[1]鲁留平.腹腔镜系膜剥离法阑尾切除术与腹腔镜常规阑尾切除术的效果比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(21):103-105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.21.027]
　LU Liu-ping.Comparison of Application Value Between Laparoscopic Mesangial Stripping Appendectomy and Laparoscopic Conventional Appendectomy[J].Medical Information,2021,34(21):103-105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.21.027]
点击复制

腹腔镜系膜剥离法阑尾切除术与腹腔镜常规阑尾切除术的效果比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年21期
页码:
103-105
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-11-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Application Value Between Laparoscopic Mesangial Stripping Appendectomy and Laparoscopic Conventional Appendectomy
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）21-0103-03
作者:
鲁留平
（乐平市人民医院急诊科，江西 乐平 333300）
Author(s):
LU Liu-ping
(Emergency Department,Leping People’s Hospital,Leping 333300,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
腹腔镜; 系膜剥离法; 阑尾切除术; 炎症因子
Keywords:
Laparoscopy; Mesangium stripping method; Appendectomy; Inflammatory factors
分类号:
R656.8
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.21.027
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察腹腔镜系膜剥离法阑尾切除术与腹腔镜常规阑尾切除术的应用价值。方法 选取2020年6月-2021年6月在我院诊治的98例阑尾炎患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各49例。对照组采用腹腔镜常规阑尾切除术，观察组采用腹腔镜系膜剥离法阑尾切除术；比较两组临床手术指标、炎症因子指标、术后疼痛评分、标本从Trocar的取出率及并发症发生率。结果 观察组手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、住院时间均小于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；术后，两组C反应蛋白（CRP）、降钙素原（PCT）、肿瘤坏死因子-α（TNF-α）、白细胞介素-6（IL-6）均高于术前，但观察组低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；术后两组疼痛评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；观察组标本从Trocar 取出率高于对照组，并发症发生率低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 与常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术比较，腹腔镜系膜剥离法阑尾切除术手术时间短，术中出血量少，术后恢复快，可缩短住院时间，且标本从Trocar 取出率高，患者术后炎症因子水平和并发症发生率低，应用效果显著。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the application value of laparoscopic mesangial stripping appendectomy and laparoscopic conventional appendectomy.Methods A total of 98 patients with appendicitis who were treated in our hospital from June 2020 to June 2021 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, 49 cases in each group. The control group was treated with laparoscopic conventional appendectomy, and the observation group was treated with laparoscopic mesangial dissection appendectomy. The clinical operation index, inflammatory factor index, postoperative pain score, specimen removal rate from Trocar and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anal exhaust time, ambulation time and hospitalization time of the observation group were less than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After operation, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the two groups were higher than those before operation, but the observation group was lower than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in pain score between the two groups after operation (P>0.05). The removal rate of specimens from Trocar in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the incidence of complications was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic appendectomyal stripping appendectomy has the advantages of shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, faster postoperative recovery and shorter hospital stay. At the same time, the high removal rate of Trocar, the low level of inflammatory factors and the low incidence of complications, which has significant application advantages and deserve clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘吉平,张国胜,高志伟,等.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中盲肠憩室炎的处理[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(7):665-667.[2]龚建云,汪江,郑云彭,等.改良荷包缝合法在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(5):455-457.[3]郭婧,刘勇峰,袁江涛,等.腹腔镜阑尾切除与开腹阑尾切除术疗效比较[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2018,21(9):721-723.[4]阎景铁,张大森.小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾系膜的处理方法及并发症原因分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2018,23(2):120-122.[5]印山河,陈传国,王黎,等.开腹与腹腔镜阑尾切除对手术情况及人体血清C反应蛋白和降钙素原影响的比较[J].临床外科杂志,2018,26(4):289-291.[6]付召军,杨玉辉,魏健,等.不同侧孔引流管结合引流辅助装置在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的应用[J].中国现代手术学杂志,2017,21(2):99-103.[7]王德仲,康春博,李文强,等.经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾系膜不同处理方法的临床研究[J].医学综述,2017,23(15):3114-3117.[8]唐德国.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与常规阑尾切除术的临床疗效观察[J].中国社区医师,2017,33(27):56-57.[9]张育瑆,赵惠斌,张朝军.腹腔镜系膜剥离法阑尾切除术与腹腔镜常规阑尾切除术的对比研究[J].局解手术学杂志,2018,27(8):550-553.[10]廖衣华,张恒.经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术和常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术切口并发症差异比较[J].现代实用医学,2018,30(10):1287-1288.[11]Fagerstrom A,Paajanen P,Saarelainen H,et al.Non-specific abdominal pain remains as the most common reason for acute abdomen: 26-year retrospective audit in one emergency unit[J].Scand J Gastroenterol,2017,52(10):1072-1077.[12]江雪峰,吴秋美.不同取出标本的方法对腹腔镜阑尾切除术后切口感染的影响[J].吉林医学,2016,37(3):540-541.[13]Pogorelic Z,Katic J,Mrklic I,et al.Lateral thermal damage of mesoappendix and appendiceal base during laparoscopic appendectomy in children: comparison of the harmonic scalpel (Ultracision), bipolar coagulation (LigaSure), and thermal fusion technology (MiSeal) [J].J Surg Res,2017(212):101-107.[14]冯健,崔乃强.老年急性阑尾炎患者单孔腹腔镜和腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的对比研究[J].中华老年医学杂志,2019,38(11):1266-1269．[15]李晓欢,周鸿鲲,梅小平,等.腹腔镜下阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的疗效及对围术期氧化应激和炎症反应的影响[J].中国普通外科杂志,2018,27(3):382-386.[16]薛孟海.比较阑尾炎患者腹腔镜系膜剥离法阑尾切除术,腹腔镜常规阑尾切除术的临床疗效[J].临床研究,2019,27(10):136-138.[17]贺诗铭,杨勇,刘维政,等.腹腔镜阑尾切除术对阑尾炎患者的疗效及对血清 hs-CRP的影响[J].河北医学,2019,25(9):1552-1556．[18]张昕,李毅,柏立山,等.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾根部及系膜不同处理方式的比较[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2019,44(4):481-483．[19]崔凯,周子鹏.老年阑尾炎患者腹腔镜阑尾切除术对营养状态炎症反应的影响及临床效果分析[J].河北医学,2020,26(3):473-478．

