[1]缪永江.B超定位下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞在上肢骨折手术麻醉中的应用效果及安全性[J].医学信息,2023,36(24):83-86.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.24.017]
 MIAO Yong-jiang.Application Effect and Safety of Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block Under B-ultrasound Localization in Anesthesia of Upper Limb Fractures Surgery[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(24):83-86.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.24.017]
点击复制

B超定位下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞在上肢骨折手术麻醉中的应用效果及安全性()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2023年24期
页码:
83-86
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application Effect and Safety of Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block Under B-ultrasound Localization in Anesthesia of Upper Limb Fractures Surgery
文章编号:
1006-1959(2023)24-0083-04
作者:
缪永江
(萍乡市湘东区人民医院麻醉科,江西 萍乡 337016)
Author(s):
MIAO Yong-jiang
(Department of Anesthesiology,People’s Hospital of Xiangdong District,Pingxiang 337016,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
B超定位肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞上肢骨折
Keywords:
B-ultrasound localizationIntermuscular sulcus brachial plexus blockUpper limb fractures
分类号:
R614.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.24.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究B超定位下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞在上肢骨折手术麻醉中的应用效果及安全性。方法 选取2021年1月-2022年10月我院接诊的64例上肢骨折患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各32例。对照组采用传统臂丛神经阻滞麻醉,观察组采用B超定位下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞麻醉,比较两组麻醉效果、麻醉临床手术指标、尺动脉血流动力学指标、疼痛评分、不良反应发生率。结果 观察组麻醉优良率为93.75%,高于对照组的81.25%(P<0.05);观察组麻醉阻滞起效时间、麻醉完成时间短于对照组,麻醉持续时间长于对照组(P<0.05);观察组阻力指数、搏动指数均小于对照组,血流量大于对照组(P<0.05);观察组疼痛评分低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组不良反应发生率为6.25%,低于对照组的18.75%(P<0.05)。结论 在上肢骨科手术麻醉中采用B超定位下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞可提高麻醉效果,缩短麻醉阻滞、麻醉操作时间,延长麻醉持续时间,降低疼痛评分、不良反应发生率,且对尺动脉麻醉更完全,可改善外周血流量,是一种安全、有效的麻醉方式。
Abstract:
Objective To study the application effect and safety of interscalene brachial plexus block under B-ultrasound localization in anesthesia of upper limb fracture surgery.Methods From January 2021 to October 2022, 64 patients with upper limb fractures admitted to our hospital were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 32 patients in each group. The control group was treated with traditional brachial plexus block anesthesia, and the observation group was treated with intermuscular sulcus brachial plexus block anesthesia under B-ultrasound positioning. The anesthesia effect, anesthesia clinical operation index, ulnar artery hemodynamics index, pain score and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The excellent and good rate of anesthesia in the observation group was 93.75%, which was higher than 81.25% in the control group (P<0.05). The onset time of anesthesia block and completion time of anesthesia in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, and the duration of anesthesia was longer than that in the control group (P<0.05). The resistance index and pulsatility index of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the blood flow was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The pain score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 6.25%, which was lower than 18.75% in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Interscalene brachial plexus block under B-ultrasound localization can improve the anesthetic effect in upper limb orthopedic surgery, shorten the time of anesthesia block and anesthesia operation, prolong the duration of anesthesia, reduce the pain score and the incidence of adverse reactions, and the ulnar artery anesthesia is more complete, which can improve peripheral blood flow. It is a safe and effective anesthesia method.

参考文献/References:

[1]熊显良,黄咏梅,陈东,等.超声引导肌间沟径路与锁骨上径路臂丛神经阻滞的麻醉效果比较[J].实用医院临床杂志,2016,13(2):105-107,114.[2]王利平,喻红彪,苏明萍.超声引导下喙突旁入路与肌间沟入路臂丛神经阻滞的效果比较分析[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2019,16(6):132-134.[3]余昌伟,陈金保.超声引导下肌间沟联合锁骨上入路臂丛神经阻滞在老年上肢手术患者中的应用效果[J].安徽医学,2018,39(2):182-185.[4]李蒙,陈晓晖,张建英.超声可视下肌间沟联合腋路臂丛神经阻滞的麻醉效果优势分析[J].吉林医学,2016,37(10):2512-2513.[5]王瑞国.超声引导下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞复合全麻对肩袖损伤手术患者的应用效果[J].河南医学研究,2021,30(33):6245-6247.[6]徐诚实,郑媛芳,张文超,等.超声和神经刺激器引导下双侧腋路臂丛神经阻滞的临床对比观察[J].中日友好医院学报,2018,32(1):11-14.[7]谢淑华,丁玲,魏颖,等.超声引导下臂丛与颈深丛联合神经阻滞在肩关节镜手术中的应用[J].天津医药,2018,46(7):751-754.[8]申治国,张永年,聂志伟,等.超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞入路的选择[J].山西医药杂志,2018,47(22):2713-2715.[9]王小刚.臂丛神经阻滞复合喉罩全身麻醉在骨科上肢手术中的应用[J].山西医药杂志,2019,48(17):2149-2152.[10]李静,赵玲,韩彬,等.超声引导下肋锁间隙和喙突入路锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞在前臂或手部术中效果的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2018,34(4):341-344.[11]王维明,郑春涛.超声引导臂丛神经阻滞麻醉在上肢骨折固定术后镇痛中应用[J].贵州医药,2018,42(6):721-723.[12]韩文冬.不同浓度罗哌卡因用于超声引导下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞的麻醉效果分析[J].中国实验诊断学,2017,21(11):1970-1972.[13]王琳琳,张雷,陈恩琪,等.超声引导下不同剂量罗哌卡因肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞的效果对比分析[J].医学研究杂志,2017,46(4):93-95,99.[14]孙大健,张洁.右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因用于超声引导下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞的麻醉效果观察[J].海南医学,2019,30(5):607-609.[15]陈鹏,王小明,李方宽,等.右美托咪定联合臂丛神经阻滞麻醉用于老年高血压骨科手术的观察[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2019,40(5):571-573.[16]殷琴琴,许强,陈有园,等.两种容量罗哌卡因用于超声引导下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞对膈肌麻痹的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2019,35(12):1170-1173.[17]李勇.超声引导下布比卡因与罗哌卡因对腋路臂丛神经阻滞患者麻醉效果及并发症的影响[J].成都医学院学报,2018,13(3):310-313.[18]黄永军,范华荣,王振元.超声引导定位在肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞麻醉中的作用及安全性观察[J].中国医刊,2019,54(7):794-797.[19]叶姣,薛荣亮.不同浓度和剂量盐酸罗哌卡因对超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞效果的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,48(1):55-57.[20]姚喜红,陈建平,文广,等.上肢骨折桡侧术后经静脉与经肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞镇痛效果的比较[J].上海医学,2019,42(10):621-622.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐国林,李 锐,张 野.基于肺电阻抗成像评价肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞对肺通气的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(02):69.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.02.014]
 XU Guo-lin,LI Rui,ZHANG Ye.Effect of Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block on Pulmonary Ventilation Based on Pulmonary Electrical Impedance Tomography[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(24):69.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.02.014]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01