[1]付 晶,章兰英,朱小凤,等.产程中剖宫产时期的选择对产后盆腔器官功能的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(19):103-105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.19.028]
　FU Jing,ZHANG Lan-ying,ZHU Xiao-feng,et al.The Effect of the Choice of Cesarean Section Period During Labor on Postpartum Pelvic Organ Function[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(19):103-105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.19.028]
点击复制

产程中剖宫产时期的选择对产后盆腔器官功能的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年19期
页码:
103-105
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-10-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Effect of the Choice of Cesarean Section Period During Labor on Postpartum Pelvic Organ Function
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）19-0103-03
作者:
付 晶; 章兰英; 朱小凤; 等
（上高县人民医院妇产科，江西 上高 336400）
Author(s):
FU Jing; ZHANG Lan-ying; ZHU Xiao-feng; et al.
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Shanggao People’s Hospital,Shanggao 336400,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
盆腔功能; 剖宫产; 产后; 时期选择
Keywords:
Pelvic function; Cesarean section; Postpartum; Period selection
分类号:
R714.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.19.028
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探索产程中剖宫产时期的选择对产后盆腔器官功能的影响。方法 选取2018年7月-2020年7月我院90产妇例作为研究对象，其中未临产30例设为A组，临产早期（宫口开大＜6 cm）30例设为B组，临产晚期（宫口开大≥6 cm）30例设为C组。比较三组产后6~8周盆腔器官功能检查结果、盆腔器官脱垂（POP）、压力性尿失禁（SUI）情况及盆底肌评分。结果 B组和C组静息、缩肛和Valsalva动作状态下肛裂孔前后径、横径、横截面积、膀胱尿道后角均低于A组，且B组低于C组（P＜0.05）；C组产后6~8周POP发生率、SUI发生率均低于A组与B组（P＜0.05）；C组盆底肌力评分与A、B组比较（P＜0.05）。结论 剖宫产的时期选择会对盆腔器官功能产生影响，产程中较早剖宫产对盆腔器官功能影响较小。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effect of cesarean section during labor on postpartum pelvic organ function.Methods A total of 90 parturients of our hospital from July 2018 to July 2020 were selected as the research objects. Among them, 30 cases without labor were set as group A, 30 cases in the early stage of labor (cervical dilatation <6 cm) were set as group B, and 30 cases in the late stage of labor (cervical dilatation ≥ 6 cm) were set as group C. The results of pelvic organ function examination, pelvic organ prolapse (POP), stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic floor muscle score were compared among the three groups at 6-8 weeks postpartum.Results The anteroposterior diameter, transverse diameter, cross-sectional area and posterior vesicourethral angle of anal fissure in group B and group C were lower than those in group A at rest, anal contraction and Valsalva action, and those in group B were lower than those in group C (P<0.05). The incidence of POP and SUI in group C was lower than that in group A and group B at 6-8 weeks postpartum(P<0.05). There was significant difference in pelvic floor muscle score between group C and groups A and B (P<0.05).Conclusion The choice of cesarean section has influence on pelvic organ function, and early cesarean section has little influence on pelvic organ function.

参考文献/References:

