[1]雷 明.微创穿刺引流联合开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血 并发脑疝临床效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(07):89-91.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.028]
 LEI Ming.Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Puncture Drainage Combined with Craniotomy Hematoma in the Treatment of Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage Complicated with Cerebral Hernia[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(07):89-91.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.028]
点击复制

微创穿刺引流联合开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血 并发脑疝临床效果观察()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年07期
页码:
89-91
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2018-04-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Puncture Drainage Combined with Craniotomy Hematoma in the Treatment of Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage Complicated with Cerebral Hernia
文章编号:
1006-1959(2018)07-0089-03
作者:
雷 明
长宁县中医医院外一科,四川 长宁 644300
Author(s):
LEI Ming
Department of Surgery,Subject One,Changning County Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Changning 644300,Sichuan,China
关键词:
高血压脑出血脑疝微创穿刺引流
Keywords:
Key words:Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhageBrain herniaMinimally invasive puncture and drainage
分类号:
R651.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.028
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究微创穿刺引流联合开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血并发脑疝患者的临床效果。方法 选取2015年5月~2017年2月我院52例高血压脑出血并发脑疝患者,按随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组26例。对照组采用开颅血肿清除术联合去骨瓣减压术治疗,观察组采取微创穿刺引流+开颅血肿清除术+去骨瓣减压术治疗,治疗后随访6个月,对比两组临床效果、并发症发生率、预后状况(GOS)分级及预后生活质量(HPLP-Ⅱ)评分。结果 观察组治疗总有效率高于对照组(96.15% vs. 69.23%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率低于对照组(11.54% vs. 38.46%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组GOS分级优于对照组,HPLP-Ⅱ评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 高血压脑出血并发脑疝患者采取微创穿刺引流联合开颅血肿清除术治疗,可提高治疗有效率,减少并发症,改善预后康复状况及生活质量水平。
Abstract:
Abstract:Objective To study the clinical effect of minimally invasive puncture and drainage combined with craniotomy for the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage complicated with cerebral hernia.Methods 52 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage complicated with cerebral hernia from May 2015 to February 2017 were randomly divided into two groups:observation group(n=26)and control group(n=26).The control group was treated by craniotomy combined with bone flap decompression,the observation group was treated by minimally invasive puncture drainage+craniotomy and hematoma removal+decompressive craniectomy.After 6 months follow-up, the clinical efficacy,complication rate,prognosis(GOS)grade and prognosis quality of life (HPLP-II) score of the two groups were compared.Results The total efficiency of the observation group is higher than that of control group(96.15%vs.69.23%),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the incidence of complications in observation group lower than in the control group(11.54%vs.38.46%),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the observation group GOS grade better than the control group,HPLP-Ⅱ score higher than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage complicated with cerebral hernia is treated by minimally invasive puncture drainage combined with craniotomy and evacuation of hematoma.It can improve the treatment efficiency,reduce complications,improve prognosis,rehabilitation status and quality of life.

参考文献/References:

