[1]邵 婷,陈竹叶.超声弹性成像对乳房占位性病变的鉴别诊断价值[J].医学信息,2023,36(04):143-146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.04.029]
　SHAO Ting,CHEN Zhu-ye.The Value of Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Occupying Lesions[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(04):143-146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.04.029]
点击复制

超声弹性成像对乳房占位性病变的鉴别诊断价值()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年04期
页码:
143-146
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Value of Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Occupying Lesions
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）04-0143-04
作者:
邵 婷; 陈竹叶
（南京市江宁中医院超声诊断科1，功能科2，江苏 南京 211100）
Author(s):
SHAO Ting; CHEN Zhu-ye
(Department of Ultrasound Diagnosis1,Department of Function2,Jiangning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 211100,Jiangsu,China)
关键词:
乳房占位性病变; 超声弹性成像; 弹性系数; 彩色多普勒超声; 诊断敏感性
Keywords:
Breast occupying lesions; Ultrasonic elastography; Elastic coefficient; Color Doppler ultrasound; Diagnostic sensitivity
分类号:
R455.1；R737.9
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.04.029
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究超声弹性成像（UE）对乳房占位性病变的鉴别诊断价值。方法 选取2018年10月-2021年10月南京市江宁中医院收治的82例乳腺结节患者，共104个病灶，依次进行彩色多普勒超声与UE检查，分析UE的诊断价值，以病理学结果为金标准，比较两种检测方式的敏感性、特异性、误诊率、漏诊率与诊断符合率。结果 良性病灶的UE评分低于恶性病灶（P＜0.05），且91.67%良性病灶的UE评分≤3分，90.63%恶性病灶的UE评分≥4分，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；UE诊断乳房占位性病变的敏感性、特异性高于彩色多普勒超声，而误诊率、漏诊率低于彩色多普勒超声（P＜0.05）；UE对乳房占位性病变的诊断符合率（91.35%）高于彩色多普勒超声（86.54%）（P＜0.05）。结论 超声弹性成像在乳房占位性病变的鉴别诊断中具有重要作用，其对乳腺良恶性病变的诊断敏感性、特异性均较为理想，真实性与可靠性高。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the value of ultrasound elastography (UE) in the differential diagnosis of breast occupying lesions.Methods A total of 82 patients with breast nodules admitted to Jiangning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Nanjing from October 2018 to October 2021 were selected, with a total of 104 lesions. Color Doppler ultrasound and UE were performed in turn to analyze the diagnostic value of UE. The pathological results were used as the gold standard to compare the sensitivity, specificity, misdiagnosis rate, missed diagnosis rate and diagnostic coincidence rate of the two detection methods.Results The sensitivity and specificity of UE in the diagnosis of breast occupying lesions were higher than those of color Doppler ultrasound, while the misdiagnosis rate and missed diagnosis rate were lower than those of color Doppler ultrasound (P<0.05). The diagnostic coincidence rate of UE (91.35%) was higher than that of color Doppler ultrasound (86.54%) (P<0.05).Conclusion Ultrasound elastography plays an important role in the differential diagnosis of breast occupying lesions. Its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for benign and malignant breast lesions are ideal, and its authenticity and reliability are high.

参考文献/References:

