[1]陈新兰.不同微生物检验法对阴道内念珠菌感染情况的检验效果比较[J].医学信息,2023,36(24):144-147.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.24.033]
　CHEN Xin-lan.Effect Comparison of Different Microbiological Tests on Candida Infection in the Vagina[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(24):144-147.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.24.033]
点击复制

不同微生物检验法对阴道内念珠菌感染情况的检验效果比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年24期
页码:
144-147
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2023-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect Comparison of Different Microbiological Tests on Candida Infection in the Vagina
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）24-0144-04
作者:
陈新兰
（万年县人民医院检验科，江西 万年 335500）
Author(s):
CHEN Xin-lan
(Department of Laboratory,Wannian County People’s Hospital,Wannian 335500,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
不同微生物检验法; 阴道内念珠菌; 感染; 检验效果
Keywords:
Different microbiological methods; Candida in vagina; Infection; Test effect
分类号:
R446.5；R711.31
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.24.033
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察不同微生物检验法对阴道内念珠菌感染情况的检验效果。方法 选取2021年1月-2023年1月在我院诊治的63例阴道炎患者为研究对象，以培养鉴定法为金标准，依据检测方法分为显色法（n=21）、真菌荧光染色法（n=21）、革兰染色法（n=21），比较不同检验方法结果、念珠菌检出率以及ROC曲线分析念珠菌感染的诊断效能。结果 真菌荧光染色法阴道内念珠菌感染检验结果与显色法和革兰染色法阳性、阴性检验结果比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；真菌荧光染色法阴道内念珠菌检出率为90.48%，高于显色法的66.67%、革兰染色法的71.43%（P＜0.05）；ROC曲线分析，真菌荧光染色法诊断念珠菌感染敏感性、特异性均高于显色法、革兰染色法（P＜0.05）；真菌荧光染色法、革兰染色法、显色法ROC曲线下面积分别为0.93、0.73、0.74，真菌荧光染色法临床诊断价值更高。结论 真菌荧光染色法对阴道内念珠菌感染情况检验具有显著效果，可提高阳性检出率，为临床治疗提供可靠的参考依据，值得临床应用。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the effect of different microbiological tests on candida infection in vagina.Methods A total of 63 patients with vaginitis diagnosed and treated in our hospital from January 2021 to January 2023 were selected as the research objects. The culture identification method was used as the gold standard. According to the detection methods, they were divided into chromogenic method (n=21), fungal fluorescence staining method (n=21), and Gram staining method (n=21). The results of different test methods, the detection rate of Candida were compared, and the ROC curve were used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of Candida infection.Results The results of Candida infection in vagina by fungal fluorescence staining were significantly different from those of positive and negative test results by chromogenic method and Gram staining method (P<0.05). The detection rate of candida in the vagina by fungal fluorescence staining was 90.48%, which was higher than 66.67% by chromogenic method and 71.43% by Gram staining method (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity of fungal fluorescence staining in the diagnosis of candida infection were higher than those of chromogenic method and Gram staining method (P<0.05). The area under the ROC curve of fungal fluorescence staining, Gram staining and chromogenic method were 0.93, 0.73, 0.74, respectively. The clinical diagnostic value of fungal fluorescence staining was higher.Conclusion Fungal fluorescence staining has a significant effect on the detection of candida infection in the vagina, which can improve the positive detection rate and provide a reliable reference for clinical treatment. It is worthy of clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1]康玲燕.不同微生物测定方法对阴道内念珠菌感染检验的效果比较分析[J].甘肃科技,2021,37(3):108-109,98.[2]汪秀英.CTB染色技术在各种阴道病诊治中的应用[J].医学影像与检验,2018,23(4):218-219.[3]邓洪均.不同微生物检验法对阴道内念珠菌感染情况的检验效果比较[J].现代诊断与治疗,2018,27(2):330-331.[4]刘小琦,杜琼,刘祥琴.阴道分泌物念珠菌感染检测方法对比分析[J].重庆医学,2017,46(35):4927-4929.[5]沈莉,卢红梅,梁芳芳.阴道炎五联检验对阴道炎病原体诊断与白带清洁度检测的应用效果分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2017(1):216-218.[6]顾晓敏.克霉唑阴道片联合硝酸咪康唑治疗妊娠合并念珠菌性阴道炎的疗效观察[J].临床医学,2020,40(10):96-98.[7]陈淼,邬硕平,江唯波,等.不同微生物检验法对念珠菌阴道炎患者阴道分泌物的检验效果比较[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(19):3663-3665.[8]陈雷鸣,陈艺升,李翠.阴道微生物芯片技术在阴道分泌物念珠菌检测中的应用[J].检验医学,2020,35(4):346-348.[9]陈冬丽,龚宝兰.妊娠期阴道念珠菌菌种分布及药敏情况[J].中国真菌学杂志,2019,14(6):362-365.[10]赵磊,殷舟,叶佳铭.不同检测方法诊断妇科炎症真菌感染的对比研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2019,34(24):5608-5610.[11]邝桂星.77例念珠菌感染患者采用微生物对尿沉渣检测结果分析[J].检验医学与临床,2017,10(3):264-265.[12]Peters BM,Palmer GE,Nash AK,et al.Fungal morphog enetic pathways are required for the hallmark inflamm atory response during candida albicans vaginitis[J].Infect Immun,2014,82(2):532-543.[13]晏亮,邓淑文,潘炜华,等.我国外阴阴道念珠菌病致病菌菌种分布及体外药敏研究现状[J].中国真菌学杂志,2018,13(1):46-52.[14]Yano J,Noverr MC,Fidel PL Jr.Cytokines in the host response to Candida vaginitis:Identifying a role for nonclassicalim munemediators,S100 alarmins[J].Cytokine,2012,58(1):118-128.[15]商秀娟,陈笑,李芳秋,等.念珠菌定植引发侵袭性感染早期优势抗原的体液免疫回忆应答[J].医学研究生学报,2017,30(1):21-25.[16]李爱娟,吴宗宝,张传飞,等.探讨FCST在妇女阴道分泌物分离的白色念珠菌药物敏感性检测中的应用[J].浙江临床医学,2018,18(4):691-692.[17]贺政新,王廷廷,单得志,等.自身免疫性疾病患者血清抗白念珠菌烯醇化酶IgG型抗体的检测和分析[J].细胞与分子免疫学杂志,2017,33(8):1113-1117.[18]陈惠瑜,邱华红,方文婷,等.773例女性外阴阴道念珠菌病菌种分布及药敏结果分析[J].实验与检验医学,2020,15(4):161-163.[19]胡春丽.不同微生物检验法对阴道内念珠菌感染情况的检验效果比较研究[J].黑龙江中医药,2021,15(8):37-39.[20]刘小琦,杜琼,刘祥琴,等.阴道分泌物念珠菌感染检测方法对比分析[J].重庆医学,2017,20(12):184-186.[21]崔凡,马虎,王有为,等.四川地区念珠菌性外阴阴道炎快速鉴定和菌种构成研究[J].四川医学,2017,38(6):617-620.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01