[1]丁邦平,赖媛媛.空气灌肠整复术治疗小儿肠套叠的效果[J].医学信息,2022,35(19):75-77.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.19.020]
 DING Bang-ping,LAI Yuan-yuan.Effect of Air Enema Reduction in Treatment of Pediatric Intussusception[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(19):75-77.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.19.020]
点击复制

空气灌肠整复术治疗小儿肠套叠的效果()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年19期
页码:
75-77
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2022-10-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Air Enema Reduction in Treatment of Pediatric Intussusception
文章编号:
1006-1959(2022)19-0075-03
作者:
丁邦平赖媛媛
(1.兴国县妇幼保健院儿科,江西 兴国 342400;2.兴国县中医院眼科,江西 兴国 342400)
Author(s):
DING Bang-pingLAI Yuan-yuan
(1.Department of Pediatrics,Xingguo County Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Xingguo 342400,Jiangxi,China;2.Department of Ophthalmology,Xingguo County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Xingguo 342400,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
小儿肠套叠空气灌肠整复术胃激素肿瘤坏死因子-α
Keywords:
Pediatric intussusceptionAir enema reductionGastric hormoneTumor necrosis factor-α
分类号:
R574.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.19.020
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析空气灌肠整复术治疗小儿肠套叠的效果。方法 选择2018年3月-2020年7月兴国县妇幼保健院收治的60例肠套叠患儿,按照住院号尾数的单双数分为试验组和对照组,各30例。对照组实施钡灌肠整复术,试验组实施空气灌肠整复术,比较两组炎性指标[肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白介素-1(IL-1)]、胃肠激素[胃泌素(GAS)、胃动素(MTL)]、康复指标、复位及预后情况。结果 术后24 h,两组TNF-α、hs-CRP、IL-1、GAS、MTL水平低于术前,且试验组低于对照组(P<0.05);试验组复位时间、便血改善时间、肠道功能恢复时间短于对照组,灌肠压力、术后2 h VAS评分低于对照组(P<0.05);试验组复位成功率为93.33%,高于对照组的66.67%(P<0.05);试验组24 h复发率、并发症发生率低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 小儿肠套叠应用空气灌肠整复术治疗具有复位时间短、灌肠压力小、复位成功率高、并发症发生率低等优点,且对胃肠道激素影响小,不会增强机体炎性状态,远期预后好。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the effect of air enema in the treatment of pediatric intussusception.Methods Sixty children with intussusception admitted to Xingguo County Maternal and Child Health Hospital from March 2018 to July 2020 were selected and divided into experimental group and control group according to the odd and even numbers of the tails in the order of admission, with 30 cases in each group. The control group was treated with barium enema, and the experimental group was treated with air enema. The inflammatory indexes [tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-1 (IL-1)], gastrointestinal hormones [gastrin (GAS), motilin (MTL)], rehabilitation indexes, reduction and prognosis were compared between the two groups.Results At 24 h after operation, the levels of TNF-α, hs-CRP, IL-1, GAS and MTL in the two groups were lower than those before operation, and those in the experimental group were lower than the control group (P<0.05). The reduction time, improvement time of hematochezia and recovery time of intestinal function in the experimental group were shorter than those in the control group, and the enema pressure and VAS score at 2 h after operation were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The success rate of reduction in the experimental group was 93.33%, which was higher than 66.67% in the control group (P<0.05). The 24 h recurrence rate and complication rate of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion Air enema reduction in the treatment of pediatric intussusception has the advantages of short reduction time, low enema pressure, high reduction success rate and low complication rate. And it has little effect on gastrointestinal hormones, does not enhance the inflammatory state of the body, and has a good long-term prognosis.

参考文献/References:

[1]吴佩群,杨敏,耿岚岚.儿童肠息肉继发肠套叠27例临床分析[J].临床儿科杂志,2021,39(9):703-705.[2]李俊峰,管哲明,杜浩文,等.B超引导下水灌肠治疗小儿肠套叠整复成功率与水压值的相关性分析[J].解放军医学院学报,2020,41(1):53-55,69.[3]Kotb M,Abdelaziz M,Abdelmeguid Y,et al.Gastroduodenal Intussusception Due to Gastric Mucosal Prolapse Polyp in a 2-Year-Old Child[J].Fetal Pediatr Pathol,2021,40(5):511-517.[4]倪良军,刘创,陈兰香,等.空气灌肠整复术治疗小儿肠套叠的临床应用效果分析[J].中国中西医结合消化杂志,2019,27(6):476-479.[5]李军,骆平.经脐腹腔镜辅助治疗小儿肠套叠的临床疗效分析[J].实用医学杂志,2018,34(23):4011-4013.[6]李璐璐,孙厚坦,赵威武,等.超声监视下温盐水灌肠复位治疗小儿肠套叠效果观察[J].西北国防医学杂志,2018,39(4):259-262.[7]李伟燎,唐华建,周小渔,等.肠套叠空气灌肠前应用解痉药物的疗效评价[J].海南医学,2018,29(17):2480-2482.[8]余远曙.小儿肠套叠的发病时间对空气灌肠整复成功率的影响[J].浙江临床医学,2017,19(7):1304-1305.[9]曹诗林,林育成,宁丽洁.探讨X线下空气灌肠法在小儿肠套叠整复治疗中的应用效果[J].黑龙江医药,2021,34(3):697-699.[10]李志雄,陈江谊,陆金荣,等.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗小儿难复性肠套叠效果对比分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2017,38(7):787-789.[11]常跃春,赵晶.511例儿童急性肠套叠病例临床流行病学特征分析[J].中国病案,2021,22(1):104-106.[12]杨合英,王冠涛,李延安,等.水压灌肠复位治疗原发性肠套叠的有效性及安全性分析[J].中华普通外科杂志,2021,36(2):143-144.[13]张龙,杨军,余世万,等.超声引导下水压灌肠对急性肠套叠患儿应激反应及胃肠激素的影响[J].实用医院临床杂志,2021,18(1):27-30.[14]倪良军,刘创,陈兰香,等.空气灌肠整复术治疗小儿肠套叠的临床应用效果分析[J].中国中西医结合消化杂志,2019,27(6):476-479.[15]Pan H,Sun W.Stanford type A acute aortic dissection with proximal intimo-intimal intussusception: a case report and literature review[J].J Cardiothorac Surg,2021,16(1):201.[16]黄卫保,林剑军,梁志杰.儿童肠套叠空气灌肠整复时X线表现特点分析[J].广西医学,2017,39(9):1424-1426.

相似文献/References:

[1]曹立红.探讨腹部超声联合浅表超声对小儿肠套叠的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2019,32(19):168.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.19.056]
 CAO Li-hong.To Explore the Diagnostic Value of Abdominal Ultrasound Combined with Superficial Ultrasound in Children with Intussusception[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(19):168.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.19.056]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01