[1]王 欣,马文泽,陈军明.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与空心螺钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的早期疗效与术后并发症观察[J].医学信息,2024,37(21):78-81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.21.017]
　WANG Xin,MA Wenze,CHEN Junming.Observation of Early Efficacy and Postoperative Complications of Femoral Neck System and Cannulated Compression Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(21):78-81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.21.017]
点击复制

股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与空心螺钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的早期疗效与术后并发症观察()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年21期
页码:
78-81
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2024-11-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Observation of Early Efficacy and Postoperative Complications of Femoral Neck System and Cannulated Compression Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture
文章编号:
1006-1959（2024）21-0078-04
作者:
王 欣; 马文泽; 陈军明
天津港口医院骨科，天津 300456
Author(s):
WANG Xin; MA Wenze; CHEN Junming
Orthopaedics Department of Tianjin Port Hospital,Tianjin 300456,China
关键词:
股骨颈骨折; 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统; 空心螺钉内固定
Keywords:
Femoral neck fracture; Femoral neck system; Cannulated compression screws
分类号:
R683.42
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.21.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究股骨颈动力交叉钉系统（FNS）与空心螺钉内固定（CSS）治疗股骨颈骨折（FNF）的早期疗效及术后并发症情况。方法 选取2020年3月-2023年3月天津港口医院骨科收治的100例FNF患者，行随机数字表法分为FNS组与CSS组，各50例。FNS组采用股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗，CSS组采用空心螺钉内固定治疗，比较两组早期疗效、手术指标（切口长度、术中出血量、术中透视次数、手术时间）、术后恢复情况（复位质量、术后住院时间）、术后并发症。结果 FNS组与CSS组优良率、复位质量比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；FNS组术中透视次数少于CSS组，手术时间、术后住院时间短于CSS组（P＜0.05）；FNS组术后并发症发生率为2.00%，低于CSS组的12.00%（P＜0.05）。结论 FNS与CSS在FNF患者中具有确切治疗作用，二者早期疗效相当，但FNS具有术中透视次数更少、手术时间及术后住院时间更短，术后并发症发生更低的优势。
Abstract:
Objective To study the early efficacy and postoperative complications of femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated compression screws (CSS) in the treatment of femoral neck fracture (FNF).Methods A total of 100 patients with FNF admitted to the Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin Port Hospital from March 2020 to March 2023 were selected and divided into FNS group and CSS group by random number table method, with 50 patients in each group. The FNS group was treated with femoral neck system, and the CSS group was treated with cannulated compression screws. The early efficacy, surgical indicators (incision length, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, operation time), postoperative recovery (reduction quality, postoperative hospital stay), postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate and reduction quality between FNS group and CSS group (P>0.05). The number of intraoperative fluoroscopy in the FNS group was less than that in the CSS group, and the operation time and postoperative hospital stay were shorter than those in the CSS group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the FNS group was 2.00%, which was lower than 12.00% in the CSS group (P<0.05).Conclusion FNS and CSS have a definite therapeutic effect in patients with FNF, and the early efficacy of the two is equivalent. However, FNS has the advantages of fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy times, shorter operation time and postoperative hospital stay, and lower postoperative complications.

参考文献/References:

