[1]杨宜先.CT与传统X线诊断慢阻肺合并肺间质纤维化的效果比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(10):173-175.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.10.051]
　YANG Yi-xian.Comparison of the Effect of CT and Traditional X-ray in the Diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary with Pulmonary Interstitial Fibrosis[J].Medical Information,2021,34(10):173-175.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.10.051]
点击复制

CT与传统X线诊断慢阻肺合并肺间质纤维化的效果比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年10期
页码:
173-175
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2021-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the Effect of CT and Traditional X-ray in the Diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary with Pulmonary Interstitial Fibrosis
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）10-0173-03
作者:
杨宜先
（东莞市水乡中心医院影像科，广东 东莞 523142）
Author(s):
YANG Yi-xian
(Department of Imaging,Dongguan Shuixiang Central Hospital,Dongguan 523142,Guangdong,China)
关键词:
慢阻肺; 肺间质纤维化; CT; X线
Keywords:
COPD; Pulmonary interstitial fibrosis; CT; X-ray
分类号:
R816.41
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.10.051
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较CT与传统X线诊断慢阻肺合并肺间质纤维化的效果。方法 选取2019年8月~2020年8月我院接诊的92例疑似慢阻肺合并肺间质纤维化患者为研究对象，均进行CT、传统X线检查，与病理检查为标准，比较两种检测方法诊断效果、准确率、敏感度、特异度、不同程度肺气肿诊断率以及征象显示率。结果 经一致性检测显示CT诊断Kappa值为0.954，传统X线检查Kappa值为0.798，提示一致性良好；CT诊断慢阻肺合并肺间质纤维化准确率、敏感度、特异度均高于传统X线，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；CT诊断轻度肺气肿准确率高于传统X线诊断，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），中度、重度诊断准确率与传统X线诊断比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。CT检查征象（肺纹理紊乱和增强、边缘致密影、肺大疱、小叶间隔增厚、支气管扩张）显示率均高于传统X线检查，毛玻璃样高密度影显示率低于传统X线检查比较，但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 CT诊断慢阻肺合并肺间质纤维化准确率、敏感度以及特异度均高于传统X线检查，可提高轻度肺气肿诊断准确率，且各检查征象显示率更优，可为临床早期慢阻肺合并肺纤维化提供可靠的诊断和治疗依据。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effects of CT and traditional X-ray diagnosis of COPD with pulmonary interstitial fibrosis.Methods A total of 92 patients with suspected COPD complicated with pulmonary interstitial fibrosis who were admitted to our hospital from August 2019 to August 2020 were selected as the research subjects. CT, traditional X-ray examinations and pathological examinations were performed as standard.The diagnostic effect, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, diagnosis rate of different degrees of emphysema, and the rate of sign display were compared between the two detection methods.Results The consistency test showed that the Kappa value of CT diagnosis was 0.954, indicating good consistency; the Kappa value of traditional X-ray examination was 0.798, indicating good consistency;The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of CT in the diagnosis of COPD complicated with pulmonary fibrosis were higher than those of traditional X-ray,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);The accuracy of CT diagnosis of mild emphysema was higher than that of traditional X-ray diagnosis,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Compared with traditional X-ray diagnosis, the accuracy of moderate and severe diagnosis was not statistically different (P>0.05).CT examination signs (pulmonary texture disorder and enhancement, edge compact shadow, pulmonary bullae, interlobular thickening, bronchiectasis) were higher than traditional X-ray examinations, and ground-glass-like high-density shadows showed lower rates than traditional X-ray examinations,but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of CT in the diagnosis of COPD with pulmonary fibrosis are higher than traditional X-ray examinations, which can improve the diagnostic accuracy of mild emphysema, and the display rate of each examination sign is better, which can be COPD combined with pulmonary fibrosis in the early clinical stage provides a reliable basis for diagnosis and treatment.

参考文献/References:

