[1]那艳宇.以危险因素评估为指导的预见性护理对上消化道出血患者止血时间、并发症及出血次数的影响[J].医学信息,2024,37(04):160-163.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.04.031]
　NA Yan-yu.Effect of Predictive Nursing Guided by Risk Factor Assessment on Hemostasis Time,Complications and Bleeding Times in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(04):160-163.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.04.031]
点击复制

以危险因素评估为指导的预见性护理对上消化道出血患者止血时间、并发症及出血次数的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年04期
页码:
160-163
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2024-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Predictive Nursing Guided by Risk Factor Assessment on Hemostasis Time,Complications and Bleeding Times in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
文章编号:
1006-1959（2024）04-0160-04
作者:
那艳宇
（天津市第二人民医院ICU，天津 300192）
Author(s):
NA Yan-yu
(ICU of Tianjin Second People’s Hospital,Tianjin 300192,China)
关键词:
危险评估; 预见性护理; 上消化道出血
Keywords:
Risk assessment; Predictive nursing; Upper gastrointestinal bleeding
分类号:
R473.5
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.04.031
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究在上消化道出血患者护理中应用以危险因素评估为指导的预见性护理，对止血时间、并发症及出血次数的影响。方法 选取2020年3月-2021年3月在我院诊治的74例上消化道出血患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各37例。对照组采用常规护理，观察组在对照组基础上给予以危险因素评估为指导的预见性护理干预，比较两组止血时间、出血次数、住院时间、并发症发生率、应激指标、生活质量水平以及护理满意度。结果 观察组止血时间、出血次数、住院时间均小于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组并发症发生率为5.41%，低于对照组的16.22%（P＜0.05）；两组护理后肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素、血浆皮质醇水平均低于护理前，且观察组低于对照组（P＜0.05）；两组护理后生活质量评分均高于护理前，且观察组大于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组护理满意度为94.59%，高于对照组的86.49%（P＜0.05）。结论 以危险因素评估为指导的预见性护理干预应用于上消化道出血患者中，可缩短止血时间，减少出血次数，降低并发症发生率，提高护理满意度，减小应激反应，促进患者生活质量水平的改善，具有确切的应用护理效果。
Abstract:
Objective To study the effect of predictive nursing guided by risk factor assessment on hemostasis time, complications and bleeding times in the nursing of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods A total of 74 patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding diagnosed and treated in our hospital from March 2020 to March 2021 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 37 patients in each group. The control group was given routine nursing, and the observation group was given predictive nursing intervention guided by risk factor assessment on the basis of the control group. The hemostasis time, bleeding frequency, hospitalization time, complication rate, stress index, quality of life and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The hemostasis time, bleeding times and hospitalization time of the observation group were less than those of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 5.41%, which was lower than 16.22% in the control group (P<0.05). After nursing, the levels of adrenaline, norepinephrine and plasma cortisol in the two groups were lower than those before nursing, and those in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The quality of life scores of the two groups after nursing were higher than those before nursing, and the observation group was higher than the control group (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 94.59%, which was higher than 86.49% of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of predictive nursing intervention guided by risk factor assessment in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding can shorten the hemostasis time, reduce the number of bleeding, reduce the incidence of complications, improve nursing satisfaction, reduce stress response, and promote the improvement of patients’ quality of life. It has a definite application nursing effect.

参考文献/References:

