[1]潘喜梅.白带常规与干化学法快速检测对阴道感染的诊断意义[J].医学信息,2024,37(19):145-147.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.19.030]
　PAN Ximei.Diagnostic Significance of Leucorrhea Routine and Rapid Detection of Dry Chemical Method for Vaginal Infection[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(19):145-147.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.19.030]
点击复制

白带常规与干化学法快速检测对阴道感染的诊断意义()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年19期
页码:
145-147
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2024-10-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Diagnostic Significance of Leucorrhea Routine and Rapid Detection of Dry Chemical Method for Vaginal Infection
文章编号:
1006-1959（2024）19-0145-03
作者:
潘喜梅
婺源县妇幼保健院检验科，江西 婺源 333200
Author(s):
PAN Ximei
Laboratory Department of Wuyuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Wuyuan 333200,Jiangxi,China
关键词:
白带常规; 干化学法; 阴道感染
Keywords:
Leucorrhea routine; Dry chemical method; Vaginal infection
分类号:
R446
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.19.030
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究白带常规与干化学法快速检测对阴道感染的诊断意义。方法 选取2022年3月-2023年3月在我院就诊的80例妇科患者为研究对象，均经白带常规与干化学法快速检测，比较不同检测方法对阴道分泌物清洁度的检测结果、鉴别诊断阴道感染类型结果、pH检测结果以及对念珠菌性、乳酸杆菌、滴虫性阴道炎检测准确性。结果 白带常规检测阴道分泌物清洁度Ⅰ/Ⅱ级、Ⅲ/Ⅳ级检出率与干化学法快速检测比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；白带常规检测AV检出率低于干化学法快速检测（P＜0.05），BV、混合感染检出率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；白带常规检测pH＞4.5检出率大于干化学法快速检测（P＜0.05）；干化法快速检测对念珠菌性、乳酸杆菌、滴虫性阴道炎检测准确性与白带常规比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 白带常规与干化学法快速检测对常见阴道炎准确性、阴道分泌物清洁度检测结果基本一致，但在鉴别诊断阴道感染类型和pH方面存在差异。虽然干化学法快速检测操作简便，但是不能完全替代白带常规进行检测。临床可以将两种检测方式联合使用，相辅相成，以为阴道感染诊治提供更可靠的参考依据。
Abstract:
Objective To study the diagnostic significance of leucorrhea routine and rapid detection of dry chemical methods for vaginal infection.Methods A total of 80 gynecological patients who were treated in our hospital from March 2022 to March 2023 were selected as the research objects. All of them were rapidly detected by leucorrhea routine and dry chemical methods. The results of different detection methods on the cleanliness of vaginal secretions, the results of differential diagnosis of vaginal infection types, the results of pH detection and the accuracy of detection of candida, lactobacillus and trichomonal vaginitis were compared.Results There was no significant difference in the detection rate of vaginal secretion cleanliness grade Ⅰ/Ⅱ and grade Ⅲ/Ⅳ between leucorrhea routine detection and rapid detection of dry chemical method (P>0.05). The detection rate of AV by leucorrhea routine detection was lower than that by rapid detection of dry chemical method (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the detection rate of BV and mixed infection (P>0.05). The detection rate of pH>4.5 in leucorrhea routine detection was higher than that of rapid detection of dry chemical method (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the accuracy of rapid detection of candida, lactobacillus and trichomonal vaginitis between rapid detection of dry chemical method and leucorrhea routine detection (P>0.05).Conclusion The accuracy of leucorrhea routine and rapid detection of dry chemical method for common vaginitis and the cleanliness of vaginal secretions are basically the same, but there are differences in the differential diagnosis of vaginal infection types and pH. Although the dry chemical method is simple to operate, it cannot completely replace the leucorrhea routine detection. Clinically, the two detection methods can be used in combination to complement each other, so as to provide a more reliable basis for the diagnosis and treatment of vaginal infection.

