[1]蒙新宇.微创下置管抽吸液化引流手术治疗脑出血的临床效果探讨[J].医学信息,2022,35(11):124-126.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.032]
　MENG Xin-yu.Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Aspiration and Liquefaction Drainage in the Treatment of Cerebral Hemorrhage[J].Medical Information,2022,35(11):124-126.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.032]
点击复制

微创下置管抽吸液化引流手术治疗脑出血的临床效果探讨()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年11期
页码:
124-126
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2022-06-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Aspiration and Liquefaction Drainage in the Treatment of Cerebral Hemorrhage
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）11-0124-03
作者:
蒙新宇
（天津市宝坻区人民医院神经外科，天津 301800）
Author(s):
MENG Xin-yu
(Department of Neurosurgery,Baodi District People’s Hospital,Tianjin 301800,China)
关键词:
出血; 微创置管抽吸液化引流; 小骨窗开颅血肿清除术; 神经功能; 炎症反应
Keywords:
Cerebral hemorrhage; Minimally invasive catheter aspiration liquefaction drainage; Small bone window craniotomy for hematoma removal; Nerve function; Inflammatory response
分类号:
R743
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.032
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨微创下置管抽吸液化引流手术治疗脑出血的临床效果。方法 选择2020年4月-2021年4月天津市宝坻区人民医院神经外科收治的92例脑出血患者，依据随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组，各46例。对照组行小骨窗开颅血肿清除术治疗，观察组采用微创置管抽吸液化引流术治疗，比较两组血肿清除率、术后再出血率、降钙素原（PCT）、肿瘤坏死因子（TNF-α）、神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）、并发症情况、神经功能及预后情况。结果 观察组血肿清除率大于对照组，且术后再出血率小于对照组（P＜0.05）；两组PCT、TNF-α、NSE水平均低于治疗前，且观察组低于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组术后并发症发生率低于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组NIHSS评分低于对照组，SSS评分高于对照组（P＜0.05）；术后6个月，观察组GOS评分高于对照组，ADL评分低于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 微创置管抽吸液化引流手术对脑出血患者具有良好的血肿清除效果，可降低其再出血风险及局部炎症反应，且术后并发症少，有利于患者神经功能及预后质量的改善。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of minimally invasive aspiration and liquefaction drainage in the treatment of cerebral hemorrhage.Methods Ninety-two patients with cerebral hemorrhage admitted to Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Baodi District People’s Hospital from April 2020 to April 2021 were selected and divided into control group and observation group according to random number table method, with 46 cases in each group. The control group was treated with small bone window craniotomy for hematoma removal, and the observation group was treated with minimally invasive catheter aspiration and liquefaction drainage. The hematoma clearance rate, postoperative rebleeding rate, procalcitonin (PCT), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), complications, neurological function and prognosis were compared between the two groups.Results The hematoma clearance rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the postoperative rebleeding rate was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The levels of PCT, TNF-α and NSE in the two groups were lower than those before treatment, and those in the observation group were lower than the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The NIHSS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the SSS score was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). At 6 months after operation, the GOS score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the ADL score was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Minimally invasive catheter suction liquefaction drainage surgery has good hematoma removal effect for patients with cerebral hemorrhage, which can reduce the risk of rebleeding and local inflammatory response, and has less postoperative complications, meawhileit’s conducive to the improvement of neurological function and prognosis quality of patients.

参考文献/References:

