[1]张旭坤,王胜利,葛站勇.前外侧入路下不同髋关节置换方式治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].医学信息,2020,33(22):120-122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.22.034]
　ZHANG Xu-kun,WANG Sheng-li,GE Zhan-yong.Comparison of Curative Effect Different Hip Replacement Methods in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly Through Anterolateral Approach[J].Medical Information,2020,33(22):120-122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.22.034]
点击复制

前外侧入路下不同髋关节置换方式治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年22期
页码:
120-122
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Curative Effect Different Hip Replacement Methods in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly Through Anterolateral Approach
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）22-0120-03
作者:
张旭坤; 王胜利; 葛站勇
（天津市津南医院骨科，天津 300350）
Author(s):
ZHANG Xu-kun; WANG Sheng-li; GE Zhan-yong
(Department of Orthopaedics,Tianjin Jinnan Hospital,Tianjin 300350,China)
关键词:
前外侧入路; 半髋关节置换; 全髋关节置换; 股骨颈骨折
Keywords:
Anterolateral approach; Hemi hip replacement; Total hip replacement; Femoral neck fracture
分类号:
R683
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.22.034
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究前外侧入路下不同髋关节置换方式治疗老年股骨颈骨折的临床效果。方法 选取2018年1月~2019年12月我院收治的老年股骨颈骨折患者100例，根据前外侧入路下髋关节置换方式不同分为研究组与对照组，各50例。对照组予前外侧入路下半髋关节置换方式，研究组予前外侧入路下全髋关节置换方式，比较比较两组临床指标（手术时间、住院时间、出血量、切口长度）、骨代谢指标[骨特异性碱性磷酸酶（BAP）、骨该素（BGP）、Ⅰ型胶原羧基端肽（β-CTX）]、炎症因子指标[肿瘤坏死因子α（TNF-α）、白介素-1（IL-1）]。结果 研究组手术时间、住院时间、出血量优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；研究组BAP、BGP水平高于对照组[（42.01±5.31）ng/ml vs（33.14±4.69）ng/ml]、[（9.59±1.21）ng/ml vs（8.75±0.92）ng/ml]，β-CTX水平低于对照组[（201.89±38.32）pg/ml vs（310.77±40.06）pg/ml]，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；研究组TNF-α、IL-１水平低于对照组[（12.56±2.01）pg/ml vs（18.56±2.34）pg/ml]、[（3.01±0.29）pg/ml vs（4.21±0.54）pg/ml]，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 在老年股骨颈骨折中采用前外侧入路下全髋关节置换方式虽手术时间较长，但治疗效果更佳，能有效促进骨代谢与再生，改善炎症，有利于患者恢复。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the clinical effect of different hip replacement methods under anterolateral approach in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly.Methods from January 2018 to December 2019, 100 elderly patients with femoral neck fracture were selected and divided into study group and control group according to the different ways of hip replacement under anterolateral approach, 50 cases in each group.The control group received anterolateral approach for lower hemi hip replacement, and the study group received anterolateral approach for total hip replacement. The clinical indicators (operating time, hospital stay, blood loss, incision length) and bone metabolism were compared between the two groups. Indexes [Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), Bone (BGP), Type I collagen carboxy-terminal peptide (β-CTX)], inflammatory factor indexes [Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin-1 (IL-1)].Results The operation time, hospitalization time, blood loss of the study group were better than those of the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); the BAP and BGP levels of the study group were higher than those of the control group [(42.01±5.31)ng/ml vs (33.14±4.69) ng/ml], [(9.59±1.21) ng/ml vs (8.75±0.92) ng/ml], the level of β-CTX was lower than that of the control group [(201.89±38.32) pg/ml vs ( 310.77±40.06)pg/ml], the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); the levels of TNF-α and IL-1 in the study group were lower than those in the control group [(12.56±2.01)pg/ml vs (18.56±2.34)pg /ml], [(3.01±0.29) pg/ml vs (4.21±0.54) pg/ml], the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion The total hip replacement with anterolateral approach in the elderly patients with femoral neck fracture has a long operation time, but the treatment effect is better. It can effectively promote bone metabolism and regeneration, improve inflammation, and help patients recover.

参考文献/References:

[1]陶永亮,王冠贤,黄永湘,等.两种不同手术入路治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效的差异性研究[J].中国临床研究,2016(9):1224-1226.[2]刘伟,严志强,肖艳,等.前外侧入路MIPO技术治疗老年肱骨近端OTAⅡB型骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2016,19(4):493-495.[3]邢晓伟,郭祥,涂源源.三切口联合入路与膝关节镜辅助下前外侧入路治疗累及后外侧胫骨平台骨折的疗效对比研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2019(18):89-91.[4]阙玉康,胡勇,丁辉,等.保留关节囊的前外侧肌间隙入路微创全髋临床疗效分析[J].安徽医药,2015,19(9):1709-1713.[5]赵维彪,何子微,李季,等.3D打印导板在以SuperPATH技术行老年髋关节置换中的应用价值:回顾性研究和文献检索证据分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,22(9):1324-1330.[6]李涧,常留辉,顾颀,等.老年髋部骨折48小时内手术的疗效分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2019,39(17):1037-1043.[7]张涵,员晋,兰海.Super PATH微创髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(5):400-406.[8]张睿,柯陈荣,胡炜,等.直接前入路与外侧入路全髋关节置换术的临床对比研究[J].成都医学院学报,2016,11(5):602-604.[9]邓波,王静成,熊传芝,等.初次全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的近期疗效及影响因素分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2016,18(11):994-997.[10]赵文博,刘雷.老年股骨颈骨折治疗方式的临床应用进展[J].华西医学,2015,12(2):385-388.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01