[1]刘汉建,王明星,刘瑞林,等.经鼻型肠梗阻导管应用于腹部术后早期粘连性肠梗阻胃肠减压的临床研究[J].医学信息,2021,34(21):88-90.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.21.022]
　LIU Han-jian,WANG Ming-xing,LIU Rui-lin,et al.Clinical Study of Nasal Intestinal Obstruction Catheter in Early Postoperative Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction Gastrointestinal Decompression[J].Medical Information,2021,34(21):88-90.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.21.022]
点击复制

经鼻型肠梗阻导管应用于腹部术后早期粘连性肠梗阻胃肠减压的临床研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年21期
页码:
88-90
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-11-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Study of Nasal Intestinal Obstruction Catheter in Early Postoperative Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction Gastrointestinal Decompression
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）21-0088-03
作者:
刘汉建; 王明星; 刘瑞林; 等
（兴国县人民医院普外科，江西 兴国 342400）
Author(s):
LIU Han-jian; WANG Ming-xing; LIU Rui-lin; et al.
(Department of General Surgery,Xingguo People’s Hospital,Xingguo 342400,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
经鼻型肠梗阻导管; 腹部手术; 早期粘连; 肠梗阻; 胃肠减压
Keywords:
Transnasal intestinal obstruction catheter; Abdominal surgery; Early adhesion; Intestinal obstruction; Gastrointestinal decompression
分类号:
R574.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.21.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究经鼻型肠梗阻导管应用于腹部术后早期粘连性肠梗阻胃肠减压的临床疗效。方法 选取2020年5月-2021年8月在我院诊治的60例腹部术后早期粘连性肠梗阻患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各30例。对照组采用传统鼻胃管置入进行胃肠减压进行治疗，观察组采用经鼻型肠梗阻导管进行胃肠减压治疗，比较两组治疗效果、临床指标（液气平面消失时间、24h内腹围缩小量、24h胃肠减压量）、临床症状（腹痛、腹胀）缓解时间、胃肠功能恢指标（肠鸣音恢复时间、进食时间、拔管时间）以及不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组治疗总有效率为93.33%，高于对照组的80.00%（P＜0.05）；治疗后，观察组24h内腹围缩小量、24h胃肠减压量均大于对照组，液气平面消失时间小于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组腹痛、腹胀缓解时间均小于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组肠鸣音恢复时间、进食时间、拔管时间均短于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组不良反应发生率为6.67%，低于对照组的16.67%（P＜0.05）。结论 采用经鼻型肠梗阻导管对腹部术后早期粘连性肠梗阻患者机械能胃肠减压治疗效果确切，总有效率较高，可降低不良反应发生率，缩短临床症状改善时间，促进胃肠减压效果，提高胃肠减压量，进而促进胃肠功能早期恢复，具有重要的临床应用价值。
Abstract:
Objective To study the clinical effect of nasal ileus tube in early postoperative abdominal adhesive intestinal obstruction gastrointestinal decompression.Methods A total of 60 patients with early adhesive intestinal obstruction after abdominal surgery in our hospital from May 2020 to August 2021 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. The control group was treated with traditional nasogastric tube placement for gastrointestinal decompression, and the observation group was treated with nasal intestinal obstruction catheter for gastrointestinal decompression. The therapeutic effect, clinical indexes (disappearance time of liquid gas plane, reduction of abdominal circumference within 24 hours, and gastrointestinal decompression within 24 hours), clinical symptoms (abdominal pain, abdominal distension) remission time, gastrointestinal function recovery indexes ( recovery time of bowel sounds, eating time, extubation time) and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 93.33%, which was higher than 80.00% in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the reduction of abdominal circumference and the amount of gastrointestinal decompression within 24 hours in the observation group were greater than those in the control group, and the disappearance time of liquid-gas plane was less than that in the control group (P<0.05). The relief time of abdominal pain and abdominal distension in the observation group was less than that in the control group (P<0.05). The recovery time of bowel sounds, eating time and extubation time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 6.67%, which was lower than 16.67% in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Conclusion Transnasal intestinal obstruction catheter is effective in the treatment of mechanical gastrointestinal decompression in patients with early adhesive intestinal obstruction after abdominal surgery, and the total effective rate is high. It can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, shorten the improvement time of clinical symptoms, promote the effect of gastrointestinal decompression, improve the amount of gastrointestinal decompression, and promote the early recovery of gastrointestinal function, which has important clinical application value.

