[1]顾振华,陈志毅,张 旺,等.多根克氏针撬拔复位联合肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的临床疗效及对肩关节功能的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(08):94-97.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.08.019]
 GU Zhen-hua,CHEN Zhi-yi,ZHANG Wang,et al.Clinical Efficacy of Multiple Kirschner Wire Prying Reduction Combined with Proximal Humeral Locking Plate in the Treatment of Fracture of Surgical Neck of Humerus and its Effect on Shoulder Joint Function[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(08):94-97.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.08.019]
点击复制

多根克氏针撬拔复位联合肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的临床疗效及对肩关节功能的影响()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年08期
页码:
94-97
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-04-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Efficacy of Multiple Kirschner Wire Prying Reduction Combined with Proximal Humeral Locking Plate in the Treatment of Fracture of Surgical Neck of Humerus and its Effect on Shoulder Joint Function
文章编号:
1006-1959(2023)08-0094-04
作者:
顾振华陈志毅张 旺
(莲花县人民医院骨科,江西 莲花 337100)
Author(s):
GU Zhen-huaCHEN Zhi-yiZHANG Wanget al.
(Department of Orthopaedics,Lianhua People’s Hospital,Lianhua 337100,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
克氏针撬拔复位肱骨近端锁定钢板肱骨外科颈骨折肩关节功能
Keywords:
Kirschner wire prying reductionLocking proximal humerus plateFracture of surgical neck of humerusShoulder function
分类号:
R683.41
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.08.019
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究多根克氏针撬拔复位联合肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的临床疗效及对肩关节功能的影响。方法 选取2017年3月-2021年6月我院治疗的80例肱骨外科颈骨折患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组(40例)和观察组(40例),对照组采用直视复位联合肱骨近端锁定钢板固定治疗,观察组采用多根克氏针撬拔复位联合肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗,比较两组临床手术指标、Constant-Murley评分、肩关节活动度及并发症发生率。结果 观察组手术时间长于对照组、骨折愈合时间及住院时间短于对照组、切口长度长于对照组、术中出血量少于对照组(P<0.05);两组术后6个月Constant-Murley各维度评分均高于术前,且观察高于对照组(P<0.05);两组术后6个月肩关节外旋、前屈上举及外展活动度大于术前,且观察组大于对照组(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 多根克氏针撬拔复位联合肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗肱骨外科颈骨折效果确切,可改善临床手术指标,减少手术创伤,提高肩关节功能和活动度,且手术安全性较高,值得临床应用。
Abstract:
Objective To study the clinical efficacy of multiple Kirschner wire prying reduction combined with proximal humerus locking plate in the treatment of fracture of surgical neck of humerus and its effect on shoulder joint function.Methods A total of 80 patients with fracture of surgical neck of humerus treated in our hospital from March 2017 to June 2021 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group (40 cases) and observation group (40 cases) by random number table method. The control group was treated with direct reduction combined with proximal humeral locking plate fixation. The observation group was treated with multiple Kirschner wire prying reduction combined with proximal humeral locking plate. The clinical operation indexes, Constant-Murley score, shoulder joint mobility and complication rate were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group, the fracture healing time and hospitalization time were shorter than those of the control group, the incision length was longer than that of the control group, and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group (P<0.05). The Constant-Murley scores of the two groups at 6 months after operation were higher than those before operation, and the observation was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The external rotation, flexion and abduction of shoulder joint in the two groups at 6 months after operation were greater than those before operation, and those in the observation group were greater than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the observation group and the control group (P>0.05).Conclusion Multiple Kirschner wire prying reduction combined with proximal humeral locking plate is effective in the treatment of fracture of surgical neck of humerus, which can improve clinical surgical indicators, reduce surgical trauma, improve shoulder joint function and activity, and has high surgical safety. It is worthy of clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1]叶鹏胜,陈述祥,索鹏,等.切开复位锁定钢板与闭合复位交锁髓内钉内固定治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2021,23(8):723-726.[2]崔化天,崔玉莹.交锁髓内钉内固定术对肱骨外科颈骨折患者骨折愈合及肩关节功能的影响[J].实用医技杂志,2021,28(12):1475-1477.[3]Song H,Wang M,Du H,et al.Comparison of locking plates and intramedullary nails in treatment of three-part or four-part proximal humeral neck fractures in elderly population:A randomized trial protocol[J].Medicine,2020,99(46):e22914.[4]张晓峰,毛汉兴,陈伟兵,等.解剖锁定钢板联合肱骨距螺钉治疗Neer四部分肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2021,36(5):516-517.[5]刘中砥,许庭珉,付中国,等.有限切开复位髓内外联合固定技术治疗股骨转子下骨折的临床随访[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2020,52(6):118-122.[6]梁震,郭永明.交锁髓内钉结合重建钢板治疗胫腓骨多段骨折[J].中国临床研究,2019,32(3):385-388.[7]Zhao L,Zhang X,Guo Z,et al.Use of modified 3D digital surgical guides in the treatment of complex mandibular fractures[J].J Craniomaxillofac Surg,2021,49(4):282-291.[8]王旭东,邵菲,范小波,等.经皮微创锁定钢板内固定对老年肱骨近端骨折患者的临床疗效[J].创伤外科杂志,2020,22(5):371-375.[9]印杰,曹涤平,李超,等.MIPO技术结合锁定加压钢板,顺行交锁髓内钉及锁定加压钢板治疗肱骨干中段骨折疗效的对比研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2021,21(12):2253-2257,2279.[10]刘永,孙军,阚利胜,等.肘内侧小切口联合操纵杆技术治疗肱骨内上髁骨折的疗效分析[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2022,43(5):449-452.[11]张涵,何斌,王云华,等.手法复位结合微创T型小切口锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨外科颈骨折的临床观察[J].实用老年医学,2020,34(7):712-714.[12]Deng XY,Fan ZY,Yu BF,et al.Use of a locking intramedullary nail for the treatment of initial varus proximal humeral fracture: a prospective pilot study[J].J Int Med Res,2020,48(6):300-309.[13]李昱川,贾杉,周文,等.肱骨近端多维带锁髓内钉治疗老年不稳定性肱骨外科颈骨折的临床研究[J].广西医科大学学报,2022,39(6):948-952.[14]Dang KH,Jensen K,Dutta AK.Early outcomes of magnetic intramedullary compression nailing for humeral fractures[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2021,31(1):23-31.[15]贾进,陆晓涛,蒙顺,等.双钢板与锁定钢板在复杂肱骨近端骨折治疗中的疗效比较[J].昆明医科大学学报,2022,43(2):82-88.[16]邱文奎,苏振炎,张益宏,等.经皮微创钢板内固定术和传统切开复位内固定术治疗肱骨外科颈骨折对比研究[J].创伤外科杂志,2019,21(3):197-200.[17]陈有昌,饶海军,邓志荣.微创经皮钢板内固定治疗肱骨外科颈骨折疗效观察[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2018,26(6):8-10.[18]彭方亮,尤伟艳,李晶,等.髓内钉和微创接骨板技术结合锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨外科颈(NeerⅡ型)骨折的疗效比较[J].中国老年学杂志,2020,40(9):1871-1874.[19]庄家林,蒲超,唐付林,等.微创手术MIPO和开放手术ORIF治疗肱骨干中段骨折的机体应激程度及骨代谢活性评估[J].海南医学院学报,2017,23(11):1520-1522,1526.[20]张勇,郭维忠,张媛,等.经皮微创接骨板内固定治疗对肱骨下段骨折患者血清骨钙素、碱性磷酸酶及关节功能评分的影响[J].解放军医药杂志,2021,33(7):50-53.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01