1]黄迪开,谭莉平,陆建常.高分辨CT在特发性肺间质纤维化中的诊断价值[J].广西医学,2012,34(7):866-867,870.[2]孙登峰.X线胸片与常规CT、HRCT对矽肺及其合并症诊断的对比分析[J].影像技术,2014,26(4):33-35.[3]张晓辰,耿鹤群,纪蒙蒙,等.多层螺旋CT对慢阻肺及哮喘-慢阻肺重叠综合征的定量研究[J].中国数字医学,2019,14(1):53-56.[4]廖艺璇,陈亚红,白宇,等.慢性阻塞性肺疾病CT肺血管定量指标的临床意义[J].中国呼吸与危重监护杂志,2015,14(6):529-533.[5]杨飞,纪蒙蒙,朱晓龙,等.右肺上叶尖段及其亚段支气管CT定量参数对慢性阻塞性肺疾病病情的评估价值[J].山东医药,2018,58(12):14-17.[6]张攀,于化鹏,樊慧珍,等.高分辨率CT肺气肿定量与慢性阻塞性肺疾病严重程度的相关性[J].实用医学杂志,2016,32(13):2187-2190.[7]肖斌.肺泡灌洗术与纤支镜在慢阻肺合并肺不张中的诊断与治疗分析[J].影像研究与医学应用,2020,4(18):218-219.[8]Cho YH,Seo JB,Kim N,et al.Comparison of a New Integral-Based Half-Band Method for CT Measurement of Peripheral Airways in COPD Witha Conventional Full-Width Half-Maximum Method Using Both Phantom and Clinical CT Images[J].J Comput Assist Tomogr,2015,39(3):428-436.[9]白宇,王晓华,林帆,等.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者综合评估分组与CT扫描评价的研究[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2015,38(5):356-360.[10]杨飞,纪蒙蒙,朱晓龙,等.右肺上叶尖段及其亚段支气管CT定量参数对慢性阻塞性肺疾病病情的评估价值[J].山东医药,2018,58(12):14-17.[11]李考,王萍,闫如意,等.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者椎骨的CT值与骨密度的关系[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2018,41(5):340-344.[12]肖虎榜.多层螺旋CT在慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断中的应用[J].中国当代医药,2020,27(27):141-143,146.[13]仇煜,钱晓君,张雪,等.肺纤维化合并肺气肿和单纯慢阻肺-肺气肿临床特点比较[J].临床肺科杂志，2018，23(9) :1634-1637.[14]王述红,黄小波,刘翱,等.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者急性加重频率与高分辨率CT参数的相关性研究[J].中华肺部疾病杂志,2015,8(3):32-35．[15]董连军.慢阻肺合并肺间质纤维化经CT与传统X线诊断的效果[J].中国现代医生,2017,55(18):99-101.

相似文献/References:

[1]黄朝宗.无创呼吸机对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者治疗效果的影响[J].医学信息,2018,31(01):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.01.042]
　HUANG Chao-zong.Effect of Noninvasive Ventilator on the Treatment of Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease[J].Medical Information,2018,31(10):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.01.042]
[2]温 蕾.复方异丙托溴铵常温雾化与加温雾化治疗 慢阻肺的护理效果分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(06):170.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.06.061]
　WEN Lei.Analysis of Nursing Effect of Compound Ipratropium Bromide Nebulization at Room Temperature and Heating Atomization in Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease[J].Medical Information,2018,31(10):170.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.06.061]
[3]王春艳,平玉卓,赵秀芹,等.协同护理干预对慢阻肺患者预后及自我护理能力的影响观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(13):181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.13.057]
　WANG Chun-yan,PING Yu-zhuo,ZHAO Xiu-qin,et al.Effect of Cooperative Nursing Intervention on Prognosis and Self-care Ability of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease[J].Medical Information,2018,31(10):181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.13.057]
[4]鲁 婧,杜 君.肺心病左室舒张功能障碍发病机制的研究进展[J].医学信息,2019,32(04):54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.04.019]
　LU Jing,DU Jun.Advances in the Pathogenesis of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Pulmonary Heart Disease[J].Medical Information,2019,32(10):54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.04.019]
[5]周 笳,董丽霞.阿替普酶联合华法林治疗慢阻肺合并肺栓塞的有效性分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(05):146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.05.046]
　ZHOU Jia,DONG Li-xia.Efficacy Analysis of Alteplase Combined with Warfarin in the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Pulmonary Embolism[J].Medical Information,2019,32(10):146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.05.046]
[6]刘伟娜.CD64感染指数、BODE指数与降钙素原在慢阻肺患者中的水平变化[J].医学信息,2019,32(06):125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.06.039]
　LIU Wei-na.Changes of CD64 Infection Index,BODE Index and Procalcitonin Levels in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease[J].Medical Information,2019,32(10):125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.06.039]
[7]钟红燕.盐酸氨溴索治疗慢阻肺合并肺部感染的临床效果[J].医学信息,2019,32(12):154.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.051]
　ZHONG Hong-yan.Clinical Effect of Ambroxol Hydrochloride in the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Pulmonary Infection[J].Medical Information,2019,32(10):154.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.051]
[8]蔡 懿.医教协同专科治疗对慢阻肺患者肺功能和疗效的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(19):110.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.19.023]
　CAI Yi.Effect of Medical Education Combined with Specialized Treatment on Pulmonary Function and Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease[J].Medical Information,2023,36(10):110.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.19.023]
[9]郑 新,张 颖.慢阻肺患者PSQI评分与NLR、PLR、CRP水平及急性加重频率的相关性[J].医学信息,2020,33(12):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.12.031]
　ZHENG Xin,ZHANG Ying.Correlation of PSQI Score with NLR,PLR,CRP Level and Frequency of Acute Exacerbation in COPD Patients[J].Medical Information,2020,33(10):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.12.031]
[10]郑 妍.呼吸功能锻炼及饮食干预模式对慢阻肺患者生活质量的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(20):184.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.20.051]
　ZHENG Yan.Effect of Respiratory Function Exercise and Diet Intervention Model on Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease[J].Medical Information,2022,35(10):184.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.20.051]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01