相似文献/References:

[1]王 丹.腹腔镜子宫全切除术与开腹手术的临床效果分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(03):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.034]
　WANG Dan.Analysis of Clinical Effects between Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Open Hysterectomy[J].Medical Information,2018,31(21):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.034]
[2]李华桥.腹腔镜联合胃镜行胃间质瘤切除术对胃间质瘤患者 术后康复及并发症的影响分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.039]
　LI Hua-qiao.Effect of Laparoscopy Combined with Gastroscopy for Gastric Stromal Tumor Resection on Postoperative Rehabilitation and Complications of Gastric Stromal Tumor Patients[J].Medical Information,2018,31(21):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.039]
[3]李建勇.腹腔镜下手术治疗卵巢巧克力囊肿研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(12):57.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.018]
　LI Jian-yong.Laparoscopic Surgery for Ovarian Chocolate Cysts[J].Medical Information,2018,31(21):57.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.018]
[4]夏易曼娜,李虎成.腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术与传统开腹手术的对比研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(12):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.036]
　XIA Yi-manna,LI Hu-cheng.Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Cervical Cancer and Traditional Open Surgery[J].Medical Information,2018,31(21):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.036]
[5]刘秀娟,刘 辉.子宫内膜异位症相关性不孕的诊断及治疗研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(14):35.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.012]
　LIU Xiu-juan,LIU Hui.Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometriosis Related Infertility[J].Medical Information,2018,31(21):35.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.012]
[6]闫 军,寇旭东,马 博,等.Hem-o-lok结扎锁和Endoloop套扎在 腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(18):83.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.025]
　YAN Jun,KOU Xu-dong,MA Bo,et al.Clinical Study of Hem-o-lok Ligation Lock and Endoloop Ligation in Laparoscopic Appendectomy[J].Medical Information,2018,31(21):83.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.025]
[7]姚文超,彭继红.腹腔镜下电凝阻断子宫动脉在无生育要求患者子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用及预后[J].医学信息,2018,31(21):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.21.028]
　YAO Wen-chao,PENG Ji-hong.Application and Prognosis of Laparoscopic Electrocoagulation for Uterine Artery Removal in Patients with Uterine Fibroids without Fertility Requirements[J].Medical Information,2018,31(21):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.21.028]
[8]林跃韩,许庆文.腹腔镜uncut Roux-en-Y吻合与传统吻合方式的研究进展[J].医学信息,2018,31(22):31.[doi:10.3969/j.Ⅰssn.1006-1959.2018.22.010]
　LIN Yue-han,XU Qing-wen.Research Progress of Laparoscopic uncut Roux-en-Y Anastomosis and Traditional Anastomosis[J].Medical Information,2018,31(21):31.[doi:10.3969/j.Ⅰssn.1006-1959.2018.22.010]
[9]董俊清,黄菊红.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗良性卵巢囊肿的临床效果对比[J].医学信息,2018,31(24):93.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.025]
　DONG Jun-qing,HUANG Ju-hong.Comparison of Clinical Effects between Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Benign Ovarian Cysts[J].Medical Information,2018,31(21):93.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.025]
[10]梁 鑫,张学军.左肝蒂阻断行腹腔镜左半肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石疗效研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(01):95.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.01.029]
　LIANG Xin,ZHANG Xue-jun.Therapeutic Effect of Left Hepatic Pedicle Blockade on Laparoscopic Left Hepatectomy for Intrahepatic Bile Duct Stones[J].Medical Information,2019,32(21):95.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.01.029]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01