[1]彭雄兵,钟英亮,金海涛.经尿道前列腺电切剜除术对前列腺术后尿失禁及机体应激反应的影响[J].医学信息,2024,37(21):99-102.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.21.022]
 PENG Xiongbing,ZHONG Yingliang,JIN Haitao.Effect of Transurethral Resection of the Prostateon Urinary Incontinence and Stress Response After Prostate Surgery[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(21):99-102.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.21.022]
点击复制

经尿道前列腺电切剜除术对前列腺术后尿失禁及机体应激反应的影响()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年21期
页码:
99-102
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2024-11-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Transurethral Resection of the Prostateon Urinary Incontinence and Stress Response After Prostate Surgery
文章编号:
1006-1959(2024)21-0099-04
作者:
彭雄兵钟英亮金海涛
宁都县人民医院泌尿外科,江西 宁都 342800
Author(s):
PENG XiongbingZHONG YingliangJIN Haitao
Department of Urology,Ningdu County People’s Hospital,Ningdu 342800,Jiangxi,China
关键词:
经尿道前列腺电切术经尿道前列腺剜除术术后尿失禁机体应激反应术中出血量
Keywords:
Transurethral resection of the prostateTransurethral enucleation of the prostatePostoperative urinary incontinenceThe body’s stress responseIntraoperative bleeding volume
分类号:
R699
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.21.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)与经尿道前列腺剜除术(TUEP)对前列腺术后尿失禁及机体应激反应的影响。方法 以2022年1月-2023年9月宁都县人民医院泌尿外科收治的60例良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者为研究对象,经随机数字表法分为TURP组与TUEP组,各30例。TURP行经尿道前列腺电切术治疗,TUEP组应用经尿道前列腺剜除术治疗,比较两组手术相关指标(术中出血量、手术时间、腺体切除质量、术后冲洗液转清时间)、血红蛋白(Hb)及血钠指标、尿失禁发生率、机体应激反应[肾上腺素(A)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)、肾素(PRA)、血管紧张素Ⅱ(AngⅡ)]、术后并发症情况。结果 TUEP组术中出血量、手术时间、术后冲洗液转清时间少于TURP组,腺体切除质量大于TURP组(P<0.05);两组术后Hb、血钠水平均有下降,但TUEP组术后Hb、血钠水平高于TURP组(P<0.05)。TUEP组术后尿失禁发生率(3.33%)低于TURP组(20.00%)(P<0.05)。TUEP组术中及术后6 h机体应激反应指标(A、NE、PRA、AngⅡ)均低于TURP组(P<0.05)。TUEP组术后并发症发生率(10.00%)低于TURP组(30.00%)(P<0.05)。结论 TUEP可降低前列腺术后尿失禁及并发症的发生风险,且术中出血少、手术时间短、腺体切除彻底,可减轻术中及术后机体应激反应,减少Hb及血钠流失,相较于TURP具有更高的临床优势。
Abstract:
Objective To study the effects of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and transurethral enucleation of the prostate (TUEP) on urinary incontinence and stress response after prostate surgery.Methods Sixty patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) admitted to the Department of Urology of Ningdu County People’s Hospital from January 2022 to September 2023 were enrolled in the study. They were divided into TURP group and TUEP group by random number table method, with 30 patients in each group. TURP was treated with transurethral resection of the prostate, and TUEP group was treated with transurethral enucleation of the prostate. The operation-related indicators (intraoperative blood loss, operation time, gland resection quality, postoperative flushing fluid clearance time), hemoglobin (Hb) and blood sodium index, incidence of urinary incontinence, body stress response [epinephrine (A), norepinephrine (NE), renin (PRA), angiotensin Ⅱ (AngⅡ)], and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results The intraoperative blood loss, operation time and postoperative irrigation fluid clearance time in the TUEP group were less than those in the TURP group, and the weight of gland resection was greater than that in the TURP group (P<0.05). The levels of Hb and serum sodium in the two groups decreased after operation, but the levels of Hb and serum sodium in the TUEP group were higher than those in the TURP group(P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence in TUEP group (3.33%) was lower than that in TURP group (20.00%) (P<0.05). The stress response indexes (A, NE, PRA, AngⅡ) of TUEP group were lower than those of TURP group during operation and 6 h after operation (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in TUEP group (10.00%) was lower than that in TURP group (30.00%) (P<0.05).Conclusion TUEP can reduce the risk of urinary incontinence and complications after prostate surgery, with less intraoperative bleeding, shorter operation time, and complete gland resection. Meanwhile, it can reduce intraoperative and postoperative stress response, reduce Hb and blood sodium loss, and has higher clinical advantages than TURP.

参考文献/References:

[1]胡伟强,高海权.经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术与电切术治疗高危良性前列腺增生症的临床观察[J].贵州医药,2023,47(8):1250-1252.[2]张秋华,李云祥,胡蓉,等.经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术和经尿道前列腺电切术对良性前列腺增生患者尿流率残余尿量和性功能的影响[J].河北医学,2023,29(6):1015-1020.[3]金坤,柳长坤,朱良勇,等.前列腺穿刺术后早期行TURP与HoLEP的安全性及疗效对比[J].重庆医学,2022,51(19):3339-3343.[4]车新艳,于书慧,王为,等.经尿道前列腺电切术和铥激光剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的早期尿控分析[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2022,11(3):194-198.[5]覃斌,覃鹤林,吴清国,等.经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2022,22(1):48-54.[6]刘珍,安康,殷波,等.经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术与电切术治疗高危良性前列腺增生症疗效比较[J].中国男科学杂志,2021,35(4):45-48.[7]杨磊,孙红芳.经尿道等离子前列腺解剖性剜除术治疗老年良性前列腺增生的临床观察[J].中国医药导报,2021,18(12):94-97.[8]赵双生,齐文旭,郭海峰,等.经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术与前列腺电切术治疗大体积前列腺增生的近期疗效对照研究[J].中国药物与临床,2020,20(21):3608-3610.[9]张君,任承德,陈国俊,等.经尿道前列腺等离子剜除术对大体积前列腺增生患者尿动力学、性功能及生活质量的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2020,20(21):4172-4176. [10]斯钦布和,易发现,王国强,等.经尿道前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生疗效观察[J].局解手术学杂志,2019,28(11):891-895.[11]李鑫,王传麟,谭劲偲,等.不同手术方式治疗前列腺增生症对患者性功能的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2020,17(17):2464-2467.[12]黄静波,邱建新,简伟明,等.四种经尿道前列腺剜除术的疗效和安全性比较[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2020,25(5):405-408.[13]赵虎,孙士成,王必亮,等.经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术与经尿道前列腺等离子电切术治疗良性前列腺增生症疗效比较[J].中国临床医生杂志,2020,48(2):202-205.[14]徐文芳,曾小明,余明主,等.两种手术方案对>60 mL的良性前列腺增生患者尿流动力学及性功能的影响 [J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2019,8(6):399-403.[15]李祝勇,黄健,邓宏伟,等.经尿道前列腺电切剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生对术后性功能障碍率及机体应激反应的影响[J].中国性科学,2020,29(10):19-22.[16]张伟,陈其超,冯欢,等.经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生症的临床疗效比较[J].东南国防医药,2019,21(6):649-651.[17]屈昭义,毛敏.两种术式治疗大体积BPH患者效果及安全性对比[J].中国男科学杂志,2019,33(5):32-35.[18]梁英学,黄勇平,蒙松,等.经尿道前列腺剜除电切术治疗大体积前列腺增生患者的临床疗效和安全性观察[J].贵州医药,2018,42(4):426-428.[19]吴迅.不同手术方式治疗高龄前列腺增生的疗效及对术后前列腺功能的影响[J].临床外科杂志,2019,27(2):173-175.[20]王锋.经尿道前列腺电切术与经尿道前列腺剜除术治疗大体积前列腺增生的安全性及有效性分析[J].实用医院临床杂志,2018,15(4):199-201.[21]何斌,倪浩东,唐庆生,等.经尿道前列腺等离子剜除术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗前列腺增生临床疗效分析[J].中国现代手术学杂志,2018,22(1):52-55.[22]窦红珍,陈先平,孙伟.经尿道前列腺剜除术在重度前列腺增生患者中的疗效观察及对患者性功能的影响研究[J].中国性科学,2019,28(5):23-27.

相似文献/References:

[1]朱 贺,周国明,韩晨阳.Bioz.com在TURP患者血流动力学变化监测及TURS的早期诊治中的应用[J].医学信息,2019,32(03):74.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.03.023]
 ZHU He,ZHOU Guo-ming,HAN Chen-yang.Application of Bioz.com in Hemodynamic Monitoring of TURP Patients and Early Diagnosis and Treatment of TURS[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(21):74.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.03.023]
[2]刘和平.预判性加温干预在老年TURP患者麻醉苏醒期的 应用及效果探析[J].医学信息,2019,32(13):181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.13.060]
 LIU He-ping.Application and Effect of Predictive Warming Intervention in Anesthesia Recovery Period in Elderly Patients undergoing TURP[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(21):181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.13.060]
[3]陈小毛.经尿道前列腺电切术对前列腺增生症所致尿路梗阻的治疗效果及安全性分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(19):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.19.030]
 CHEN Xiao-mao.Therapeutic Effect and Safety of Transurethral Resection of Prostate on Urinary Tract Obstruction Caused by Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(21):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.19.030]
[4]陈仕杰,赵振华,赵国平.双极等离子改良电切术治疗前列腺中叶增生的效果[J].医学信息,2020,33(23):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.23.029]
 CHEN Shi-jie,ZHAO Zhen-hua,ZHAO Guo-ping.Effect of Bipolar Plasma Modified Electrotomy on the Middle Lobe Hyperplasia of Prostate[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(21):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.23.029]
[5]罗杰鑫,卢远生,方少伟,等.良性前列腺增生电切术后再行钬激光剜除术的临床效果[J].医学信息,2020,33(24):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.24.027]
 LUO Jie-xin,LU Yuan-sheng,FANG Shao-wei,et al.Clinical Effect of Holmium Laser Enucleation After Electroresection of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(21):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.24.027]
[6]童禹浩,李军文,叶子翔,等.经尿道前列腺电切术后尿道感染影响因素的Meta分析[J].医学信息,2021,34(11):69.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.11.021]
 TONG Yu-hao,LI Jun-wen,YE Zi-xiang,et al.Meta Analysis of Influencing Factors of Urinary Tract Infection After Transurethral Resection of the Prostate[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(21):69.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.11.021]
[7]熊 敏,张庆梅,汪家鹏.静脉输注硫酸镁对经尿道前列腺电切术患者术后膀胱痉挛和早期恢复质量的影响[J].医学信息,2024,37(03):99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.03.019]
 XIONG Min,ZHANG Qing-mei,WANG Jia-peng.Effect of Intravenous Infusion of Magnesium Sulfate on Postoperative Bladder Spasm and Early Recovery Quality in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Prostate[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(21):99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.03.019]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01