[1]徐明.微创穿刺血肿引流术与小骨窗血肿清除术及常规方法治疗老年高血压脑出血的疗效比较[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2014,13(13):1083-1086. [2]陈艾,苏俊,江才永,等.微创穿刺引流术与小骨窗开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血疗效比较[J].中国临床研究,2017,30(2):217-219. [3]刘道清,江敏,周志娟,等.小骨窗开颅血肿清除术与微创穿刺引流术治疗高血压脑出血疗效比较[J].医学综述,2014,20(15):2807-2809. [4]曹文君,郭颖,平卫伟,等.HPLP-Ⅱ健康促进生活方式量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2016,20(3):286-289. [5]司金春,肖志强,许志杰,等.颞部小骨窗血肿清除术与传统大骨瓣开颅治疗基底节区高血压性脑出血合并脑疝的疗效对比[J].中国医师杂志,2015,17(1):106-108. [6]刘海波,杨中鑫,范英俊,等.高血压脑出血脑疝手术效果及影响因素分析[J].现代仪器与医疗,2017,23(1):53-55. [7]时雷.微创穿刺血肿清除术治疗老年高血压基底核区脑出血的疗效[J].神经损伤与功能重建,2016,11(4):344-345. [8]黄孝国,徐青,孟祥靖.颞肌下骨瓣开颅在高血压脑出血早期脑疝患者中的应用效果[J].中国综合临床,2016,32(8):701-703. [9]郑鲲,谭娟,冯辉斌,等.微创穿刺引流联合开颅血肿清除术对高血压脑出血合并脑疝患者预后的影响[J].山东医药,2015,55(30):74-75. [10]曲新国,罗俊杰.额颞小骨瓣开颅术治疗高血压性基底节区脑出血并脑疝疗效观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2016,25(22):2449-2451.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘伟兰,罗丽珍.围手术护理干预在高血压脑出血小骨窗开颅血肿清除术中的效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(02):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.064]
 LIU Wei-lan,LUO Li-zhen.Effect of Perioperative Nursing Intervention on Craniotomy Hematoma Clearance of Small Bone Window in Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(07):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.064]
[2]韩 冬.小骨窗血肿清除术与微创穿刺血肿引流术治疗 高血压脑出血的效果比较[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.035]
 HAN Dong.Comparison of Small Window Hematoma Clearance and Minimally Invasive Hematoma Drainage in the Treatment of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(07):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.035]
[3]陈春香,顾宇丹.循证护理干预对高血压脑出血与患者心理状态恢复及 并发症的影响[J].医学信息,2018,31(14):180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.057]
 CHEN Chun-xiang,GU Yu-dan.Effect of Evidence-based Nursing Intervention on Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage and Recovery of Patients' Psychological State and Complications[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(07):180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.057]
[4]陈加富,陈新生.右正中神经电刺激对高血压脑出血后昏迷患者早期促醒治疗的研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(22):85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.22.023]
 CHEN Jia-fu,CHEN Xin-sheng.Study of the Clinical Effect of the Early Right Median Nerve Electrical Stimulation to Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage-induced Coma[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(07):85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.22.023]
[5]王春城.神经内镜辅助对高血压脑出血中患者神经缺损及安全性的影响[J].医学信息,2019,32(08):139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.08.041]
 WANG Chun-cheng.Effect of Neuroendoscopy on Neurological Deficit and Safety in Patients with Hypertensive Brain Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(07):139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.08.041]
[6]刘 宏,吴政俊,何明方.开颅减压结合脑室外引流术对高血压脑出血破入脑室 感染及预后的影响[J].医学信息,2019,32(12):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.035]
 LIU Hong,WU Zheng-jun,HE Ming-fang.Effect of Craniotomy and Decompression Combined with Extraventricular Drainage on Cerebral Ventricular Infection and Prognosis of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(07):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.035]
[7]韩 晋,陈淑媛,董瑞宾,等.神经生长因子与盐酸氟桂利嗪联合治疗高血压脑出血的疗效[J].医学信息,2019,32(21):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.21.025]
 HAN Jin,CHEN Shu-yuan,DONG Rui-bin,et al.Effect of Nerve Growth Factor Combined with Flunarizine Hydrochloride on Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(07):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.21.025]
[8]赵 雷,封浩野.血肿穿刺引流术与开颅手术治疗高血压脑出血疗效比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(12):136.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.12.036]
 ZHAO Lei,FENG Hao-ye.Comparison of Curative Effect Between Hematoma Puncture Drainage and Craniotomy in the Treatment of Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(07):136.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.12.036]
[9]袁新春,董 伟,潘泰峰.血清D-二聚体水平与高血压脑出血患者病情严重程度及术后预后的关系[J].医学信息,2022,35(13):165.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.13.041]
 YUAN Xin-chun,DONG Wei,PAN Tai-feng.The Relationship Between Serum D-dimer Level and the Severity and Postoperative Prognosis of Patients with Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(07):165.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.13.041]
[10]吴六仔.纳络酮联合局部亚低温治疗高血压脑出血的疗效及对患者神经功能恢复、认知改善的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(16):125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.031]
 WU Liu-zi.Effect of Naloxone Combined with Local Mild Hypothermia on Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage and its Effect on Neurological Function Recovery and Cognitive Improvement[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(07):125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.031]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-04-01