[1]梁辉,王逸康.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与空心钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2023,38(4):384-386.[2]段霄,张智勇,陈宗文,等.空心钉与股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗PauwelsⅡ～Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].局解手术学杂志,2023,32(4):340-345.[3]何嘉尧,舒涛,马季,等.动力髋联合空心钉与动力髋联合内侧板治疗PauwelsⅢ型股骨颈骨折的有限元分析比较[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2022,19(3):7-12.[4]杨杰,翁润民,雷广宇,等.动力髋螺钉联合股方肌蒂骨瓣移植治疗65岁以下股骨颈骨折[J].中国临床研究,2018,31(10):1342-1346.[5]许翔宇,周方,田耘,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与动力髋螺钉固定治疗股骨颈骨折的早期疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2021,23(9):754-760.[6]翁友林,李祖涛,蔡昱,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统和空心钉治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折近期疗效[J].实用医学杂志,2022,38(23):2962-2967.[7]梁跃闯,李艳军,于鹤童,等.正三角构型、倒三角构型空心螺钉内固定及股骨颈动力交叉钉系统固定治疗股骨颈骨折的有效性分析[J].创伤外科杂志,2022,24(9):659-664.[8]姬帅,马腾,王谦,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统固定Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折头钉不同置入位置的有限元分析[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2023,12(03):210-215.[9]Reid AWN,Sood MK.Intramedullary Cannulated Compression Screws for Extra-Articular Phalangeal Fractures[J].J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol,2021,26(2):180-187.[10]葛双雷,王雪飞,胡国东,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗中青年PauwelsⅡ型股骨颈骨折临床价值[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2022,11(4):255-260.[11]黄小东,陶岳峰,朱炳斌,等.三枚空心钉与动力交叉钉系统固定治疗股骨颈骨折的临床疗效对比[J].中国医刊,2023,58(2):179-182.[12]赵耀,程文丹,许新忠,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统和空心加压螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折近期疗效分析[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2022,19(2):67-72.[13]杨亚军,马涛,张小钰,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗股骨颈骨折近期疗效[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2021,35(5):539-543.[14]严才平,王星宽,向超,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与空心加压螺钉治疗中青年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2021,35(10):1286-1292.[15]何昌军,马腾,任程,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与空心螺钉治疗中青年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤杂志,2022,38(3):253-259.[16]熊巍,易敏,龙成,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与倒三角形空心螺钉固定治疗成人股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2021,23(9):748-753.[17]汪天豪,梁晓龙,郑恺,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与空心加压螺钉治疗老年股骨颈骨折短期随访的对比[J].中国组织工程研究,2023,27(36):5828-5833.[18]张红岗.不同术式治疗PauwelsⅢ型股骨颈骨折患者近期预后比较[J].中国药物与临床,2020,20(11):1851-1853.[19]钟杰林,蔡迎,金成浩,等.不同治疗方法对移位型股骨颈骨折髋关节功能及相关细胞因子的影响[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2019,25(6):982-986.[20]洪潇,罗鸿,杨若男.动力髋螺钉加防旋螺钉及股骨颈系统内固定治疗GardenⅡ-Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折的比较[J].中国组织工程研究,2023,27(4):583-587.[21]刘智芳,周方,田耘,等.动力髋螺钉与空心加压螺钉治疗新鲜股骨颈骨折的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2018,18(9):774-778.[22]Sivro M,Lazovic F,Omerovic D,et al.The effects of two fixation methods on blood loss in patients with trochanteric fracture: dynamic hip screw vs. proximal femoral nail anti-rotation[J].Med Glas (Zenica),2023,20(2):249-254.[23]陈城,汪建军,袁维诚.两种方法治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2023,26(2):238-242.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨书娇.早期康复护理对股骨颈骨折患者全髋关节置换术后功能恢复的影响[J].医学信息,2018,31(22):184.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.22.056]
　YANG Shu-jiao.Effect of Early Rehabilitation Nursing on Functional Recovery after Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(21):184.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.22.056]
[2]王添兴,李国庆,汪 洋,等.空心加压螺钉与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折术后股骨头坏死相关并发症的Meta分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(02):83.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.02.024]
　WANG Tian-xing,LI Guo-qing,WANG Yang,et al.Meta-analysis of Complications Associated with Hollow Compression Screws and Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Head Necrosis after Femoral Neck Fracture[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(21):83.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.02.024]
[3]吴 严,李海波,苟永胜.股骨颈骨折后股骨头坏死的相关因素分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(07):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.034]
　WU Yan,LI Hai-bo,GOU Yong-sheng.Analysis of Related Factors of Femoral Head Necrosis After Femoral Neck Fracture[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(21):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.034]
[4]龙 雨.股骨颈骨折的内固定手术治疗研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(15):42.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.15.014]
　LONG Yu.Research on Internal Fixation Surgery for Femoral Neck Fracture[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(21):42.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.15.014]
[5]刘冠虹,吉万波,刘锦涛,等.股密葆干预治疗肾虚血瘀型股骨颈骨折的疗效[J].医学信息,2019,32(18):63.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.18.020]
　LIU Guan-hong,JI Wan-bo,LIU Jin-tao,et al.Therapeutic Effect of Femoral Hernia on the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture with Kidney Deficiency and Blood Stasis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(21):63.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.18.020]
[6]张 彬,湛梅圣,冯硝刚,等.空心钉联合内侧支撑钢板固定治疗青壮年GardenⅢ、Ⅳ型 股骨颈骨折的疗效[J].医学信息,2019,32(12):176.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.060]
　ZHANG Bin,ZHAN Mei-sheng,FENG Xiao-gang,et al.Treatment of Garden III and IV Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Adults with Cannulated Screws Combined with Medial Support Plate Fixation[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(21):176.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.060]
[7]杨建水.直接前侧入路空心钉联合钢板治疗GardenⅣ型股骨颈骨折的疗效[J].医学信息,2020,33(06):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.06.034]
　YANG Jian-shui.Curative Effect of Direct Anterior Approach Hollow Nail Combined with Steel Plate on Garden IV Femoral Neck Fractures[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(21):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.06.034]
[8]贺延雷,李 强,李国良.“F”形空心钉与空心螺钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折对比观察[J].医学信息,2020,33(08):113.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.08.035]
　HE Yan-lei,LI Qiang,LI Guo-liang.Comparison of the Effect of"F"Shaped Hollow nail and Hollow Screw Internal Fixation on Femoral Neck Fracture[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(21):113.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.08.035]
[9]刘希伦.内固定术与人工髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的现状[J].医学信息,2020,33(14):51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.14.016]
　LIU Xi-lun.Current Status of Internal Fixation and Artificial Hip Replacement for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(21):51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.14.016]
[10]张旭坤,王胜利,葛站勇.前外侧入路下不同髋关节置换方式治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].医学信息,2020,33(22):120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.22.034]
　ZHANG Xu-kun,WANG Sheng-li,GE Zhan-yong.Comparison of Curative Effect Different Hip Replacement Methods in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly Through Anterolateral Approach[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(21):120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.22.034]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01