[1]皮 颖,聂红星,幸 情.宫颈炎症感染不同微生物检验方法的效果及其对并发宫颈病变的诊断价值研究[J].医学信息,2023,36(24):140-143.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.24.032]
　PI Ying,NIE Hong-xing,XING Qing.Effect of Different Microbiological Test Methods for Cervical Inflammation Infection and its Diagnostic Value for Concurrent Cervical Lesions[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(24):140-143.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.24.032]
点击复制

宫颈炎症感染不同微生物检验方法的效果及其对并发宫颈病变的诊断价值研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年24期
页码:
140-143
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2023-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Different Microbiological Test Methods for Cervical Inflammation Infection and its Diagnostic Value for Concurrent Cervical Lesions
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）24-0140-04
作者:
皮 颖; 聂红星; 幸 情
（高安市中医院检验科，江西 高安 330800）
Author(s):
PI Ying; NIE Hong-xing; XING Qing
(Laboratory Department of Gao’an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Gao’an 330800,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
宫颈炎症; 微生物检验; 细菌感染; 真菌感染; 宫颈病变
Keywords:
Cervicitis; Microbial testing; Bacterial infection; Fungal infection; Cervical lesions
分类号:
R711.32
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.24.032
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究不同微生物检验方法对宫颈炎症感染及其宫颈病变的诊断价值。方法 以2021年1月-2023年1月高安市中医院收治的62例宫颈炎症感染患者为研究对象。采集其宫颈分泌物样本，分别行微生物培养法与镜检法，比较培养法与镜检法对不同病原体的阳性检出率，统计其阳性检验者的宫颈病变诊断结果，分析培养法与镜检法在宫颈炎症合并宫颈病变诊断中的应用价值。结果 培养法对宫颈炎症病原体的阳性检出率高于镜检法（P＜0.05）。培养法阳性者与镜检法阳性者的宫颈病变诊断结果比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。培养法对宫颈炎症并发宫颈病变的诊断敏感度、特异度、准确性均高于镜检法（P＜0.05）。结论 培养法与镜检法均可用于宫颈炎症感染的微生物检验。其中，培养法对病原体的阳性检出率相对更高，其在宫颈病变诊断中具有积极评估价值。
Abstract:
Objective To study the diagnostic value of different microbiological test methods for cervical inflammatory infection and cervical lesions.Methods A total of 62 patients with cervical inflammatory infection admitted to Gao’an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2021 to January 2023 were studied. The samples of cervical secretions were collected, and the microbial culture method and microscopic examination method were carried out respectively. The positive detection rates of different pathogens by culture method and microscopic examination method were compared, and the diagnostic results of cervical lesions by positive test were counted. The application value of culture method and microscopic examination method in the diagnosis of cervical inflammation complicated with cervical lesions was analyzed.Results The positive detection rate of cervical inflammatory pathogens by culture method was higher than that by microscopy (P<0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the diagnosis of cervical lesions between the positive culture method and the positive microscopic examination method (P<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of culture method in the diagnosis of cervical inflammation complicated with cervical lesions were higher than those of microscopy (P<0.05).Conclusion Both culture and microscopy methods can be used for microbiological testing of cervical inflammation infections. Among them, the positive detection rate of pathogens by culture method is relatively higher, which has positive evaluation value in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘蓓蓓,朱意玲,章文华,等.128例阴道镜检查宫颈多点活检和宫颈管诊刮术诊断宫颈病变的临床价值[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2018,40(7):539-542.