[1]胡晓丹,蒙 云,吕思娆,等.视频眼震电图扫视检查对帕金森病轻度认知障碍患者的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2025,38(03):85-90.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.03.016]
 HU Xiaodan,MENG Yun,LYU Sirao,et al.Diagnostic Value of Video Nystagmography in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson′s Disease[J].Journal of Medical Information,2025,38(03):85-90.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.03.016]
点击复制

视频眼震电图扫视检查对帕金森病轻度认知障碍患者的诊断价值()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2025年03期
页码:
85-90
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2025-02-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Diagnostic Value of Video Nystagmography in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson′s Disease
文章编号:
1006-1959(2025)03-0085-06
作者:
胡晓丹蒙 云吕思娆宁 茜
玉林市红十字会医院神经内科,广西 玉林 537000
Author(s):
HU Xiaodan MENG Yun LYU Sirao NING Qian
Department of Neurology, Yulin Red Cross Hospital, Yulin 537000, Jiangxi, China
关键词:
视频眼震电图扫视检查帕金森病轻度认知障碍
Keywords:
Video electronystagmogram Saccade inspection Parkinson′s disease Mild cognitive impairment
分类号:
R742.5
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.03.016
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析视频眼震电图扫视检查诊断帕金森病轻度认知障碍的价值。方法 选取我院2021年2月-2023年12月收治的帕金森病患者60例,按照患者是否存在轻度认知障碍将其分成认知障碍组(n=30)与无认知障碍组(n=30),另外选取同期在我院接受体检的30例健康体检者,将其设为对照组;全部研究对象均接受视频眼震电图扫视检查,对检查结果进行分析比较,如扫视潜伏期、速度以及准确度。所有受试者均进行帕金森病认知功能评定量表(PD-CRS)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评估,记录各项评分结果。多因素Logistic回归分析帕金森病轻度认知障碍的相关影响因素,并通过ROC分析对各指标单独诊断及联合诊断帕金森病轻度认知障碍的效能进行分析。结果 认知障碍组、无认知障碍组扫视潜伏期均长于对照组(P<0.05),且认知障碍组扫视潜伏期长于无认知障碍组(P<0.05);认知障碍组、无认知障碍组扫视速度均低于对照组(P<0.05),且认知障碍组扫视速度低于无认知障碍组(P<0.05);认知障碍组、无认知障碍组的扫视准确度低于对照组(P<0.05),且认知障碍组扫视准确度低于无认知障碍组(P<0.05);认知障碍组、无认知障碍组MoCA、PD-CRS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05),且认知障碍组MoCA、PD-CRS评分均低于无认知障碍组(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,扫视潜伏期延长、扫视速度缩短、扫视准确度下降与帕金森病轻度认知障碍的发生密切相关(P<0.05)。各指标联合预测帕金森病轻度认知障碍的AUC最大,联合AUC与扫视潜伏、扫视速度、扫视准确度、MoCA评分、PD-CRS评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 帕金森病轻度认知障碍患者存在明显的眼球扫视运动障碍,视频眼震电图扫视检查不仅具有较高的可操作性,而且简单无创,通过视频眼震电图扫视检查联合PD-CRS、MoCA量表的联合诊断模型能对帕金森病轻度认知障碍进行早期准确诊断,进而为早期干预方案的制定提供指导,具有临床价值。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the value of video nystagmography in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson′s disease. Methods A total of 60 patients with Parkinson′s disease admitted to our hospital from February 2021 to December 2023 were selected. According to whether the patients had mild cognitive impairment, they were divided into cognitive impairment group (n=30) and non-cognitive impairment group (n=30). In addition, 30 healthy subjects who underwent physical examination in our hospital during the same period were selected as the control group. All subjects were examined by video nystagmography, and the results were analyzed and compared, such as saccade latency, speed and accuracy. All subjects were assessed with Parkinson′s disease cognitive function rating scale (PD-CRS) and Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA), and the scores were recorded. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the related influencing factors of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson ′s disease, and ROC analysis was used to analyze the efficacy of individual diagnosis and combined diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Results The saccade latency of the cognitive impairment group and the non-cognitive impairment group was longer than that of the control group (P<0.05), and the saccade latency of the cognitive impairment group was longer than that of the non-cognitive impairment group (P<0.05). The saccade speed of the cognitive impairment group and the non-cognitive impairment group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05),and the saccade speed of the cognitive impairment group was lower than that of the non-cognitive impairment group (P<0.05). The saccade accuracy of the cognitive impairment group and the non-cognitive impairment group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05), and the saccade accuracy of the cognitive impairment group was lower than that of the non-cognitive impairment group (P<0.05). The MoCA and PD-CRS scores of the cognitive impairment group and the non-cognitive impairment group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05), and the MoCA and PD-CRS scores of the cognitive impairment group were lower than those of the non-cognitive impairment group (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that prolonged saccade latency, shortened saccade speed and decreased saccade accuracy were closely related to the occurrence of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson′s disease (P<0.05). The AUC of each index combined to predict mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson′s disease was the largest, and the combined AUC was compared with saccade latency, saccade speed, saccade accuracy, MoCA score and PD-CRS score, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Patients with mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson′s disease have obvious eye saccade movement disorders. Video nystagmography saccade examination not only has high operability, but also is simple and non-invasive. The combined diagnostic model of video nystagmography saccade examination combined with PD-CRS and MoCA scales can accurately diagnose mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson′s disease early, and then provide guidance for the formulation of early intervention programs, which has clinical value.

