[1]许春雨,蔡爱露.超声连续追踪对凶险型前置胎盘伴胎盘植入的早期诊断价值[J].医学信息,2022,35(05):178-180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.05.048]
　XU Chun-yu,CAI Ai-lu.The Value of Ultrasound Continuous Tracking in the Early Diagnosis of Dangerous Placenta Previa with Placenta Implantation[J].Medical Information,2022,35(05):178-180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.05.048]
点击复制

超声连续追踪对凶险型前置胎盘伴胎盘植入的早期诊断价值()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年05期
页码:
178-180
栏目:
诊疗技术
出版日期:
2022-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Value of Ultrasound Continuous Tracking in the Early Diagnosis of Dangerous Placenta Previa with Placenta Implantation
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）05-0178-03
作者:
许春雨; 蔡爱露
（东北国际医院妇产超声科，辽宁 沈阳 110000）
Author(s):
XU Chun-yu; CAI Ai-lu
(The Obstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasound Department,Northeast International Hospital,Shenyang 110000,Liaoning,China)
关键词:
超声连续追踪; 凶险型前置胎盘; 胎盘植入; 早期诊断
Keywords:
Ultrasound continuous tracking; Dangerous placenta previa; Placenta implantation; Early diagnosis
分类号:
R445.1；R714.6+2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.05.048
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究超声连续追踪对凶险型前置胎盘伴胎盘植入的早期诊断价值。方法 选取2019年4月-2021年4月我院接诊62例凶险型前置胎盘患者为观察组，其中伴胎盘植入22例，未伴胎盘植入40例，并选取同期我院接诊的60例非凶险型前置胎盘孕妇为对照组。比较两组孕妇不同孕囊位置情况、不同孕周孕妇与胎盘距宫颈内口距离情况、孕22~26周孕妇胎盘距宫内口＜50 mm中前壁胎盘与后壁胎盘发生情况、孕30~32周前壁和后壁胎盘孕妇不同胎盘类型发生情况。结果 观察组孕妇孕早期孕囊位置在宫腔下1/2发生率大于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组孕14~20周胎盘距宫内口＜30 mm发生率大于对照组，孕22~26周胎盘距宫内口＜50 mm发生率大于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；伴胎盘植入孕妇前壁胎盘发生率高于未伴胎盘植入孕妇及对照组，后壁胎盘发生率低于未伴胎盘植入孕妇及对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；孕30~32周，前壁胎盘孕妇中央型胎盘发生率高于后壁胎盘，部分型、边缘型胎盘发生率均低于后壁胎盘，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 连续超声追踪可显示不同孕期孕囊位置、胎盘距宫颈内口距离、胎盘位置以及胎盘类型，为凶险型前置胎盘伴胎盘植入诊断提供可靠的参考依据，有助于临床早期防范，改善妊娠结局。
Abstract:
Objective To study the value of ultrasound continuous tracking in the early diagnosis of dangerous placenta previa with placenta implantation.Methods A total of 62 patients with pernicious placenta previa admitted to our hospital from April 2019 to April 2021 were selected as observation group, including 22 cases with placenta implantation and 40 cases without placenta implantation, and 60 pregnant women with non-pernicious placenta previa admitted to our hospital during the same period were selected as control group. The incidences of different placenta types in pregnant women with different gestational sac positions, distances between pregnant women with different gestational weeks and placentas from the cervical orifice, placentas from pregnant women with gestational weeks 22-26 from the cervical orifice <50 mm in the anterior and posterior placentas, and pregnant women with gestational weeks 30-32 from the anterior and posterior placentas were compared between the two groups.Results The incidence of 1/2 of the gestational sac position under the uterine cavity in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of placental distance <30 mm at 14-20 weeks of pregnancy in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the incidence of placental distance <50 mm at 22-26 weeks of pregnancy was higher than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of anterior placenta in pregnant women with placenta implantation was higher than that in pregnant women without placenta implantation and the control group, and the incidence of posterior placenta in pregnant women with placenta implantation was lower than that in pregnant women without placenta implantation and the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). At 30-32 weeks of gestation, the incidence of central placenta in pregnant women with anterior placenta was higher than that of posterior placenta, and the incidence of partial and marginal placenta was lower than that of posterior placenta, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Continuous ultrasound tracking can show the position of gestational sac, the distance between placenta and cervical orifice, the position of placenta and the type of placenta in different pregnancy, and provide reliable reference for the diagnosis of dangerous placenta previa with placenta implantation, which is helpful to early clinical prevention and improve pregnancy outcomes.

