[1]丁葵花,潘龙娥.健康教育路径在择期剖宫产护理质量中的应用[J].医学信息,2022,35(19):183-185.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.19.052]
　DING Kui-hua,PAN Long-e.Application of Health Education Pathway in Nursing Quality of Elective Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(19):183-185.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.19.052]
点击复制

健康教育路径在择期剖宫产护理质量中的应用()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年19期
页码:
183-185
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2022-10-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of Health Education Pathway in Nursing Quality of Elective Cesarean Section
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）19-0183-03
作者:
丁葵花; 潘龙娥
（奉新县人民医院妇产科，江西 奉新 330700）
Author(s):
DING Kui-hua; PAN Long-e
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Fengxin County People’s Hospital,Fengxin 330700,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
剖宫产; 护理质量; 健康教育路径; 便秘; 遵医嘱行为
Keywords:
Cesarean section; Quality of nursing; Health education path; Constipation; Compliance behavior
分类号:
R473.71
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.19.052
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察健康教育路径对择期剖宫产护理质量中的临床作用。方法 选取2018年10月-2020年10月我院接收的72例择期剖宫产孕妇，随机分为对照组和观察组，每组36例。对照组实施传统健康教育，观察组应用健康教育路径进行干预。比较两组产妇健康知识掌握度、遵医嘱情况、并发症、护理质量及母乳喂养情况。结果 观察组健康知识掌握度高于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组遵医嘱优良率为83.33%，高于对照组的61.11%（P＜0.05）；观察组并发症发生率为8.33%，低于对照组的27.78%（P＜0.05）；观察组护理质量高于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组母乳喂养成功率为77.78%，高于对照组的55.56%（P＜0.05）。结论 健康教育路径的实施有助于择期剖宫产护理质量的提升，可改善产妇的知识掌握度及遵医嘱行为，降低手术并发症风险，提升母乳喂养成功率。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the clinical effect of health education pathway on nursing quality of elective cesarean section.Methods A total of 72 pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section received in our hospital from October 2018 to October 2020 were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 36 cases in each group. The control group implemented traditional health education, and the observation group applied health education path for intervention. The maternal health knowledge, compliance with doctor’s advice, complications, nursing quality and breastfeeding were compared between the two groups.Results The mastery of health knowledge in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The excellent and good rate of the observation group was 83.33%, which was higher than 61.11% of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 8.33%, which was lower than 27.78% in the control group (P<0.05). The nursing quality of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The success rate of breastfeeding in the observation group was 77.78%, which was higher than 55.56% in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion The implementation of health education pathway is helpful to improve the nursing quality of elective cesarean section, improve the knowledge mastery and compliance behavior of parturients, reduce the risk of surgical complications and improve the success rate of breastfeeding.

参考文献/References:

[1]Stoll KH,Hauck YL,Downe S,et al.Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education[J].Reproductive Health,2017,14(2):154-157.[2]谢培.健康教育对初产妇剖宫产后母乳喂养依从性和护理服务满意度的影响[J].河南医学研究,2019,28(10):1902-1903.[3]朱家欣.剖宫产产妇开展心理护理联合健康教育对其产后生活质量的影响[J].现代诊断与治疗,2018,29(17):2839-2840.[4]周秀婷,吴敏卿.健康教育路径在剖宫产护理中的应用效果评价[J].中国健康教育,2014,30(10):944-946.[5]裴淑娟,杨余,孙丹.剖宫产产妇实施规范化健康教育后母乳喂养情况调查[J].中国妇幼保健,2018,33(14):3286-3288.[6]杨丽娜.个体化健康教育对首次剖宫产产妇产后母乳喂养及育儿自我效能的影响[J].中国临床医生杂志,2018,46(7):860-862.[7]孟庆中,江春丽,王继欣.饮食干预联合强化健康教育对剖宫产后产妇泌乳及胃肠功能恢复的影响[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2018,23(2):257-259.[8]刘继君.围生期健康教育对剖宫产产妇分娩后疼痛、负面情绪及主观幸福感的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2018,33(6):1213-1215.[9]刘婷婷,费英俊.浅析个体化心理护理联合健康教育对剖宫产产妇的临床影响[J].山西医药杂志,2017,46(22):2809-2811.[10]计学晶.健康教育路径在择期剖宫产护理质量中的成效[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(21):158-159.[11]侯雪梅,敬柏清,滕明春,等.优化产前健康教育模式对缓解分娩焦虑情绪与改善分娩结局的效果评价[J].重庆医学,2016,45(17):2439-2440.[12]李佩丛.健康教育路径对产妇分娩方式、产后抑郁症发生的影响[J].黑龙江医药,2018,31(6):1398-1399.[13]郑翠霞,朱希慧,袁坤,等.个体化健康教育与行为指导对剖宫产产妇母乳喂养的影响[J].护理学杂志,2015,30(6):94-95.[14]贺静.初产妇剖宫产后健康教育护理干预对母乳喂养成功率及依从性的影响[J].护理实践与研究,2018,15(20):77-79.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘汉芬.剖宫产术后护理干预对产妇康复效果的影响分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(01):169.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.01.067]
　LIU Han-fen.Effect of Nursing Intervention on Maternal Rehabilitation after Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):169.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.01.067]
[2]刘 礼.影响剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫足月分娩结局的相关因素分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(02):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.039]
　LIU Li.Analysis of Related Factors Influencing the Outcome of Full Term Delivery of Scar Uterus after Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.039]
[3]李 欢,刘 俊,夏军辉.妊娠期高血压疾病患者血浆Pro BNP水平及其临床意义[J].医学信息,2018,31(04):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.059]
　LI Huan,LIU Jun,XIA Jun-hui.Plasma Pro BNP Levels in Patients with Hypertensive Disorder Complicating Pregnancy and their Clinical Significance[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.059]
[4]鲁秋彤.经阴道彩色多普勒超声在诊断剖宫产子宫疤痕妊娠中的 价值研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):160.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.058]
　LU Qiu-tong.The Value of Transvaginal Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):160.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.058]
[5]蒋红梅.子宫下段横形环状压迫缝合术治疗前置胎盘剖宫产术中 胎盘剥离面出血的临床研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(07):120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.040]
　JIANG Hong-mei.Clinical Study on the Treatment of Placental Exfoliation Bleeding in Caesarean Section of Placenta Previa by Transverse Annular Compression Suture of Lower Uterine Segment[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.040]
[6]冉会仁.小剂量舒芬太尼在剖宫产术麻醉中预防寒战及 牵拉痛的疗效评价[J].医学信息,2018,31(08):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.08.032]
　RAN Hui-ren.Evaluation of the Efficacy of Low-dose Sufentanil in Preventing Chills and Pulling Pain during Cesarean Section Anesthesia[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.08.032]
[7]王玉霞.剖宫产术后子宫疤痕妊娠的临床诊治[J].医学信息,2018,31(10):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.015]
　WANG Yu-xia.Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Uterine Scar Pregnancy after Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.015]
[8]杨瑞芬.护士满意度调查对提高护理质量的效果分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(16):164.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.053]
　YANG Rui-fen.Analysis of the Effect of Nurse Satisfaction Survey on Improving Nursing Quality[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):164.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.053]
[9]熊 丽,蒋明珉,何娅娟.以护士为主导的疼痛管理模式在剖宫产围手术期的应用研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(01):179.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.01.058]
　XIONG Li,JIANG Ming-min,HE Ya-juan.Application Study of Nurse-led Pain Management Model in Perioperative Period of Cesarean Section[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(19):179.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.01.058]
[10]王 颖,石显江,陈斯乔,等.多巴胺预注射在剖宫产腰硬联合麻醉的临床应用[J].医学信息,2019,32(11):150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.11.044]
　WANG Ying,SHI Xian-jiang,CHEN Si-qiao,et al.Clinical Application of Dopamine Pre-injection in Cesarean Section Combined with Spinal Anesthesia[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(19):150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.11.044]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01