[1]陈春香,顾宇丹.循证护理干预对高血压脑出血与患者心理状态恢复及 并发症的影响[J].医学信息,2018,31(14):180-182.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.057]
　CHEN Chun-xiang,GU Yu-dan.Effect of Evidence-based Nursing Intervention on Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage and Recovery of Patients' Psychological State and Complications[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(14):180-182.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.057]
点击复制

循证护理干预对高血压脑出血与患者心理状态恢复及 并发症的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2018年14期
页码:
180-182
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2018-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Evidence-based Nursing Intervention on Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage and Recovery of Patients' Psychological State and Complications
文章编号:
1006-1959（2018）14-0180-03
作者:
陈春香; 顾宇丹
南通大学附属医院神经外科，江苏 南通 226000
Author(s):
CHEN Chun-xiang; GU Yu-dan
Department of Neurosurgery,Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University,Nantong 226000,Jiangsu,China
关键词:
循证护理干预; 高血压脑出血; 心理状态; 并发症
Keywords:
Key words：Evidence-based nursing intervention; Hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage; Psychological state; Complications
分类号:
R473.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.057
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究与分析循证护理干预对高血压脑出血与患者心理状态恢复及并发症的影响。方法 选取我院自2015年5月~2017年5月收治的80例高血压脑出血患者，全部患者均接受了微创颅内血肿清除术治疗，采取随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组，每组40例。对照组给予常规护理，观察组在对照组基础上给予循证护理干预，对比两组患者心理状态情况及并发症发生率。结果 对照组护理后SAS及SDS评分分别为（52.76±5.51）分、（53.40±5.35）分，观察组护理后SAS及SDS评分分别为（45.87±5.20）分、（46.49±5.34）分，两组患者护理后与护理前相比，SAS、SDS评分均降低，且观察组低于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。观察组并发症发生率为7.50%，低于对照组的20.00%，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 将循证护理干预应用于高血压脑出血患者中能够明显缓解患者的焦虑抑郁症状，促进改善患者的生活质量，降低并发症发生率，提升临床护理的安全性。
Abstract:
Abstract：Objective To explore and analyze the effects of evidence-based nursing intervention on hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage and psychological recovery and complications.Methods 80 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage admitted to our hospital from May 2015 to May 2017 were enrolled.All patients underwent minimally invasive intracranial hematoma evacuation.They were randomly divided into control group and observation group.40 cases per group.The control group received routine nursing care, and the observation group received evidence-based nursing intervention on the basis of the control group.The psychological status and complication rate of the two groups were compared.Results The SAS and SDS scores of the control group were(52.76±5.51)points and (53.40±5.35)points respectively.The SAS and SDS scores of the observation group were(45.87±5.20)points and(46.49±5.34)points respectively.The scores of SAS and SDS of the two groups were lower than those before nursing,and the observation group was lower than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was 7.50%,lower than that in the control group 20.00%,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of evidence-based nursing intervention to patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage can obviously relieve the symptoms of anxiety and depression,improve the quality of life of the patients,reduce the incidence of complications and improve the safety of clinical nursing.

参考文献/References:

[1]杨景娜.综合护理对高血压脑出血微创术患者的应用体会[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2014,17(13):138-139. [2]叶惠娟.综合护理干预对高血压脑出血患者神经功能与生活质量的影响[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2014,17(15):48-49. [3]范红,刘旭,郑仲乾,等.微创术治疗高血压脑出血综合护理干预效果分析[J].护士进修杂志,2012,27(18):1681-1682. [4]高晓琴.综合性护理干预对原发性高血压患者治疗依从性及生活质量的影响[J].内科,2013,8(6):670-671. [5]朱素琴,陈松芳.综合性心理护理干预对高血压脑出血患者治疗遵医行为、并发症、护理满意度和预后的影响[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(6):108-110. [6]林绯.护理干预对高血压性脑出血患者治疗依从性的影响[J].中风与神经疾病杂志,2013,17(6):534-535.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘伟兰,罗丽珍.围手术护理干预在高血压脑出血小骨窗开颅血肿清除术中的效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(02):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.064]
　LIU Wei-lan,LUO Li-zhen.Effect of Perioperative Nursing Intervention on Craniotomy Hematoma Clearance of Small Bone Window in Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(14):166.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.064]
[2]韩 冬.小骨窗血肿清除术与微创穿刺血肿引流术治疗 高血压脑出血的效果比较[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.035]
　HAN Dong.Comparison of Small Window Hematoma Clearance and Minimally Invasive Hematoma Drainage in the Treatment of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(14):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.035]
[3]雷 明.微创穿刺引流联合开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血 并发脑疝临床效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(07):89.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.028]
　LEI Ming.Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Puncture Drainage Combined with Craniotomy Hematoma in the Treatment of Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage Complicated with Cerebral Hernia[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(14):89.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.028]
[4]陈加富,陈新生.右正中神经电刺激对高血压脑出血后昏迷患者早期促醒治疗的研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(22):85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.22.023]
　CHEN Jia-fu,CHEN Xin-sheng.Study of the Clinical Effect of the Early Right Median Nerve Electrical Stimulation to Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage-induced Coma[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(14):85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.22.023]
[5]袁新春,董 伟,潘泰峰.血清D-二聚体水平与高血压脑出血患者病情严重程度及术后预后的关系[J].医学信息,2022,35(13):165.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.13.041]
　YUAN Xin-chun,DONG Wei,PAN Tai-feng.The Relationship Between Serum D-dimer Level and the Severity and Postoperative Prognosis of Patients with Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(14):165.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.13.041]
[6]王春城.神经内镜辅助对高血压脑出血中患者神经缺损及安全性的影响[J].医学信息,2019,32(08):139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.08.041]
　WANG Chun-cheng.Effect of Neuroendoscopy on Neurological Deficit and Safety in Patients with Hypertensive Brain Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(14):139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.08.041]
[7]刘 宏,吴政俊,何明方.开颅减压结合脑室外引流术对高血压脑出血破入脑室 感染及预后的影响[J].医学信息,2019,32(12):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.035]
　LIU Hong,WU Zheng-jun,HE Ming-fang.Effect of Craniotomy and Decompression Combined with Extraventricular Drainage on Cerebral Ventricular Infection and Prognosis of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(14):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.035]
[8]韩 晋,陈淑媛,董瑞宾,等.神经生长因子与盐酸氟桂利嗪联合治疗高血压脑出血的疗效[J].医学信息,2019,32(21):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.21.025]
　HAN Jin,CHEN Shu-yuan,DONG Rui-bin,et al.Effect of Nerve Growth Factor Combined with Flunarizine Hydrochloride on Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(14):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.21.025]
[9]吴六仔.纳络酮联合局部亚低温治疗高血压脑出血的疗效及对患者神经功能恢复、认知改善的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(16):125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.031]
　WU Liu-zi.Effect of Naloxone Combined with Local Mild Hypothermia on Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage and its Effect on Neurological Function Recovery and Cognitive Improvement[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(14):125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.031]
[10]赵 雷,封浩野.血肿穿刺引流术与开颅手术治疗高血压脑出血疗效比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(12):136.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.12.036]
　ZHAO Lei,FENG Hao-ye.Comparison of Curative Effect Between Hematoma Puncture Drainage and Craniotomy in the Treatment of Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(14):136.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.12.036]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-15