[1]何学君,卿 城.艾普拉唑钠与奥美拉唑钠治疗上消化道出血的疗效比较[J].医学信息,2023,36(18):156-159.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.18.031]
　HE Xue-jun,QING Cheng.Efficacy Comparison of Ilaprazole Sodium and Omeprazole Sodium in the Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(18):156-159.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.18.031]
点击复制

艾普拉唑钠与奥美拉唑钠治疗上消化道出血的疗效比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年18期
页码:
156-159
栏目:
药物与临床
出版日期:
2023-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy Comparison of Ilaprazole Sodium and Omeprazole Sodium in the Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
文章编号:
1006-1959（2023）18-0156-04
作者:
何学君; 卿 城
（1.永修县人民医院消化内科，江西 永修 330300；2.南昌大学第一附属医院重症医学科，江西 南昌 330000）
Author(s):
HE Xue-jun; QING Cheng
(1.Department of Digestive Medicine,Yongxiu County People’s Hospital,Yongxiu 330300,Jiangxi,China;2.Department of Intensive Care Unit,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University,Nanchang 330000,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
艾普拉唑钠; 奥美拉唑钠; 上消化道出血
Keywords:
Ilaprazole sodium; Omeprazole sodium; Upper gastrointestinal bleeding
分类号:
R573.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.18.031
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较艾普拉唑钠和奥美拉唑钠治疗上消化道出血的治疗效果。方法 选取2021年5月-2022年5月永修县人民医院诊治的64例上消化道出血患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各32例。两组均给予阿莫西林胶囊，在此基础上，对照组采用注射用奥美拉唑钠，观察组采用注射用艾普拉唑钠，比较两组临床止血有效率、平均止血时间、出血量、再出血率、胃液pH值、血红蛋白水平、血细胞比容、不良反应发生率、治疗费用、住院时间。结果 观察组止血有效率为93.75%，与对照组的96.88%比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；观察组平均止血时间短于对照组，出血量少于对照组，再出血率低于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组胃液pH值、血红蛋白水平、血细胞比容高于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组不良反应发生率为9.38%，低于对照组的15.63%（P＜0.05）；观察组治疗费用高于对照组，住院时间短于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 在上消化道出血治疗中，艾普拉唑钠和奥美拉唑钠均可获得良好的止血效果，但与奥美拉唑钠比较，艾普拉唑钠可缩短止血时间和住院时间，减少出血量，降低胃液pH值，改善血红蛋白水平、血细胞比容，降低不良反应发生率，但其治疗成本相对较高。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of ilaprazole sodium and omeprazole sodium in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Methods A total of 64 patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding diagnosed and treated in Yongxiu County People’s Hospital from May 2021 to May 2022 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 32 patients in each group. Both groups were given amoxicillin capsules. On this basis, the control group was treated with omeprazole sodium for injection, and the observation group was treated with ilaprazole sodium for injection. The clinical hemostasis efficiency, average hemostasis time, bleeding volume, rebleeding rate, gastric juice pH value, hemoglobin level, hematocrit, incidence of adverse reactions, treatment cost and hospitalization time were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of hemostasis in the observation group was 93.75%, which was compared with 96.88% in the control group, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The average hemostasis time of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group, the amount of bleeding was less than that of the control group, and the rebleeding rate was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The pH value of gastric juice, hemoglobin level and hematocrit in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 9.38%, which was lower than 15.63% in the control group (P<0.05). The treatment cost of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the hospitalization time was shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion In the treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, both ilaprazole sodium and omeprazole sodium can achieve good hemostatic effect. However, compared with omeprazole sodium, ilaprazole sodium can shorten the hemostasis time and hospitalization time, reduce the amount of bleeding, reduce the pH value of gastric juice, improve hemoglobin level and hematocrit, and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, but its treatment cost is relatively high.

参考文献/References:

[1]何祖蕙,郝理华,杨辉.奥曲肽与奥美拉唑联合治疗儿童急性上消化道出血的疗效及安全性分析[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2019,24(6):656-658.[2]王春蓉,吴孟杰,李静.奥美拉唑联合血凝酶治疗胃溃疡伴上消化道出血[J].长春中医药大学学报,2022,38(6):683-686.[3]曾为驰.奥美拉唑联合奥曲肽治疗肝硬化上消化道出血的效果与安全性优势分析[J].吉林医学,2021,42(1):135-137.[4]严钞馨.奥美拉唑、兰索拉唑、艾司奥美拉唑治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的成本-效果比较[J].中国医药科学,2021,11(19):196-198,221.[5]丁度宇.艾普拉唑联合血凝酶治疗胃溃疡合并上消化道出血的疗效研究[J].黑龙江医药,2022,35(1):93-95.[6]Wang H,Lang L,Ou N,et al.Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Safety of Multiple-Infusion Ilaprazole in Healthy Chinese Subjects[J].Clin Drug Investig,2016,36(6):463-470.[7]郭雪梅.奥美拉唑与埃索美拉唑在胃溃疡治疗中的临床疗效比较[J].中国药物与临床,2018,18(7):1213-1214.[8]董少晨,周平.艾普拉唑与艾司奥美拉唑治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性十二指肠溃疡的成本-效果分析[J].北华大学学报（自然科学版）,2019,20(6):778-782.[9]古小阳,陈杰,文剑波.注射用艾普拉唑钠治疗消化性溃疡出血的临床效果分析[J].药品评价,2019,16(13):27-28,31.[10]唐娜娜,周海云,张红杰.艾普拉唑治疗糜烂性反流性食管炎的疗效[J].江苏医药,2016,42(20):2270-2272.[11]谢强,李远,徐惠萍.艾普拉唑肠溶片治疗十二指肠溃疡的有效性和安全性[J].医学理论与实践,2019,32(16):2566-2567.[12]陈梅梅,曾静,段晓燕,等.艾普拉唑肠溶片对老年消化性溃疡患者的治疗效果及对血管生长因子、炎性因子的影响[J].中国中西医结合消化杂志,2019,27(8):604-607,612.[13]张向平.泮托拉唑联合奥曲肽治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血疗效分析[J].中国药物与临床,2021,21(3):456-457.[14]Chiu PW.Endoscopic Management of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: Recent Advances[J].Clin Endosc,2019,52(5):416-418.[15]陈颖,鲁爽.消化性溃疡出血治疗药物临床试验设计和评价考虑要点[J].中国新药杂志,2020,29(14):1576-1582.[16]罗金键.泮托拉唑治疗消化性溃疡合并上消化道出血的临床观察[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2015,15(3):301-304.[17]Petrik P,Bra?觢i?觢kiene S,Petrik E.Characteristics and outcomes of gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding: a single-centre experience in Lithuania[J].Prz Gastroenterol,2017,12(4):277-285.[18]束颖.注射用艾普拉唑钠治疗消化性溃疡出血患者的临床疗效[J].现代诊断与治疗,2020,31(21):3413-3414.[19]季峰,吴国兰,周辛欣,等.注射用艾普拉唑钠和艾司奥美拉唑钠预防消化性溃疡再出血的有效性和安全性对照研究[J].中华消化杂志,2021,41(8):514-521.[20]古小阳.注射用艾普拉唑钠治疗消化性溃疡出血的临床效果分析[D].广州:南方医科大学,2019.

相似文献/References:

[1]周雯雯.法莫替丁与奥美拉唑钠治疗儿童消化性溃疡的效价[J].医学信息,2020,33(17):146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.17.042]
　ZHOU Wen-wen.The Potency of Famotidine and Omeprazole Sodium in the Treatment of Peptic Ulcer in Children[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(18):146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.17.042]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01