[1]孔琦.软通道微创介入治疗高血压脑出血的效果[J].中国继续医学教育,2021,13(20):154-156.[2]薛文.高血压脑出血予以微创下置管抽吸液化引流手术治疗效果及对神经功能的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2021,21(13):2309-2310.[3]李越,李辉,欧海荣,等.微创血肿清除术联合腰大池置管引流治疗高血压脑出血破入脑室的临床观察[J].广东医科大学学报,2021,39(4):421-423.[4]崔博.脑出血微创手术+置管吸引手术对老年脑出血患者神经功能的影响[J].黑龙江医药科学,2021,44(3):52-53.[5]陈霓红,赵红东,蒋伏平,等.液体衰减反转恢复序列血管高信号与前循环大血管闭塞性卒中患者血管内机械血栓切除术后转归的相关性[J].国际脑血管病杂志,2020,28(8):574-580.[6]]樊保华,王学富,杨国瑛,等.直切口小骨窗经侧裂入路血肿清除术治疗基底节脑出血的疗效[J].安徽医学,2018,39(7):863-866.[7]傅佳峰,杨国芳,张春亭,等.高血压脑出血不同术式疗效比较[J].浙江创伤外科,2021,26(2):371-373.[8]陈丽,李明军.通腑开窍涤痰汤辅助神经保护类西药治疗高血压性脑出血微创术后的临床疗效观察[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2020,18(16):2722-2725.[9]陈晓峰,赵文华.微创下置管抽吸液化引流术在脑出血患者中的效果及对其神经功能、炎性细胞因子水平的影响[J].贵州医药,2021,45(2):212-213.[10]李文添,吴世强,关惠东,等.微创下置管抽吸液化引流手术治疗脑出血的临床效果[J].吉林医学,2020,41(5):1165-1166.[11]王杰.高血压脑出血予以微创下置管抽吸液化引流手术治疗的效果及对神经功能的影响[J].中外医学研究,2020,18(2):126-127.[12]宋安军,伍国锋,任思颖,等.立体定向微创不同穿刺针数对清除颅内血肿及降低颅内压效果的临床对照研究[J].中国临床神经科学,2019,27(6):664-670.[13]Kim M,Cooper J,Al-Mufti F,et al.Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Managing Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Cardiol in Rev,2021,29(1):5-9.[14]王文娟,刘丽萍,杨中华,等.幕上高血压性脑出血微创颅内血肿抽吸引流术1年预后相关因素分析[J].中国卒中杂志,2018,13(7):656-661.[15]向开诚.微创下置管抽吸液化引流术治疗脑出血患者临床效果观察[J].临床合理用药杂志,2018,11(25):20-21.[16]郭清保,李立宏,杨彦龙,等.微创下置管抽吸液化引流术联合依达拉奉对脑出血患者的疗效分析[J].现代生物医学进展,2017,17(30):5849-5852.[17]杨永青,杨瑞林,赵志靖,等.微创下置管抽吸液化引流手术治疗脑出血的临床效果及对神经功能、炎性因子水平的影响[J].疑难病杂志,2016,15(9):912-915.[18]Eliava SS,Belousova OB,Pilipenko YV,et al.Surgical treatment of patients with cerebral aneurysms in the acute stage of rupture:dynamics of results during 2006-2018[J].Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko,2019,83(5):5-13.[19]黄蔚文.微创下置管抽吸液化引流术对脑出血患者的疗效分析[J].实用中西医结合临床,2018,18(3):33-35.

相似文献/References:

[1]龚立云.西咪替丁联合泮托拉唑治疗急性胃黏膜病变并出血的临床观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(02):133.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.00.049]
　GONG li-yun.Clinical Observation of Cimetidine Combined with Pantoprazole in the Treatment of Acute Gastric Mucosal Lesion and Hemorrhage[J].Medical Information,2018,31(11):133.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.00.049]
[2]王尉霖,张 健.氨甲环酸在髋膝关节置换中的应用研究进展[J].医学信息,2018,31(07):39.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.014]
　WANG Wei-lin,ZHANG Jian.Progress in the Study of Hip and Knee Replacement in Tranexamic Acid[J].Medical Information,2018,31(11):39.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.014]
[3]冉瑞图,苏 帅,唐先圣,等.影响PCNL术后出血栓塞治疗的主要因素分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(11):124.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.11.036]
　RAN Rui-tu,SU Shuai,TANG Xian-sheng,et al.Analysis of Main Factors Affecting Thromboembolism After PCNL[J].Medical Information,2019,32(11):124.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.11.036]
[4]桑腮芳.胃黏膜保护剂联合质子泵抑制剂治疗消化性溃疡伴出血的临床效果[J].医学信息,2024,37(02):149.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.02.031]
　SANG Sai-fang.Clinical Effect of Gastric Mucosal Protective Agent Combined with Hydrogen Pump Inhibitors in the Treatment of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding[J].Medical Information,2024,37(11):149.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.02.031]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01