[1]Blomquist JL,Munoz A,Carroll M,et al.Association of Delivery Mode With Pelvic Floor Disorders After Childbirth[J].JAMA,2018,320(23):2438-2447.[2]Maskey S,Bajracharya M,Bhandari S.Prevalence of Cesarean Section and Its Indications in A Tertiary Care Hospital[J].JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc,2019,57(216):70-73.[3]Nelson DB,McIntire DD,Leveno KJ.Second-stage labor: consensus versus science[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2020,222(2):144-149.[4]Pardo E,Rotem R,Glinter H,et al.Is there a correlation between pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms during pregnancy and the duration of the second stage of labor?[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2021,17:1-6.[5]Fan C,Guidolin D,Ragazzo S,et al.Effects of Cesarean Section and Vaginal Delivery on Abdominal Muscles and Fasciae[J].Medicina (Kaunas),2020,56(6):260.[6]Walker KF,Kibuka M,Thornton JG,et al.Maternal position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2018,11(11):CD008070.[7]Rusavy Z,Francova E,Paymova L,et al.Timing of cesarean and its impact on labor duration and genital tract trauma at the first subsequent vaginal birth:a retrospective cohort study[J].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2019,19(1):207.[8]Knigin D,Ezra Y,Ben-David A,et al.The continuum of a prolonged labor and a second stage cesarean delivery[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2021,24:1-5.[9]Williams KS,Rosen L,Pilkinton ML,et al.Putting POP-Q to the test: does C - D = cervical length? [J].Int Urogynecol J,2018,29(6):881-885.[10]Tang L,Liao K,Jiang W,et al.Comparison of cervical length measured by POP-Q C-D and MRI:Why is POP-Q C-D not accurate? [J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2020,244:76-80.[11]Azadi A,Casey S,Ramanujam P,et al.Repair of Posterior Vaginal Wall Defect Using Biologic Graft for Stage III-POP-Q Pelvic Organ Prolapse in a Patient with History of a J-Pouch[J].Case Rep Obstet Gynecol,2020,2020:8892014.[12]Ostrzenski A.Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification(POP-Q) system needs revision or abandonment:The anatomy study[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2021,267:42-48.[13]Vellucci F,Regini C,Barbanti C,et al.Pelvic floor evaluation with transperineal ultrasound: a new approach[J].Minerva Ginecol,2018,70(1):58-68.[14]Eisenberg VH,Valsky DV,Yagel S.Transperineal ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincter after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI)[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2019,53(2):158-165.[15]Del Forno S,Arena A,Alessandrini M,et al.Transperineal Ultrasound Visual Feedback Assisted Pelvic Floor Muscle Physiotherapy in Women With Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis and Dyspareunia: A Pilot Study[J].J Sex Marital Ther,2020,46(7):603-611.[16]Voll?覬yhaug I,Rojas RG,M?覬rkved S,et al.Comparison of transperineal ultrasound with POP-Q for assessing symptoms of prolapse[J].Int Urogynecol J,2019,30(4):595-602.[17]Youssef A,Brunelli E,Montaguti E,et al.Transperineal ultrasound assessment of maternal pelvic floor at term and fetal head engagement[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2020,56(6):921-927.[18]Nyhus M?覫,Oversand SH,Salvesen ?覫,et al.Ultrasound assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction:reliability and development of an ultrasound-based contraction scale[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2020,55(1):125-131.[19]García-Mejido JA,Fernández-Palacín A,Bonomi-Barby MJ,et al.Online learning for 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound of the pelvic floor[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2020,33(16):2805-2811.[20]Juez L,Núｎez-Córdoba JM,Couso N,et al.Hypopressive technique versus pelvic floor muscle training for postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation: A prospective cohort study[J].Neurourol Urodyn,2019,38(7):1924-1931.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘汉芬.剖宫产术后护理干预对产妇康复效果的影响分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(01):169.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.01.067]
　LIU Han-fen.Effect of Nursing Intervention on Maternal Rehabilitation after Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):169.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.01.067]
[2]刘 礼.影响剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫足月分娩结局的相关因素分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(02):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.039]
　LIU Li.Analysis of Related Factors Influencing the Outcome of Full Term Delivery of Scar Uterus after Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.039]
[3]李 欢,刘 俊,夏军辉.妊娠期高血压疾病患者血浆Pro BNP水平及其临床意义[J].医学信息,2018,31(04):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.059]
　LI Huan,LIU Jun,XIA Jun-hui.Plasma Pro BNP Levels in Patients with Hypertensive Disorder Complicating Pregnancy and their Clinical Significance[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.059]
[4]鲁秋彤.经阴道彩色多普勒超声在诊断剖宫产子宫疤痕妊娠中的 价值研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):160.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.058]
　LU Qiu-tong.The Value of Transvaginal Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):160.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.058]
[5]蒋红梅.子宫下段横形环状压迫缝合术治疗前置胎盘剖宫产术中 胎盘剥离面出血的临床研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(07):120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.040]
　JIANG Hong-mei.Clinical Study on the Treatment of Placental Exfoliation Bleeding in Caesarean Section of Placenta Previa by Transverse Annular Compression Suture of Lower Uterine Segment[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.040]
[6]冉会仁.小剂量舒芬太尼在剖宫产术麻醉中预防寒战及 牵拉痛的疗效评价[J].医学信息,2018,31(08):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.08.032]
　RAN Hui-ren.Evaluation of the Efficacy of Low-dose Sufentanil in Preventing Chills and Pulling Pain during Cesarean Section Anesthesia[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.08.032]
[7]王玉霞.剖宫产术后子宫疤痕妊娠的临床诊治[J].医学信息,2018,31(10):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.015]
　WANG Yu-xia.Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Uterine Scar Pregnancy after Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.015]
[8]熊 丽,蒋明珉,何娅娟.以护士为主导的疼痛管理模式在剖宫产围手术期的应用研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(01):179.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.01.058]
　XIONG Li,JIANG Ming-min,HE Ya-juan.Application Study of Nurse-led Pain Management Model in Perioperative Period of Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(19):179.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.01.058]
[9]王 颖,石显江,陈斯乔,等.多巴胺预注射在剖宫产腰硬联合麻醉的临床应用[J].医学信息,2019,32(11):150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.11.044]
　WANG Ying,SHI Xian-jiang,CHEN Si-qiao,et al.Clinical Application of Dopamine Pre-injection in Cesarean Section Combined with Spinal Anesthesia[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(19):150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.11.044]
[10]龙俊青.臀位外倒转术的应用研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(12):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.019]
　LONG Jun-qing.Application Study of Breech Presentation[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(19):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.019]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01