[1]李辰飞,刘高虹,渠风琴,等.上消化道出血患者急性肾损伤发病和死亡的危险因素探讨[J].中国中西医结合肾病杂志,2019,20(3):219-223.[2]李心群,洪广亮,林碎钗,等.危险性上消化道出血救治模式重塑及效果评价[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2020,29(4):585-588.[3]张朝辉,严晶晶.危险性上消化道出血多学科协作诊疗模式与传统会诊模式临床疗效的对照研究[J].中华危重病急救医学,2020,32(9):1107-1110.[4]白托娅.上消化道出血病例回顾性分析及NSAIDs相关性上消化道出血临床特点探讨[J].大连医科大学,2021,5(1):58-60.[5]徐红菊,滕敬华,范彩仙.上消化道出血急救中应用循证护理和预见性护理的效果观察[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2016,21(3):490-492.[6]韦素雨.预见性护理干预对上消化道出血患者负性情绪及治疗护理效果的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2016,35(7):910-912.[7]汤丽丽,杨文梓,孙亮.预见性护理干预对脑出血重症监护患者相关护理结局的影响研究[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2018,1(4):445-447[8]张家超,薛国平,叶纪纲.粪便中血红蛋白和转铁蛋白联合检测在消化道出血诊断中的应用价值[J].实验与检验医学,2017,15(4):129-130.[9]崔利军,于永强,高会斌.上消化道出血患者应用内镜检查在诊断与治疗中的价值[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2016,18(4):79-81.[10]刘峰,袁波,苏巧俐,等.成人消化道出血合并恶性肿瘤患者出血病因分析[J].浙江医学,2016,30(6):139-141.[11]冯静云.肝硬化上消化道出血临床特征、出血危险因素及其预后因素研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2017.[12]赵婷.急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者再出血危险性及其临床分级的护理干预效果研究[J].护士进修杂志,2018,33(14):1270-1273.[13]贾占花,曹洪涛,任蕾.中西医结合配合循证护理干预对上消化道出血的效果观察[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2018,24(10) :1441-1443.[14]薛挺,胡锋.Glasgow-Blatchford评分与全Rockall评分系统预测上消化道出血临床结局的对比研究[J].天津医药,2018,46(2):182-186. [15]刘晓菊.预见性护理模式对高龄上消化道出血患者舒适度、并发症及护理满意度的影响[J].河北医药,2018,40(8):144-147.[16]常永霞,李明蕊.多学科协作护理对肝硬化上消化道出血患者自我效能及生活质量的影响[J].河南医学研究,2021,30(3):550-552.[17]徐升,徐芳,应丽园,等.肝硬化合并上消化道出血患者医院感染的病原学特点及影响因素研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2019,29(1):71-74.[18]万敏.上消化道出血患者行预见性护理与出院强化健康教育价值研究[J].基层医学论坛,2017,21(30):4207-4208.[19]谢芸.Rockall评分指导治疗急性上消化道出血对患者预后影响[J].牡丹江医学院学报,2016,37(3):19-21.

相似文献/References:

[1]施香兰.预见性护理模式在胃肠镜检查风险控制中的应用[J].医学信息,2022,35(14):190.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.14.050]
　SHI Xiang-lan.Application of Predictive Nursing Model in Risk Control of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(04):190.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.14.050]
[2]王世芳.预见性护理对肾病综合征患者并发症发生率及护理满意度的影响[J].医学信息,2020,33(01):188.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.01.063]
　WANG Shi-fang.Effect of Predictive Nursing on the Incidence of Complications and Nursing Satisfaction in Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(04):188.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.01.063]
[3]吴 双,黄淑娟.Orem自理模式联合预见性护理对降低阴道分娩产后出血量及改善妊娠结局的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(19):160.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.19.036]
　WU Shuang,HUANG Shu-juan.Effect of Orem Self-care Mode Combined with Predictive Nursing on Reducing Postpartum Hemorrhage and Improving Pregnancy Outcome in Vaginal Delivery[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(04):160.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.19.036]
[4]张会元.基于Triangle分层管理的预见性护理对ICU重症患者护理效果及质量的影响[J].医学信息,2020,33(11):179.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.11.059]
　ZHANG Hui-yuan.The Effect of Predictive Nursing Based on Triangle Hierarchical Management on the Nursing Effect and Quality of ICU Critical Patients[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(04):179.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.11.059]
[5]丁海蛟,刘梦焦.预见性护理干预对脑出血重症监护患者相关护理结局的影响[J].医学信息,2021,34(08):183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.08.051]
　DING Hai-jiao,LIU Meng-jiao.The Influence of Predictive Nursing Intervention on Related Nursing Outcomes of Patients with Cerebral Hemorrhage in Intensive Care[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(04):183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.08.051]
[6]吕雪飞.预见性护理在肝胆管结石手术患者护理中的应用效果[J].医学信息,2021,34(09):185.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.09.051]
　LYU Xue-fei.Application Effect of Predictive Nursing in the Nursing of Patients Undergoing Hepatolithiasis Surgery[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(04):185.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.09.051]
[7]刘 宁.围术期预见性护理对全髋关节置换术患者术后关节脱位的预防效果观察[J].医学信息,2022,35(04):190.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.04.052]
　LIU Ning.Preventive Effect of Perioperative Predictive Nursing on Postoperative Joint Dislocationin Patients with Total Hip Arthroplasty[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(04):190.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.04.052]
[8]钟 晶.围术期预见性护理对全髋关节置换术患者术后患肢功能恢复及关节脱位的预防效果[J].医学信息,2023,36(22):167.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.22.039]
　ZHONG Jing.Preventive Effect of Perioperative Predictive Nursing on Postoperative Limb Function Recovery and Joint Dislocation in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(04):167.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.22.039]
[9]耿倩倩.预见性护理在不稳定型心绞痛患者中的应用效果[J].医学信息,2023,36(22):175.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.22.041]
　GENG Qian-qian.Application Effect of Predictive Nursing in Patients with Unstable Angina Pectoris[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(04):175.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.22.041]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01