参考文献/References:

[1]李晶.经鼻肠梗阻导管治疗肠梗阻的效果观察[J].临床合理用药杂志,2017,10(10):133-134.[2]伊涛.改良肠梗阻导管技术与传统胃肠减压治疗老年粘连性肠梗阻的效果比较[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2018,23(6):50-52.[3]黄龙,于庆生,张琦,等.内镜下经鼻肠梗阻导管选择性X线造影在粘连性肠梗阻中的诊疗价值[J].中华普外科杂志,2018,33(4):302-304.[4]Gupta R,Gupta P.Intestinal obstruction associated with ovarian remnant in postmenopausal female[J].J Midlife Health,2016,7(4):185-188.[5]王梅阑,王雅锌,陈文清,等.肠梗阻导管在老年患者术后早期粘连性肠梗阻中的应用效果[J].中国老年学杂志,2017,37(2):430-431.[6]俞谦.经鼻肠梗阻导管治疗难治性粘连性肠梗阻[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2016,33(8):561-562.[7]卢勇,郭敏慧,毕铁男,等.肠梗阻导管联合早期肠内营养对粘连性肠梗阻的治疗效果观察[J].中华全科医学,2017,15(5):879-882.[8]李二生,穆吉兴,孟庆聚,等.改良肠梗阻导管技术在难治性粘连性肠梗阻的临床应用[J].介入放射学杂志,2018,27(7):645-650.[9]Fujii K,Washida N,Arai E,et al.Adhesive intestinal obstruction increases the risk of intestinal perforation in peritoneal dialysis patients: a case report[J].BMC Nephrol,2018,19(1):153.[10]陈颖,刘玮.经腹置入肠梗阻导管联合肠内营养对粘连性肠梗阻的效果观察[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016,20(2):63-65.[11]侯开庆,彭勃.腹腔镜手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻16例疗效观察[J].海南医学,2016,27(4):637-638.[12]Sisodia V,Sahu SK,Kumar S.Clinical Profile of Patients with Postoperative Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction and its Association with Intraoperative Peritoneal Adhesion Index[J].Chirurgia (Bucur),2016,111(3):251-258.[13]闫永明.不同手术方式治疗粘连性肠梗阻临床疗效对比分析[J].中国药物与临床,2016,16(5):740-741.[14]郑湘,王永锋.胃肠减压导管置入方式不同对治疗效果及其安全性的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2016,13(24):3523-3525.[15]崔新野,景惠荣,赵金,等.经鼻肠梗阻导管联合泛影葡胺治疗腹部术后急性粘连性小肠梗阻的临床分析[J].大连医科大学学报,2017,39(4):365-369.[16]张晓征,桑畅野.经鼻型肠梗阻导管在急性肠梗阻治疗中的应用研究[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2016,23(12):1506-1509.[17]郑湘,王永锋.胃肠减压导管置入方式不同对治疗效果及其安全性的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2016,13(24):3523-3525.[18]苑善收,赵建锋.经鼻插入型肠梗阻导管治疗粘连性小肠梗阻的临床应用[J].医疗装备,2017,36(1):430-433.[19]赵俊立,马伟琳,宋媛媛.X线下经鼻型肠梗阻导管治疗肠梗阻的临床效果[J].中国实用医刊,2016,43(14):115-116.

相似文献/References:

[1]朱红平.阶梯式健康教育对腹部术后留置腹腔引流管患者干预效果及非计划性拔管率的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(13):170.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.13.038]
　ZHU Hong-ping.Effect of Ladder-model Health Education on the Intervention Effect and Unplanned Extubation Rate of Patients with Indwelling Abdominal Drainage Tube After Abdominal Surgery[J].Medical Information,2023,36(21):170.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.13.038]
[2]孙 强,佘丽丽,黄敏红.全麻腹腔镜手术对老年腹部手术患者血流动力学、镇静效果及认知功能的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(23):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.23.011]
　SUN Qiang,SHE Li-li,HUANG Min-hong.Effects of General Anesthesia Laparoscopic Surgery on Hemodynamics,Sedative Effect and Cognitive Function in Elderly Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery[J].Medical Information,2023,36(21):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.23.011]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01