参考文献/References:

[1]李剑.阴道涂片检查快速染色在白带常规检验中的应用[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2017,27(4):73-74.[2]李汶轩,曹影,冯晓昀.白带常规及BV五项检测对妊娠期阴道感染诊断价值探讨[J].社区医学杂志,2022,20(13):738-741.[3]张彩霞,王玲华,杜宗孝.瑞氏染色法与悬浮法检测白带常规项目的对比研究[J].宁夏医学杂志,2022,44(2):174-175.[4]夏姗,熊嫚.阴道炎五联检验在阴道炎病原体诊断与白带清洁度检测中的应用[J].泰山医学院学报,2017,38(5):517-518.[5]李海霞,郭春秀,杨保军,等.妊娠早期阴道微生态与宫颈人乳头瘤病毒感染临床特点分析[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2020,12(6):20-24,47.[6]卢珍,沈涌海,王智毅.白带常规及BV三项检测在妊娠期妇女阴道感染诊断中的应用[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2019,11(5):241-243.[7]王晶莹,卢云.阴道唾液酸酶法检测在细菌性阴道病中的诊断价值[J].中国乡村医药,2018,15(12):14-26.[8]喻织云.分析白带标志物在妇科病筛查检测中的鉴别价值[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(1):36-37.[9]沈甍.需氧菌性阴道炎、细菌性阴道病五项联合检测在阴道微生态评价中的应用价值[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2017,42(4):502-504.[10]刘卓英,许鸣,叶淑芬.细菌性阴道病BV蓝快速检测的应用分析[J]黑龙江科学,2018,9（2）:2364-2367.[11]马勇.阴道炎五联检验法在白带清洁度、病原体诊断中的应用价值[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2017,25(6):411-414.[12]杨艳红.唾液酸酶联合白带常规检测对细菌性阴道病的诊断价值[J].国际检验医学志, 2017,22(14):17-22.[13]庞卓超,叶翠芬,聂润球,等．428例育龄期妇女阴道感染情况调查[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(15):3623-3626．[14]祝小欢,俞冠东.阴道混合感染患者阴道菌群分布特征及感染相关危险因素分析[J].东南国防医药,2019,20(7):126-130.[15]蒯守刚,尚忠波,尚乐乐,等.阴道分泌物常规检查联合5项检测系统在阴道炎中的临床应用[J].中国实验诊断学,2020,25(12):212-214.[16]孙艺歌,陈小贝,张文莉,等.高通量测序技术在阴道感染性疾病的病原鉴定及诊断中的应用[J].中国微生态学杂志,2021,15(10):283-285.[17]侯海平.爱必维五项联合白带常规对女性阴道微生态异常检出率的影响[J].哈尔滨医药,2019,25(4):42-45.[18]李金凤.2178例女性阴道分泌物检测结果的临床分析[J].国际检验医学杂志,2017,30(7):108-110.[19]何萍,李春莉,杨晓煜.455例阴道分泌物病原菌检测及药敏情况分析[J].重庆医学,2017,30(7):59-62.[20]屈海蓉,窦雪艳,杨波,等.阴道微生态评价系统在检测阴道感染中的应用[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2019,30(12):328-330.

相似文献/References:

[1]宋培培.干化学法与尿沉渣分析仪法检测儿童尿液标本的结果比较[J].医学信息,2020,33(13):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.13.052]
　SONG Pei-pei.Comparison Between the Results of Dry Chemistry and Urine Sediment Analyzer in Detecting Urine Samples of Children[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(19):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.13.052]
[2]孙言非,白经纬,王 然.尿常规干化学法联合尿沉渣镜检对尿白细胞、红细胞及尿蛋白的检验价值分析[J].医学信息,2023,36(13):134.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.13.028]
　SUN Yan-fei,BAI Jing-wei,WANG Ran.Value of Urine Routine Dry Chemical Method Combined with Urine Sediment Microscopy in the Detection of Urine White Blood Cells, Red Blood Cells and Urine Protein[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(19):134.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.13.028]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01