参考文献/References:

[1]崔世红,职云晓,张凯,等.腹主动脉球囊阻断术在中央型前置胎盘伴胎盘植入孕妇剖宫产术中的应用[J].中华妇产科杂志,2016,51(9):672-677.[2]Daglar K,Tokmak A,Kirbas A,etal. Anterior placenta previa is associated with increased umbilical cord blood hematocrit concenrations[J].J Neonatal Perinatal Med,2016,9(3):279-284.[3]吕斌,陈锰,刘兴会.前置胎盘孕妇围产期行子宫切除术的危险因素分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2016,51(7):498-502.[4]宋丽丽,殷悦,刘丽娟.子宫动脉栓塞术在凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入剖宫产患者中的应用[J].山东医药,2020,60(25):62-65.[5]种轶文,张爱青,王妍,等.超声评分系统预测胎盘植入凶险程度的价值[J].中华围产医学杂志,2016,19(9):705-709.[6]曹燕,耿秀艳,赵长燕,等.产前超声在凶险型前置胎盘合并胎盘植入诊断中的应用价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(10):2237-2239.[7]李黎,高芬,蔡萍,等.产前MRI与超声对凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入的诊断价值[J].中国产前诊断杂志,2018,10(1):34-37.[8]陆燕飞,宋海国,黄蔚,等.超声联合MＲI检查前置胎盘、产前胎盘植入的临床价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2019,29(4):699-702.[9]李允广,尹忠侠,霍娜娜.胎盘植入患者剖宫产术中剥离胎盘时机选取及妊娠结局分析[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2020,28(2):4.[10]李方燕,朱霞,宋玲玲,等.磁共振成像对产前胎盘植入的诊断价值[J].重庆医学,2017,46(7):960-963.[11]王钦,高春燕,熊希,等.彩色多普勒超声诊断妊娠子宫嵌顿并胎盘植入1例[J].中国医学影像技术,2021,37(5):758.[12]刘明,王雁玲.胎儿死亡的胎盘病理[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2017,33(11):1151-1157.[13]李琴,邓学东,王中阳,等.凶险型前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的产前超声诊断分析[J].中华医学超声杂志,2016,13(3):218-223.[14]廖姗姗,栗娜,刘彩霞,等.三维能量多普勒超声产前诊断凶险性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入价值研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2017,33(12):1262-1266.[15]谷豫鸣,魏俊,熊常君,等.超声检查与磁共振在植入性凶险型前置胎盘中的诊断价值[J].中国医药导报,2016,13(4):105-108.[16]汪玉丽,钟利捷,周穗华,等.凶险型前置胎盘并胎盘植入的超声诊断声像图特征[J].医学影像学杂志2017,27(8):1533-1535.[17]Lyell DJ,Faucett AM,Baer RJ,et al.Maternal serum markers,characteristics and morbidly adherent placenta in women with previa[J].J Perinatol,2016,35(8):570-574.[18]单华英,费敬英,查艺葆,等.前置胎盘孕妇产前超声在胎盘植入诊断中的价值[J].中华全科医学,2017,15(7):1163-1165.[19]雷晓真,郑九生,黄淑晖,等.超声连续追踪对凶险型前置胎盘伴胎盘植入的早期诊断价值[J].江西医药,2017,12(5):1275-1276.[20]李颖.彩色多普勒超声产前诊断凶险性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的临床价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(12):5180-5183.

相似文献/References:

[1]熊 丽,蒋明珉,何娅娟.综合护理干预在凶险型前置胎盘的应用研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(04):177.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.04.059]
　XIONG Li,JIANG Ming-min,HE Ya-juan.Application of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention in Sinister Placenta Previa[J].Medical Information,2019,32(05):177.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.04.059]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01