[1]文羽翔,欧阳文晖.经皮加压钢板与防旋股骨近端髓内钉固定治疗股骨近端骨折的临床疗效[J].医学信息,2025,38(03):118-121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.03.022]
　WEN Yuxiang,OUYANG Wenhui.Clinical Efficacy of Percutaneous Compression Plate and Anti-rotation Proximal Femoral Intramedullary Nail Fixation in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures[J].Journal of Medical Information,2025,38(03):118-121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.03.022]
点击复制

经皮加压钢板与防旋股骨近端髓内钉固定治疗股骨近端骨折的临床疗效()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2025年03期
页码:
118-121
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2025-02-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Efficacy of Percutaneous Compression Plate and Anti-rotation Proximal Femoral Intramedullary Nail Fixation in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures
文章编号:
1006-1959（2025）03-0118-04
作者:
文羽翔1; 欧阳文晖2
会昌县人民医院骨科1，中医科2，江西 会昌 342699
Author(s):
WEN Yuxiang1;  OUYANG Wenhui2
Department of Orthopedics1, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine2, Huichang County People′s Hospital, Huichang 342699, Jiangxi, China
关键词:
经皮加压钢板; 防旋股骨近端髓内钉固定; 股骨近端骨折
Keywords:
Percutaneous pressure plate;  Anti-rotation proximal femoral intramedullary nail fixation;  Proximal femoral fracture
分类号:
R687.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.03.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察经皮加压钢板与防旋股骨近端髓内钉固定治疗股骨近端骨折的临床疗效。方法 选取2021年11月-2023年10月会昌县人民医院收治的60例股骨近端骨折患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组（n=30）和研究组（n=30）。对照组采用经皮加压钢板治疗，研究组采用防旋股骨近端髓内钉固定治疗，比较两组治疗效果、临床手术指标、髋关节功能、并发症发生率。结果 研究组治疗总有效率（96.67%）优于对照组（73.33%）（P＜0.05）；与对照组比较，研究组手术时间、术中出血量、负重行走时间、骨折愈合时间、卧床时间、住院时间均较短（P＜0.05）；与对照组比较，研究组治疗后功能、活动度、畸形、疼痛、总评分等髋关节功能评分均较高（P＜0.05）；研究组并发症发生率（3.33%）低于对照组（33.33%）（P＜0.05）。结论 防旋股骨近端髓内钉固定治疗股骨近端骨折的临床疗效确切，能够有效改善患者髋关节功能，减轻患者手术创伤，提高患者术后康复效果，且安全性较高，值得临床应用。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of percutaneous compression plate and anti-rotation proximal femoral intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. Methods A total of 60 patients with proximal femoral fractures admitted to Huichang County People′s Hospital from November 2021 to October 2023 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and study group by random number table method, with 30 patients in each group. The control group was treated with percutaneous compression plate, and the study group was treated with anti-rotation proximal femoral intramedullary nail fixation. The therapeutic effect, clinical surgical indicators, hip function and complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of treatment in the study group (96.67%) was better than that in the control group (73.33%) (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, weight-bearing walking time, fracture healing time, bed rest time and hospitalization time of the study group were shorter (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the scores of hip joint function such as function, activity, deformity, pain and total score after treatment in the study group were higher (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the study group (3.33%) was lower than that in the control group (33.33%) (P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical efficacy of anti-rotation proximal femoral intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures is definite, which can effectively improve the hip function of patients, reduce the surgical trauma of patients, improve the postoperative rehabilitation effect of patients, and has high safety. It is worthy of clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1]郭天庆,薛飞,冯卫.股骨转子间骨折不同外侧壁分型的内固定治疗策略[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,24(6):917-923.[2]麦胡强.3种内固定治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2022,25(2):247-250.[3]徐锴,李开南.三种内固定固定股骨转子间六部分骨折各分型稳定性的有限元分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(4):345-352.[4]徐锴,李开南. PFNA与PCCP固定法治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的有限元分析[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2019,8(7):498-503.[5]白浪,侯毅龙,张晟,等.三种内固定方式治疗内侧壁缺损的不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(5):412-418.[6]游红林,王显林,刘知泉.老年不稳定性股骨转子间骨折不同内固定方式比较[J].现代仪器与医疗,2018,24(3):72-74.[7]胡春祥,黄建国,黄永红,等.八珍汤联合股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定对老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者髋关节功能及骨代谢的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2023,43(2):310-313.[8]薛超,刘晖,丁真奇,等.桥接组合式内固定系统治疗股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨近端、股骨远端骨折[J].骨科,2021,12(2):149-154.[9]马超,宋矿朋,刘向林.经皮骨钩股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效及安全性[J].局解手术学杂志,2023,32(7):625-628.[10]马超,宋矿朋,刘向林.血清C1q/肿瘤坏死因子相关蛋白3预测绝经后女性股骨粗隆间骨折防旋股骨近端髓内钉内固定术后周围再骨折的价值[J].中国临床医生杂志,2023,51(10):1209-1212.[11]姚积龙,汤艳,叶锡勇,等.滑动加压技术在老年股骨转子间骨折股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗中的应用[J].中国老年学杂志,2023,43(21):5216-5219.[12]卢慧,王彩琳,卜赞,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉与双极人工股骨头置换治疗股骨近端骨折的临床疗效分析[J].徐州医科大学学报,2021,41(10):764-766.[13]李泽伟,樊俊俊,郝治龙,等.人工股骨头置换术与股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定术治疗高龄患者不稳定股骨转子间骨折临床对比观察[J].山东医药,2023,63(15):76-79.[14]同高峰,宋雷,雷金元,等.股骨近端锁定钢板、PFNA治疗稳定型股骨转子间骨折临床对比研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,48(6):748-750,754.[15]张扬宁,陈文杰,陈海南.动力髋螺钉与股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨近端骨折的疗效比较[J].山西医药杂志,2020,49(4):436-438.[16]蔡腾,彭强,王冰一,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定手术治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的效果及对髋关节功能的影响[J].中华实验外科杂志,2022,39(10):2018-2021.[17]凌峰,张伟,常锐,等.股骨近端仿生髓内钉与股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定治疗股骨转子间骨折的近期疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2023,25(6):544-548.[18]孟庆奇,崔树廷,梁伟国,等.DHS、PFNA、半髋关节置换术治疗老年不稳定性股骨转子间骨折的疗效对比[J].实用医学杂志,2019,35(7):1036-1039,1043.[19]张雨,李钧,李志民,等.解剖型髓内钉内固定和股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的比较研究[J].中医正骨,2022,34(3):15-19.[20]孙群周,阮成群,陈武林,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定与股骨近端锁定钢板内固定治疗A2.3型股骨转子间骨折合并大转子外侧壁冠状面破损的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2021,33(4):9-14.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01