[1]孙春阳,赵长海.腹腔镜下修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的疗效及对VAS评分的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(16):63-66.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.013]
　SUN Chun-yang,ZHAO Chang-hai.Effect of Laparoscopic Repair in the Treatment of Perforated Gastroduodenal Ulcer and its Effect on the Visual Analogue Scale[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(16):63-66.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.013]
点击复制

腹腔镜下修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的疗效及对VAS评分的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年16期
页码:
63-66
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2022-08-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Laparoscopic Repair in the Treatment of Perforated Gastroduodenal Ulcer and its Effect on the Visual Analogue Scale
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）16-0063-04
作者:
孙春阳; 赵长海
（佳木斯市中心医院普外科，黑龙江 佳木斯 154000）
Author(s):
SUN Chun-yang; ZHAO Chang-hai
(Department of General Surgery,Jiamusi Central Hospital,Jiamusi 154000,Heilongjiang,China)
关键词:
胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔; 腹腔镜下修补术; 应激反应
Keywords:
Perforated gastroduodenal ulcer; Laparoscopic repair; Stress reaction
分类号:
R656.62
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究腹腔镜下修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的临床疗效及对患者疼痛程度的影响。方法 选取2019年2月-2022年2月佳木斯市中心医院收治的68例胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者，根据随机数字表法分为对照组（34例）与观察组（34例），对照组行传统开腹手术治疗，观察组行腹腔镜下修补术治疗。比较两组临床疗效、围术期指标（手术时间、术中出血量、胃肠道功能恢复时间、术后住院时间）、疼痛程度（VAS评分）、应激反应指标[C反应蛋白（CRP）、白介素-6（IL-6）、肿瘤坏死因子α（TNF-α）]及术后并发症发生情况。结果 两组治疗总有效率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；观察组手术时间、胃肠道功能恢复时间、术后住院时间均短于对照组，且术后出血量少于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组术后24 h VAS评分低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组CRP、IL-6、TNF-α水平均高于术前，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），观察组CRP、IL-6、TNF-α水平低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组术后并发症发生率低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 腹腔镜下修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔疗效确切，该法手术时间短、术中出血少、患者术后恢复快，疼痛程度及应激反应轻微，且手术并发症少，安全性高。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic repair in the treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer and its effect on the visual analogue scale (VAS).Methods Sixty-eight patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcer admitted to Jiamusi Central Hospital from February 2019 to February 2022 were selected and divided into control group (34 cases) and observation group (34 cases) according to the random number table method. The control group was treated with traditional laparotomy, and the observation group was treated with laparoscopic repair. The clinical efficacy, perioperative indicators (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, gastrointestinal function recovery time, postoperative hospital stay), pain degree ( VAS score), stress response indicators [C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor α(TNF-α)] and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, gastrointestinal function recovery time and postoperative hospital stay in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, and the postoperative bleeding volume was less than that in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The VAS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group at 24 h after operation, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The levels of CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α in the two groups were higher than those before operation (P<0.05); while the levels of CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic repair is effective in the treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer. This method has short operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, rapid postoperative recovery, mild pain and stress response, fewer complications and high safety.

参考文献/References:

[1]吴建全,党张峰,马艳,等.胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者行微创修补手术效果研究[J].贵州医药,2019,43(12):1897-1898.[2]Fransvea P,Costa G,Lepre L,et al.Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer in the Elderly: An Interim Analysis of the FRAILESEL Italian Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study[J].Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques,2020,31(1):2-7.[3]佘恒海,吴卫东.腹腔镜下胃十二指肠穿孔修补术与开腹修补术对胃肠动力的影响研究[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2020,26(4):650-653.[4]柴大林,李光云,闫金亮.腹腔镜下穿孔修补术对胃溃疡合并胃穿孔患者的临床效果及胃肠功能的影响[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2020,25(6):753-756.[5]刘猛,张如山,邹大朋,等.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗老年胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的疗效及对COX-2、NF-κB、IL-8、IL-17表达的影响[J].海军医学杂志,2020,41(1):46-50.[6]袁耀宗,王贞贞.消化性溃疡诊断与治疗规范[J].中华消化杂志,2016,36(8):508-513.[7]王艳良,陈涛.腹腔镜胃十二指肠修补术对消化性溃疡急性穿孔患者的疗效及预后的影响[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2019,24(11):1285-1287.[8]叶群立,张洋洋,罗金健,等.腹腔镜修补术对老年胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者术后肠道功能及血清T细胞亚群、降钙素原水平的影响[J].中国临床医生杂志,2019,47(11):1339-1342.[9]敖锋,陈星园,张振霖,等.腹腔镜与开腹胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术的比较研究[J].国际外科学杂志,2019(9):601-605.[10]刘友春,邵焓.腹腔镜下修补术对老年胃穿孔的疗效[J].贵州医科大学学报,2018,43(3):349-352.[11]林成平.腹腔镜修补术对消化性溃疡穿孔患者并发症及康复的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(15):2584-2586.[12]周胜,王林泉,赵旭东,等.腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术对胃穿孔的疗效及对患者胃电参数的影响[J].河北医学,2018,24(11):1862-1866.[13]叶善平,方传发,张磊,等.3D和2D腹腔镜胃十二指肠穿孔修补术的疗效分析[J].中华消化外科杂志,2018,17(9):919-923.[14]蒋文军,李治熹,徐冰,等.腹腔镜与传统开腹手术治疗小儿胃十二指肠穿孔的临床疗效比较[J].西部医学,2018,30(7):998-1001.[15]马力.腹腔镜修补术治疗胃和十二指肠溃疡穿孔的疗效及对患者免疫功能的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(6):509-512.[16]周军,何杰,邹恩纪.腹腔镜下修补术对胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔临床治疗效果、炎性因子及T细胞免疫功能的影响[J].临床误诊误治,2021,34(4):70-75.[17]向桂华,黄建华,武正陆,等.腹腔镜修补术治疗老年十二指肠溃疡合并穿孔的疗效分析[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2018,17(2):124-127.[18]刘志国.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的临床效果及对免疫功能的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2018,18(2):249-251.[19]侯花屏,冯江,刘新奇,等.腹腔镜下穿孔修补术治疗老年胃溃疡合并胃穿孔的临床观察[J].老年医学与保健,2017,23(6):502-504.[20]姚志刚,胡国华,汪琳琳,等.腹腔镜修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的临床应用价值[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2017,22(11):813-815.[21]吴世乐,郭亚民,吴新民,等.胃穿孔腹腔镜修补术的手术方法及临床效果观察[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2017,20(4):306-308.[22]Pokydko MI,Formanchuk TV,Goncharenko OV,et al.The complex treatment of patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers[J].Reports of Vinnytsia National Medical University,2018,22(3):479-484.[23]杨彦,谭昌静,杨效东,等.腹腔镜下修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的疗效及对VAS评分的影响[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2022,25(3):222-224.[24]李哲恒,陈宝龙,田孜博,等.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗胃十二指肠穿孔的疗效比较[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2017,26(1):84-86.

相似文献/References:

[1]万玉峰.腹腔镜下修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的疗效及对患者疼痛的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(05):119.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.05.022]
　WAN Yu-feng.Efficacy of Laparoscopic Repair in the Treatment of Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation and its Effect on Patients’ Pain[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(16):119.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.05.022]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01