[1]万玉峰.腹腔镜下修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的疗效及对患者疼痛的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(05):119-122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.05.022]
　WAN Yu-feng.Efficacy of Laparoscopic Repair in the Treatment of Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation and its Effect on Patients’ Pain[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(05):119-122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.05.022]
点击复制

腹腔镜下修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的疗效及对患者疼痛的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年05期
页码:
119-122
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy of Laparoscopic Repair in the Treatment of Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation and its Effect on Patients’ Pain
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）05-0119-04
作者:
万玉峰
（佳木斯市中心医院普外一科，黑龙江 佳木斯 154003）
Author(s):
WAN Yu-feng
(The First Department of General Surgery,Jiamusi Central Hospital,Jiamusi 154003,Heilongjiang,China)
关键词:
腹腔镜下修补术; 胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔; 胃功能
Keywords:
Laparoscopic repair; Gastroduodenal ulcer perforation; Gastric function
分类号:
R656.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.05.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨腹腔镜下修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的疗效及对患者疼痛的影响。方法 选取2021年5月-2022年5月在我院诊治的66例胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各组33例。对照组采用常规开腹术治疗，观察组采用腹腔镜下修补术治疗，比较两组临床疗效、手术指标、疼痛（VAS）评分、胃功能指标[（胃动素（MTL）、胃泌素（GAS）]及并发症发生率。结果 观察组总有效率为93.94%，高于对照组的81.82%（P＜0.05）；观察组手术时间、术中出血量、胃肠功能恢复时间、下床活动时间均小于对照组（P＜0.05）；术后2 h两组疼痛评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），术后8、24 h观察组疼痛评分均低于对照组（P＜0.05）；两组MTL、GAS水平均高于术前，且观察组高于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组并发症发生率为6.06%，低于对照组的18.18%（P＜0.05）。结论 腹腔镜下修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔效果确切，可减轻患者疼痛评分，改善手术指标，促进胃功能恢复，且可降低并发症发生率，是一种安全、有效的治疗方案。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of laparoscopic repair on gastroduodenal ulcer perforation and its effect on patients’ pain.Methods A total of 66 patients with gastroduodenal ulcer perforation diagnosed and treated in our hospital from May 2021 to May 2022 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 33 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional laparotomy, and the observation group was treated with laparoscopic repair. The clinical efficacy, surgical indicators, pain (VAS) score, gastric function indicators [motilin (MTL), gastrin (GAS)] and complication rate were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 93.94%, which was higher than 81.82% of the control group (P<0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, gastrointestinal function recovery time and ambulation time in the observation group were less than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in pain scores between the two groups at 2 h after operation (P>0.05). The pain scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group at 8 and 24 h after operation (P<0.05). The levels of MTL and GAS in the two groups were higher than those before operation, and those in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 6.06%, which was lower than 18.18% in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic repair is effective in the treatment of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation, which can reduce the pain score, improve the surgical index, promote the recovery of gastric function, and reduce the incidence of complications. It is a safe and effective treatment.

参考文献/References:

[1]杨德赞.腹腔镜技术在外科急腹症中的应用[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2018,28(14):177-178.[2]Reusens H,Dassonville M,Steyaert H.Laparoscopic repair for per forated peptic ulcer in children[J].Eur J Pediatr Surg,2017,27(3):251-254.[3]张声生,王垂杰.消化性溃疡中医诊疗专家共识意见(2017)[J].中华中医药杂志,2017,32(9):4089-4093.[4]张华,陆帅,王志勇.雷贝拉唑和艾司奥美拉唑治疗十二指肠溃疡的效果比较及对CRP和IL-8及IL-16的影响[J].广东医学,2020,41(14):105-108.[5]陈炳勋,彭朝阳,吴勤祥,等.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗老年胃溃疡并穿孔的疗效观察[J].中国普通外科杂志,2020,29(10):120-124.[6]Huston JM,Kreiner L,Ho VP,et al.Role of empiric Anti-Fungal therapy in the treatment of perforated peptic ulcer disease: review of the evidence and future directions[J].Surg Infect (Larchmt),2019,20(8):593-600.[7]陈钢,刘业星,张朝军,等.胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔连续5年115例非手术治愈报道[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2017,20(7):820-823.[8]崔龙.急性胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的保守治疗[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2018,27(1):107-108.[9]陈钢,刘业星,庄哲宏,等.宽适应证非手术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔[J].中华普通外科杂志,2016,31(10):828-831.[10]方旭东,方晓明,龚谋春,等.腹腔镜下消化性溃疡穿孔修补术经验总结及中转开腹的原因分析[J].现代仪器与医疗,2018,24(3):28-29,53．[11]叶群立,张洋洋,罗金健,等.腹腔镜修补术对老年胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者术后肠道功能及血清 T细胞亚群、降钙素原水平的影响[J].中国临床医生杂志,2019,47(11):1339-1342．[12]胡加文.腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术对胃溃疡并发胃穿孔患者手术相关指标、血清胃泌素及炎性因子水平影响[J].临床军医杂志,2019,47(6):652-653.[13]余新国.腹腔镜上消化道穿孔修补术用于上消化道穿孔修补临床疗效及安全性研究[J].浙江创伤外科,2019,24(1):85-87.[14]周邦,叶华平.腹腔镜治疗老年胃十二指肠穿孔患者对临床效果、相关时间指标及并发症分析[J].中外医学研究,2018,16(5):45-46.[15]康安.腹腔镜下十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术和开腹手术治疗的临床效果及安全性分析[J].基层医学论坛,2018,22(19):2672-2673.[16]吴健瑜,卢蔚起,潘远元,等.胃十二指肠溃疡急性穿孔患者腹腔镜下修补术后联合三联疗法治疗的临床疗效[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2018,21(4):607-609.[17]周军,何杰,邹恩纪.腹腔镜下修补术对胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔临床治疗效果、炎性因子及T细胞免疫功能的影响[J].临床误诊误治,2021,22(4):70-73.[18]伍贵祥,邓建民.腹腔镜下急性胃十二指肠穿孔修补术对胃肠道功能的影响[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2017,20(2):134-136.[19]董红平.腹腔镜下胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术33例临床疗效分析[J].承德医学院学报,2020,15(2):38-41.[20]刘宏帅.腹腔镜下穿孔修补术与开腹修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的效果比较[J].河南医学研究,2017,27(6):18-22.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙春阳,赵长海.腹腔镜下修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的疗效及对VAS评分的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(16):63.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.013]
　SUN Chun-yang,ZHAO Chang-hai.Effect of Laparoscopic Repair in the Treatment of Perforated Gastroduodenal Ulcer and its Effect on the Visual Analogue Scale[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(05):63.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.013]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01