[1]刘芷含.霍乱监测中4号琼脂、TCBS琼脂及庆大霉素琼脂优劣势对比[J].医学信息,2023,36(22):148-151.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.22.034]
　LIU Zhi-han.Comparison of Advantages and Disadvantages of No.4 Agar,TCBS Agar and Gentamicin Agar in Cholera Surveillance[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(22):148-151.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.22.034]
点击复制

霍乱监测中4号琼脂、TCBS琼脂及庆大霉素琼脂优劣势对比()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年22期
页码:
148-151
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2023-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Advantages and Disadvantages of No.4 Agar,TCBS Agar and Gentamicin Agar in Cholera Surveillance
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）22-0148-04
作者:
刘芷含
（浮梁县疾病预防控制中心检验科，江西 浮梁 333400）
Author(s):
LIU Zhi-han
(Laboratory Department of Fuliang County Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Fuliang 333400,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
霍乱弧菌; 4号琼脂; TCBS琼脂; 庆大霉素琼脂; 培养基成分; 病菌检出率
Keywords:
Vibrio cholerae; No. 4 agar; TCBS agar; Gentamicin agar; Composition of culture medium; Bacterial detection rate
分类号:
R378.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.22.034
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对比4号琼脂、TCBS琼脂及庆大霉素琼脂在霍乱监测中的优劣势。方法 选取2022年1月-2023年3月浮梁县疾病预防控制中心检验科分离保存的霍乱弧菌株，增菌后分别接种于4号琼脂、TCBS琼脂及庆大霉素琼脂三种培养基中进行分离培养，比较3种培养基成分，观察霍乱弧菌在不同培养基中的菌落特征，统计并对比其检测结果。结果 4号琼脂、TCBS琼脂与庆大霉素琼脂培养基配方成分存在一定差异，其中TCBS琼脂培养基成分种类最多，但三者琼脂含量相同，其pH值无差异（P＞0.05）。霍乱弧菌在4号琼脂、TCBS琼脂与庆大霉素琼脂中的菌落生长特征存在一定差异。本次霍乱弧菌检出率由高至低依次为4号琼脂＞庆大霉素琼脂＞TCBS琼脂（P＜0.05）。结论 4号琼脂、TCBS琼脂与庆大霉素琼脂培养基均可有效分离霍乱弧菌，实现病菌检测，其营养基成分不同、菌落生长表现各异，以4号琼脂培养基的检出效果最佳。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the advantages and disadvantages of No.4 agar, TCBS agar and gentamicin agar in cholera surveillance.Methods From January 2022 to March 2023, the strains of Vibrio cholerae isolated and preserved by the Laboratory Department of Fuliang County Center for Disease Control and Prevention were inoculated into No.4 agar, TCBS agar and gentamicin agar respectively after enrichment for isolation and culture. The composition of the three media was compared, the colony characteristics of Vibrio cholerae in different media were observed, and the detection results were statistically compared.Results There were some differences in the composition of No. 4 agar, TCBS agar and gentamicin agar culture medium. Among them, TCBS agar culture medium had the most kinds of ingredients, but their agar contents were the same, and their pH values had no statistical difference (P>0.05). The colony growth characteristics of Vibrio cholerae in No. 4 agar, TCBS agar and gentamicin agar were different. The detection rate of Vibrio cholerae in this study was ranked from high to low in the order of No. 4 agar, gentamicin agar, and TCBS agar (P<0.05).Conclusion No. 4 agar, TCBS agar and gentamicin agar culture medium can effectively isolate Vibrio cholerae and realize the detection of the bacteria. The composition of the nutrient medium is different, and the colony growth performance is different. The detection effect of No. 4 agar culture medium is the best.