[2]Kumari S,Vikrant MB.Association of cervicovaginal dysbiosis mediated HPV infection in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J].Microbial Pathogenesis,2021,152(1):784-787.[3]赵智萍.HPV感染宫颈癌患者阴道菌群及宫颈炎性因子表达分析[J].实用癌症杂志,2021,36(9):1490-1493.[4]刘化勇,刘学军,高永丽,等.阴道微生物菌群及宫颈局部免疫功能与宫颈上皮内瘤变的相关性分析[J].中国病原生物学杂志,2021,16(7):805-808,813.[5]罗晶,李婷婷,王倩,等.液基薄层细胞学检查、人乳头状瘤病毒检测及阴道镜检查在宫颈癌前病变及宫颈癌筛查中的应用价值[J].新乡医学院学报,2021,38(5):427-430,435.[6]陈淼,邬硕平,江唯波,等.不同微生物检验法对念珠菌阴道炎患者阴道分泌物的检验效果比较[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(19):3663-3665.[7]Naji EN,Khelkal IN,Aziz FN,et al.Cytological and microbial investigation of cervicitisby endocervical cytobrushe smear in some iraqi women patients[J].Journal of Global Pharma Technology,2017,9(12):380-388.[8]苏广龙,林玉婷,姜雪梅.2000例孕25~32周妇女宫颈分泌物中的细菌培养结果及耐药性分析[J].广西医学,2020,42(15):2001-2004.[9]卞晓翠,王晓婉,杨振丽,等.联合使用聚合酶链式反应和培养法可以提高培养细胞支原体的检出率[J].医学研究杂志,2018,47(6):28-34.[10]程向方,张焱.区级医院妇科患者宫颈分泌物中支原体培养及药敏结果调查分析[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2020,30(9):1144-1146.[11]Nye M,Osiecki J,Lewinski M,et al.Detection ofChlamydia trachomatisandNeisseria gonorrhoeaewith the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Qxand GC Qxamplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays[J].Sexually Transmitted Infections,2019,95(2):87-93.[12]Tandon D,Patil A,Pramanik J,et al.Cross sectional study to evaluate microbiological spectrum of RTI/STI and co-infections among women with cervicitis or cervico-vaginitis from a community clinic in Mumbai[J].Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology,2021,40(1):144-146.[13]Rekha S,Nooren M,Kalyan S,et al.Occurrence of Mycoplasma genitalium in the peritoneal fluid of fertile and infertile women with detailed analysis among infertile women[J].Microbial Pathogenesis,2019,129(1):183-186.[14]吴君梅,郭宝芝,刘爱珍,等.宫颈上皮内瘤变与宫颈微生物群落结构的相关性[J].中国微生态学杂志,2020,32(2):211-214,223.[15]吴鸿君,代莉,司志霖,等.固体培养法、液体培养法及聚合酶链反应法对女性泌尿生殖系统支原体感染检测价值及药敏分析[J].临床军医杂志,2018,46(12):1434-1436.[16]周柯,马腾远,邢国征,等.妇女阴道微生物群落构成与宫颈癌前病变的关系[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2018,25(9):1046-1050.[17]贾忠兰,许丽风.液体-固体联合培养法检测泌尿生殖道支原体的临床研究[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2018,56(10):110-113,118.[18]黎世贵,李素芳,陈丽玲.宫颈炎症感染不同微生物检验方法的效果及其对并发宫颈病变的诊断价值研究[J].中国性科学,2020,29(6):43-46.[19]张永红,夏良海,方师群.妇科病患者宫颈分泌物支原体培养及药敏结果[J].热带医学杂志,2018,18(1):72-74,85.[20]陈月洁.PCR检验法和细菌培养法在阴道细菌检验中的效果对比[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2019(1):786-787.[21]赵野,姜日花,朱明姬,等.荧光染色镜检法与KOH湿片镜检法在皮肤浅部真菌感染诊断中的应用[J].中国实验诊断学,2021,25(12):1810-1812.[22]杨泽权.探讨妇科炎症感染患者不同微生物检验方法的诊断效果[J].医学检验与临床,2020,31(10):52-54.[23]Feng RM,Z Wang M,Smith JS,et al.Risk of high-risk human papillomavirus infection and cervical precancerous lesions with past or current trichomonas infection: a pooled analysis of 25,054 women in rural China[J].Journal of Clinical Virology,2018,99-100:84-90.[24]Dahoud W,Michael CW,Gokozan H,et al.Association of Bacterial Vaginosis and Human Papilloma Virus Infection With Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions[J].American Journal of Clinical Pathology,2019,152(2):185-189.

相似文献/References:

[1]梁鸿雁,曾利华,黄兰芳,等.细菌性食物中毒病原学情况及微生物检验分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(22):86.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.22.016]
　LIANG Hong-yan,ZENG Li-hua,HUANG Lan-fang,et al.Analysis of Etiology and Microbiological Test of Bacterial Food Poisoning[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(24):86.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.22.016]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01