[1]康连风,曹春风,宋金妹.胎盘粘连的风险因素分析及临床治疗方案研究[J].医学信息,2024,37(19):114-117,121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.19.022]
　KANG Lianfeng,CAO Chunfeng,SONG Jinmei.Analysis of Risk Factors and Clinical Treatment of Placental Adhesions[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(19):114-117,121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.19.022]
点击复制

胎盘粘连的风险因素分析及临床治疗方案研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年19期
页码:
114-117,121
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2024-10-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of Risk Factors and Clinical Treatment of Placental Adhesions
文章编号:
1006-1959（2024）19-0114-05
作者:
康连风; 曹春风; 宋金妹
信丰县人民医院产科，江西 信丰 341600
Author(s):
KANG Lianfeng; CAO Chunfeng; SONG Jinmei
Obstetrics Department of Xinfeng County People’s Hospital,Xinfeng 341600,Jiangxi,China
关键词:
胎盘粘连; 危险因素; 预测模型; 胎盘厚度; 缩宫素; 胎盘自然剥离
Keywords:
Placental adhesion; Risk factors; Prediction model; Placental thickness; Oxytocin; Natural placental detachment
分类号:
R714
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.19.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究胎盘粘连的危险因素及理想治疗方案。方法 以2022年5月-2023年11月信丰县人民医院经阴道分娩的100例产妇为研究对象，依据其胎盘粘连发生情况分为胎盘粘连组与未发生胎盘粘连组，收集两组基本信息及病理检查结果，分析胎盘粘连的危险因素，构建相关列线图预测模型，并予以验证。采用随机数字表法，将胎盘粘连组患者分为A组与B组，A组给予缩宫素脐静脉注射，B组行马来酸麦角新碱肌内注射，比较两组治疗效果。结果 胎盘粘连组产妇共38例，未发生胎盘粘连组62例；两组年龄、妊娠合并症、产次、剖宫产史、流产史、胎盘厚度、胎盘长度、胎盘宽度比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。多因素Logistic分析显示，年龄、剖宫产史、流产史、胎盘厚度、胎盘长度、胎盘宽度均是影响胎盘粘连发生的独立危险因素（P＜0.05）。依据上述危险因素建立胎盘粘连的列线图预测模型，经ROC曲线验证，该模型区分度AUC=0.807（95%CI：0.752~0.843），且校准曲线显示校准曲线斜率接近1，模型预测效果良好。胎盘粘连组经治疗后，A组胎盘自然剥离率高于B组，手取胎盘率低于B组（P＜0.05）。结论 产妇年龄、剖宫产史、流产史与胎盘厚度、长度、宽度是导致胎盘粘连发生的危险因素，基于以上因素构建的列线图预测模型具有较好的预测效能，经脐静脉注射缩宫素在该病治疗中具有良好的临床效果。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the risk factors and ideal treatment of placental adhesion.Methods From May 2022 to November 2023,100 parturients who underwent vaginal delivery in Xinfeng County People’s Hospital were selected as the research objects. According to the occurrence of placental adhesion, they were divided into placental adhesion group and non-placental adhesion group. The basic information and pathological examination results of the two groups were collected, the risk factors of placental adhesion were analyzed, and the relevant nomogram prediction model was constructed and verified. The patients in the placental adhesion group were divided into group A and group B by random number table method. Group A was given oxytocin umbilical vein injection, and group B was given ergometrine maleate intramuscular injection. The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared.Results There were 38 cases in the placental adhesion group and 62 cases in the non-placental adhesion group. There were significant differences in age, pregnancy complications, parity, cesarean section history, abortion history, placental thickness, placental length and placental width between the two groups(P<0.05). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that age, history of cesarean section, history of abortion, placental thickness, placental length and placental width were independent risk factors for placental adhesion P<0.05). According to the above risk factors, a nomogram prediction model of placental adhesion was established. The ROC curve showed that the model discrimination AUC=0.807 (95%CI: 0.752-0.843), and the calibration curve showed that the slope of the calibration curve was close to 1, and the model prediction effect was good. After treatment, the natural placental detachment rate in group A was higher than that in group B, and the rate of taking placenta by hand was lower than that in group B (P<0.05).Conclusion Maternal age, history of cesarean section, history of abortion and placental thickness, length and width are risk factors for placental adhesion. The nomogram prediction model based on the above factors has good predictive efficacy. Intravenous injection of oxytocin through umbilical vein has a good clinical effect in the treatment of this disease.

参考文献/References:

[1]王乐乐,栗宝华.中央性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入产后大出血的相关因素分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2023,24(4):379-383.[2]侯靓思,张恂,王玉珏,等.胎盘植入产妇子宫切除的影响因素分析[J].重庆医科大学学报,2023,48(1):66-70.[3]杨启兵,李文刚.产前超声征象评分诊断前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的临床效果[J].贵州医药,2023,47(9):1455-1456.[4]涂业秀,李燕燕,苏艳洁,等.孕中期肌酸激酶、血管内皮生长因子与瘢痕子宫孕妇发生胎盘植入性疾病的关系及对胎盘植入程度的预测研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2023,22(15):1639-1642.[5]刘小晖,李莲英,刘小玲,等.凶险性前置胎盘宫颈部胎盘植入患者临床妊娠结局研究[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2023,24(2):184-186.[6]黄娟娟,林嘉欣,叶伟,等.胎盘植入性疾病发生大量产后出血的高危因素分析[J].重庆医学,2022,51(24):4224-4229,4235.[7]尹智敏,吕燕,穆娟,等.中期妊娠引产患者发生胎盘滞留的危险因素[J].山东医药,2022,62(36):50-53.[8]赵建林,石海君,罗欣,等.不同位置胎盘发生胎盘植入产前诊断情况及围产结局分析[J].重庆医科大学学报,2022,47(12):1394-1399. [9]孙佳,宋学薇,刘亚梅,等.胎盘粘连、胎盘植入患者外周血MMP-9、TGF-β1及sFlt-1水平观察[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2022,21(14):1548-1552.[10]刘玮玮,王红,姚建,等.MRI与超声检查在粘连性胎盘植入诊断价值中的对比研究[J].医学影像学杂志,2023,33(8):1510-1513.[11]黄静,邹翰琴.胎盘植入因素分析及不同程度胎盘植入的超声影像表现[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2021,29(9):1898-1901.[12]刘小渝,杨敏,雷蜀娥,等.胎盘植入危险因素分析及产前彩色多普勒超声联合MRI的诊断价值[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2021,19(10):133-136.[13]梁菲,王瑜,武海英.凶险性前置胎盘并胎盘植入危险因素及不同影像学方式诊断价值探究[J].现代妇产科进展,2021,30(4):294-298.[14]徐婧,刘延,丁晓毅,等.胎盘植入的高危因素及球囊预置阻断技术在预防胎盘植入产后出血中的临床价值[J].现代妇产科进展,2020,29(1):22-25.[15]钟伟珍,严敏莉,唐坚.胎盘植入高危因素分析及预测模型构建[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2021,29(8):1601-1605.[16]王军,徐娟,程义玲.胎盘粘连对经阴道分娩产后出血的影响及相关因素分析[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2019,16(6):150-152.[17]谭丽姝,黄燕.胎盘植入性疾病危险因素的决策树预测模型的建立[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2023,54(2):400-405.[18]谢平,金晓倩,张乾泉,等.3D-PDU胎盘及子宫动脉血流动力学参数与胎盘植入的相关性分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2023,33(17):76-83.[19]周春桥,黎新艳,丁莹,等.基于超声征象构建侵袭性胎盘植入风险预测模型[J].中国超声医学杂志,2023,39(9):1030-1033.[20]李翠梅,高艳娥,郑新艳.产后胎盘粘连应用两种不同干预措施的比较[J].中国药物与临床,2021,21(17):2974-2976.[21]龚晓岩.缩宫素联合卡前列氨丁三醇针治疗剖宫产术中术后出血的临床疗效观察[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(21):3770-3771.[22]冯彩丽.马来酸麦角新碱联合缩宫素治疗宫缩乏力性产后出血的临床疗效分析[J].山西医药杂志,2020,49(22):3083-3085.

相似文献/References:

[1]廖加群,曹 雪,陈燕平,等.宫颈癌盆腔淋巴结转移分布及危险因素分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(03):25.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.008]
　LIAO Jia-qun,CAO Xue,CHEN Yan-ping,et al.Distribution and Risk Factors of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Cervical Cancer[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):25.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.008]
[2]梁 钢.造影剂肾病的诊治进展[J].医学信息,2018,31(04):45.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.015]
　LIANG Gang.Progress in Diagnosis and Treatment of Contrast Nephropathy[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):45.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.015]
[3]翟公伟,赵培华,滑 艳.30岁以下急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者临床特点分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.026]
　ZHAI Gong-wei,ZHAO Pei-hua,HUA Yan.Clinical Characteristics of Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction under 30 Years of Age[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.026]
[4]孙 志,邢效如,揣兰香,等.青年脑出血患者的临床特点及发病危险因素分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(06):80.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.06.025]
　SUN Zhi,XING Xiao-ru,CHUAI Lan-xiang,et al.Analysis of Clinical Features and Risk Factors of Cerebral Hemorrhage in Youth[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):80.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.06.025]
[5]向明明,赵晓辉.黑龙江省东部地区汉族人群冠心病的危险因素研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(07):122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.041]
　XIANG Ming-ming,ZHAO Xiao-hui.Study on Risk Factors of Coronary Heart Disease in Han Nationality Population in Eastern Heilongjiang Province[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):122.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.041]
[6]单菲菲,陈 琴,吕建国,等.体力活动与子宫内膜癌关系的病例对照研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(10):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.019]
　SHAN Fei-fei,CHEN Qin,LV Jian-guo,et al.Case Control Study on the Relationship between Physical Activity and Endometrial Carcinoma[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.019]
[7]韩 倩,刘 兴.脑小血管病诊疗进展[J].医学信息,2018,31(11):52.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.11.017]
　HAN Qian,LIU Xing.Progress in Diagnosis and Treatment of Small Cerebral Vascular Disease[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):52.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.11.017]
[8]俞 瑞,吴建荣,杨晓萍,等.健康体检者中高尿酸人群血脂水平变化及 甘油三脂升高的相关因素分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(13):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.13.018]
　YU Rui,WU Jian-rong,YANG Xiao-ping,et al.Analysis of Related Factors of Blood Lipid Levels and Elevated Triglycerides in Hyperuricemia Population in Healthy Subjects[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.13.018]
[9]谢凌燕.汉川市第二人民医院工作人员职业暴露危险因素分析 及防护措施[J].医学信息,2018,31(15):173.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.15.058]
　XIE Ling-yan.Analysis of Occupational Exposure Risk Factors and Protective Measures for Staff of the Second People's Hospital of Hanchuan City[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):173.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.15.058]
[10]谢世宇,程贤高,丁 丹.PICU危重患儿预后危险因素分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(22):107.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.22.029]
　XIE Shi-yu,CHENG Xian-gao,DING Dan.Analysis of Prognostic Risk Factors in Critically Ill Children with PICU[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(19):107.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.22.029]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01