[1]俞秋雨,方开峰,王燕,等.彩色多普勒超声、超声弹性成像与X线摄影诊断乳腺癌的价值[J].实用放射学杂志,2020,36(10):1663-1665.[2]李明慧,李慧敏,贺玲,等.超声造影和实时组织弹性成像在乳腺肿块鉴别诊断的应用价值[J].新疆医科大学学报,2017,40(3):279-282.[3]何美情,韩磊,刘辉,等.超声弹性成像技术对乳腺癌的诊断价值及其征象与乳腺癌ER等受体的相关性[J].实用癌症杂志,2020,35(8):1343-1346.[4]刘宏,孔祥海,杨媛,等.高频彩色多普勒超声联合弹性成像对乳腺癌与良性增生结节的鉴别诊断价值[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2021,24(5):387-390.[5]Hahn S,Lee YH,Lee SH,et al.Value of the Strain Ratio on Ultrasonic Elastography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Soft Tissue Tumors[J].Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine,2017,5(16):437-443.[6]丰波,黄巧燕,罗晴霞,等.超声弹性成像比值法在乳腺非肿块型病变良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2020,36(6):499-502.[7]张剑,陈卉,徐斌,等.超微血管成像、高级动态血流显像、彩色多普勒血流显像对乳腺微小癌的诊断价值及其与病理肿瘤微血管密度的相关性研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2019,28(9):787-793.[8]Laloy-Borgna G,Zorgani A,Catheline S.Micro-elastography: Toward ultrasonic shear waves in soft solids[J].Applied Physics Letters,2021,118(11):113701.[9]吴文瑛,王晓岩,赵丽,等.超声弹性成像、X线钼靶与超声引导下穿刺活检在BI-RADS4类乳腺肿块鉴别诊断中的价值评估[J].中国普通外科杂志,2019,28(3):377-382.[10]Lu G,Li R,Qian X,et al.Layer-specific ultrasound elastography using a multi-layered shear wave dispersion model for assessing the viscoelastic properties[J].Physics in Medicine & Biology,2021,66(3):35-41.[11]王玉,宣之东,郑雪,等.超声弹性成像技术在乳腺早期占位性病变鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2019,34(2):450-452.[12]钟华,严冬梅,刘圆圆,等.乳腺良恶性病变剪切波弹性成像的典型表现及其鉴别诊断价值[J].现代生物医学进展,2020,20(13):2492-2496.[13]颜红菊,许晓静,张丽,等.超声声触弹性成像对乳腺良恶性肿瘤的鉴别诊断价值[J].浙江医学,2018,40(12):1394-1396.[14]沈朝明,陈淑霞,邬午龙,等.剪切波弹性成像对乳腺癌良恶性的鉴别诊断及误诊分析[J].中华全科医学,2020,18(4):634-637.[15]肖静,董洋,张心茹,等.超声弹性成像在BI-RADS3、4级乳腺病变中的诊断价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2017,28(8):553-555,563.[16]郭丽娟,周文艳,曾丽华.超声弹性成像对乳腺良恶性结节的鉴别诊断价值[J].癌症进展,2017,15(8):900-902,922.[17]孙凤兰,王丹.剪切波超声弹性成像在乳腺肿瘤诊断中的价值[J].中国数字医学,2019,14(2):63-64,81.[18]易芳,康彧,周天志.超声实时组织弹性成像在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变中的价值[J].华西医学,2017,32(7):1046-1049.[19]Peng B,Xian Y,Zhang Q,et al.Neural Network-based Motion Tracking for Breast Ultrasound Strain Elastography: An Initial Assessment of Performance and Feasibility[J].Ultrasonic Imaging,2020,42(9):74-91.[20]王丽丽,孙琦,郭文杰.超声实时剪切波弹性成像与组织弹性成像技术对早期乳腺癌的鉴别诊断价值[J].实用医技杂志,2020,27(7):862-863.[21]龚倩,吴明翠.超声弹性成像与彩色多普勒超声在乳腺良恶性占位病变诊断中的敏感性、特异性及准确性分析[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2017,32(4):463-464.[22]金燕燕,宋会明,王谷一,等.高频彩色多普勒超声与超声弹性成像诊断乳腺癌的临床对比分析[J].医学影像学杂志,2017,27(7):1398-1400.[23]周昊,朱晨霞,周翔,等.常规超声、弹性成像及超声造影对乳腺局灶性纤维化的诊断与鉴别诊断价值[J].临床超声医学杂志,2017,19(1):26-29.[24]Shih CC,Qian X,Teng M,et al.Quantitative assessment of thin-layer tissue viscoelastic properties using ultrasonic micro-elastography with Lamb wave model[J].IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging,2018,37(8):1887-1898.

相似文献/References:

[1]王 东.超声弹性成像在乳腺肿瘤良恶性诊断中的临床价值[J].医学信息,2020,33(16):178.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.16.059]
　WANG Dong.The Clinical Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(04):178.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.16.059]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01