参考文献/References:

[1]杨明强,朱兴荣,林婷,等.漳州市龙海区2018-2021年霍乱弧菌监测结果分析[J].海峡预防医学杂志,2022,28(5):70-71.[2]段刚,王文斟,赵婷,等.分离自免疫力低下患者的5株非O1/O139群霍乱弧菌病原学特征分析[J].预防医学情报杂志,2022,38(10):1392-1396.[3]邱艺燕,欧秀华,陈嘉祥.2011-2018年厦门市集美区霍乱监测结果分析[J].热带病与寄生虫学,2021,19(2):95-97.[4]周霞霞,邱晶磊,杨广,等.传统培养法与荧光PCR法检测弧菌的方法评价[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2021,12(4):1550-1556.[5]Bokma J,Pardon B,Deprez P,et al.Non-specific, agar medium-related peaks can result in false positive Mycoplasma alkalescens and Mycoplasma arginini identification by MALDI-TOF MS[J].Res Vet Sci,2020,130:139-143.[6]Bittar F,Gouriet F,Khelaifia S,et al.FastFung: A novel medium for the culture and isolation of fastidious fungal species from clinical samples[J].J Microbiol Methods,2021,180:106108.[7]舒高林,李东迅,彭华,等.2013-2019年北京市昌平区霍乱弧菌病原学和分子流行病学特征分析[J].疾病监测,2020,35(8):735-741.[8]黄瑛,贾蕾,田祎,等.2015-2021年北京市霍乱弧菌病原学和流行特征分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2022,43(5):734-738.[9]何牧,张爽,张彦春,等.2015-2017年北京市顺义区食源性疾病监测腹泻病例霍乱弧菌感染及病原学特征分析[J].疾病监测,2019,34(6):525-528.[10]罗朝晨,陈爱平,谢芳钦,等.2013-2017年福建省霍乱监测分析[J].预防医学论坛,2019,25(1):1-4.[11]Wangman P,Chaivisuthangkura P,Taengchaiyaphum S,et al.Development of a rapid immunochromatographic strip test for the detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus toxin B that cause acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease[J].J Fish Dis,2020,43(2):207-214.[12]施连琴,徐烨,曹卫中.1962-2018年上海市崇明岛域霍乱流行特征分析[J].上海预防医学,2020,32(9):764-766,772.[13]Surekhamol IS,Deepa GD,Somnath Pai S,et al.Isolation and characterization of broad spectrum bacteriophages lytic to Vibrio harveyi from shrimp farms of Kerala, India[J].Lett Appl Microbiol,2014,58(3):197-204.[14]Iramiot JS,Rwego IB,Kansiime C,et al.Epidemiology and antibiotic susceptibility of Vibrio cholerae associated with the 2017 outbreak in Kasese district, Uganda[J].BMC Public Health,2019,19(1):1405.[15]屠博文,薛银刚,姚萍,等.不同来源的霍乱弧菌毒力特征的质谱学分析[J].食品工业科技,2021,42(06):130-136,150.[16]Iramiot JS,Rwego IB,Kansiime C,et al.Epidemiology and antibiotic susceptibility of Vibrio cholerae associated with the 2017 outbreak in Kasese district, Uganda[J].BMC Public Health,2019,19(1):1405.[17]Ajuzieogu CA,Dyboh IC,Nwobodo DC.Culture-dependent examination of the bacteriological quality of ready-to-eat African salads in Enugu metropolis, Nigeria and antibiotic resistance profile of associated bacteria[J].Heliyon,2022,8(10):e10782.[18]郎中凯,王恒芹.O139型霍乱弧菌在四种4号琼脂培养基上的生长特性研究[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2011,21(4):907-909.[19]Happy AH,Alam MG,Mahmud S,et al.Isolation, Identification and Characterization of Gram Negative Bacteria from Popular Street Food (Chotpoti) at Savar Area, Dhaka, Bangladesh[J].Open Access Library Journal,2018,5(11):1-11.[20]格西克图.用溴麝香草酚兰代替混合指示剂观察缓冲溶液的缓冲作用[J].锡林郭勒职业学院学报,2015(1):40-42. [21]吴三明,李元珍,李国民.一起O139群霍乱疫情的实验室检测方法探讨[J].中国卫生工程学,2014,13(2):153-154,156.[22]Pfeffer C,Oliver JD.A comparison of thiosulphate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose (TCBS) agar and thiosulphate-chloride-iodide (TCI) agar for the isolation of Vibrio species from estuarine environments[J].Lett Appl Microbiol,2003,36(3):150-151.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01