检验医学与临床,2016,12(1245):1679-1681.[9]单杰波,茅天赋,陆英.比较不同手术拔除下颌低位阻生智齿的疗效[J].浙江创伤外科,2021,26(2):275-276.[10]孙巍.拔除下颌智齿手术时不同的牙冠切割方式对手术时间及术后创伤的影响分析[J].全科口腔医学杂志,2018,12(5):46-48.[11]甄栋,付美清.不同方法拔除下颌阻生智齿的效果对比评定[J].泰山医学院学报,2016,12(1237):1427-1428.[12]平宇炳.微创拔牙技术与传统凿骨劈冠法拔除下颌低位埋伏阻生智齿的临床效果对比[J].山西医药杂志,2015,(9):1067-1068.[13]齐伟,李健男,赵静仁,等.角形切口设计和愈合方式与下颌阻生智齿拔除术后并发症[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2019,15(5):949-450.[14]刘治强.微创拔牙用于下颌智齿拔除中的临床效果[J].中国继续医学教育,2018,15(10):91-93.[15]吴泽键,陈伟生,黄志权.超声骨刀在下颌近中低位阻生智齿拔除中的应用[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2017,27(4):263-266.[16]张福.锤凿劈冠法、高速涡轮钻微创法在下颌低位阻生智齿治疗中的效果对比[J].中外医学研究,2020,18(7):28-30.[17]邹立东,王智,于森,等.牙椅慢速直机辅助拔除下颌复杂阻生智齿临床研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2017,15(7):42-44.[18]韩新生,明华伟,李龙江,等.高速涡轮机法与增隙经舌侧法在下颌阻生齿拔除术中的效果对比[J].西部医学,2016,20(11):74-76.[19]韩华伟.超声骨刀微创拔牙术拔除下颌低位阻生智齿的疗效观察[J].实用中西医结合临床,2020,20(8):62-64.[20]姚友根,聂香梅.超声骨刀微创拔牙法与传统凿骨劈冠法拔除阻生智齿的效果比较[J].宜春学院学报,2021,43(12):70-72.[21]苏伟喆.超声骨刀联合高速涡轮钻拔除下颌复杂阻生第三磨牙的临床效果评价[D].太原:山西医科大学,2020.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01