参考文献/References:

[1]谭璐璐,何乾超,陈兴华,等.小醒脑针刺法联合度洛西汀对持续性姿势-知觉性头晕患者心理状态、平衡功能及睡眠质量的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2021,21(12):2314-2317.[2]张晓艺,徐志强,李晓昶,等.帕金森病合并快速眼球运动睡眠行为障碍患者眼球扫视运动、步态适应性与自主神经功能的关系分析[J].中国临床医生杂志,2023,51(2):183-186.[3]赵宗波,石志革,刘晖.伴有快速眼球运动睡眠行为障碍的帕金森病的临床特点[J].中国老年学杂志,2022,42(1):80-82.[4]牛露露,唐鹏,吉林祝,等.帕金森病患者眼球运动异常的临床研究[J].脑与神经疾病杂志,2022,30(5):313-316.[5]武冬冬,苏闻,李淑华,等.门诊帕金森病患者快速眼球运动睡眠期行为障碍在不同运动亚型间的比较[J].中华神经科杂志,2016,49(9):687-691.[6]孙卓,钟文,周银平,等.眼球运动联合平衡功能测试对帕金森病和进行性核上性麻痹的鉴别诊断价值[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2019,19(1):21-24.[7]李淑华,苏闻,金莹,等.帕金森病与多系统萎缩-帕金森症型快速眼球运动睡眠行为障碍的比较研究[J].中风与神经疾病杂志,2021,38(9):777-780.[8]罗丹,吴继祥,覃国勇,等.帕金森病患者血清miR-124水平与认知损害、炎症及氧化应激反应的相关性[J].国际检验医学杂志,2022,43(18):2249-2254.[9]武冬冬,何婧,李凯,等.身体优先型和脑优先型早期帕金森病患者非运动症状的临床比较研究[J].中华神经科杂志,2023,56(10):1103-1111.[10]杨旭,杨培红.基于红外眼动系统探讨帕金森病多模式视觉探索障碍的发生机制[J].解放军医学杂志,2022,47(4):382-389.[11]崔晓芳,路筱,余红梅,等.年轻老年帕金森病病人认知障碍的影响因素及其预测模型构建[J].护理研究,2024,38(2):267-272.[12]任雅芳,王春慧,禹萌,等.帕金森病患者认知障碍的血管性影响因素[J].河南医学研究,2023,32(17):3110-3113.[13]董珍,洪音,韦艳秋,等.帕金森病轻度认知障碍的相关因素分析及对生活质量的影响[J].实用老年医学,2021,35(4):350-353.[14]丁思雨,赵鹏.帕金森病患者认知障碍影响因素研究[J].阿尔茨海默病及相关病杂志,2021,4(3):206-210.[15]朱睿明,张玉虎,唐红梅,等.记忆损害型帕金森病轻度认知障碍患者脑白质疏松及脑血管危险因素的分析[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2015,17(6):606-609.[16]刘向,赵媛,高雅,等.帕金森病患者认知障碍与神经内分泌的相关性研究[J].脑与神经疾病杂志,2023,31(8):494-498.[17]杨一帆,高峰,柳华,等.老年帕金森病病人外周血ApoA1/HDL、血尿酸水平与认知功能的关系[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2023,21(13):2474-2478.[18]徐玲佳,赖春梅.帕金森病患者脑小血管病负荷与临床症状的相关性分析[J].浙江临床医学,2022,24(11):1674-1676.[19]李敏,黎玉环,罗洁,等.帕金森病患者血清ESM-1、ET-1表达与认知功能的关系[J].疑难病杂志,2022,21(11):1124-1128.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01