[1]宋聪睿,王 勇,高 阳,等.经胸乳入路腔镜与颈部入路常规手术对甲状腺良性肿瘤效果[J].医学信息,2020,33(17):106-108.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.17.031]
　SONG Cong-rui,WANG Yong,GAO Yang,et al.The Effect of Transthoracic Approach and Conventional Cervical Approach Surgery on Benign Thyroid Tumors[J].Medical Information,2020,33(17):106-108.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.17.031]
点击复制

经胸乳入路腔镜与颈部入路常规手术对甲状腺良性肿瘤效果()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年17期
页码:
106-108
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Effect of Transthoracic Approach and Conventional Cervical Approach Surgery on Benign Thyroid Tumors
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）17-0106-03
作者:
宋聪睿; 王 勇; 高 阳; 等
（北京大学第三医院北方院区综合外科，北京 100089）
Author(s):
SONG Cong-rui; WANG Yong; GAO Yang; et al
(General Surgery,North Campus,Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100089,China)
关键词:
经胸乳入路腔镜; 颈部入路; 甲状腺良性肿瘤; 并发症
Keywords:
Transthoracic approach endoscopy; Neck approach; Benign thyroid tumor; Complications
分类号:
R736.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.17.031
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察经胸乳入路腔镜与颈部入路常规手术治疗甲状腺良性肿瘤的效果。方法 选取2016年9月~2019年9月我院接诊的100例甲状腺良性肿瘤患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为常规组和观察组，各50例。常规采用颈部入路常规手术治疗，观察组采用经胸乳入路腔镜治疗，比较两组肿瘤切除率、手术指标（手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛度、术后切口引流量）、甲状腺功能指标[促甲状腺激素（TSH）、甲状腺素（T4）、游离甲状腺素（FT4）、游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸（FT3）]、甲状旁腺功能指标[甲状旁腺激素（PTH）、血钙水平、并发症发生率以及美观满意度评分。结果 观察组肿瘤切除率为98.00%，与常规组的96.00%比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；观察组手术时间长于常规组，术中出血量、术后疼痛度、术后切口引流量均小于常规组（P＜0.05）；术后两组TSH、T4、FT3水平均低于术前，FT4均高于术前（P＜0.05），但观察组TSH、T4、FT3、FT4与常规组比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；两组术后PTH水平均高于术前、血钙水平均低于术前（P＜0.05），但观察组与常规组比较（P＞0.05）；观察组并发症发生率为2.00%，低于常规组的8.00%（P＜0.05）；观察组美观满意度评分高于常规组（P＜0.05）。结论 经胸乳入路腔镜与颈部入路常规手术治疗甲状腺良性肿瘤均可获得较理想的效果，对甲状腺和甲状旁腺功能影响基本相似。但是前者术中出血量少，术后疼痛度轻、引流量少，对患者创伤小，术后并发症少，利于患者康复，且瘢痕小，可获得较高的美观满意度。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the effect of transthoracic approach and conventional cervical approach in the treatment of benign thyroid tumors. Methods A total of 100 patients with benign thyroid tumors admitted to our hospital from September 2016 to September 2019 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into the routine group and the observation group by random number table method, with 50 cases in each group. Routine neck approach was used for conventional surgical treatment, and the observation group was treated with transthoracic approach endoscopic treatment. The tumor resection rate and surgical indicators (operating time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, postoperative incision drainage volume were compared between the two groups), thyroid function indexes [thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), thyroxine (T4), free thyroxine (FT4), free triiodothyronine (FT3)], parathyroid function indexes [parathyroid hormone (PTH) ), blood calcium level, complication rate and aesthetic satisfaction score.Results The tumor resection rate in the observation group was 98.00%, compared with 96.00% in the conventional group, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05); the operation time in the observation group was longer than that in the conventional group, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, postoperative incision induction the flow rate was less than that of the conventional group(P<0.05); the levels of TSH, T4, and FT3 in the two groups after surgery were lower than those before surgery, and FT4 was higher than that before surgery(P<0.05),but the observation group TSH, T4, FT3, FT4 compared with the conventional group, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05);The postoperative PTH levels of the two groups were higher than preoperatively, and the blood calcium levels were lower than preoperatively(P＜0.05), but the observation group was compared with the routine group (P＞0.05); complications occurred in the observation group rate was 2.00%, which was lower than 8.00% of the conventional group(P<0.05); the aesthetic satisfaction score of the observation group was higher than that of the conventional group(P<0.05).Conclusion Both transthoracic approach and conventional cervical approach for the treatment of benign thyroid tumors could achieve satisfactory results, and the effects on thyroid and parathyroid functions were basically similar. However, the former had less intraoperative blood loss, mild postoperative pain, less drainage, less trauma to the patient, less postoperative complications, conducive to patient recovery, and small scars, which could achieve high aesthetic satisfaction.

参考文献/References:

[1]莫凯迪,杨建荣,李碧锦,等.传统开放甲状腺切除术与腔镜甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺良性疾病的临床效果比较[J].中国临床新医学,2017,10(6):543-546.[2]陈聃.经乳晕入路腔镜手术与传统开放手术治疗甲状腺肿瘤的临床效果对比[J].浙江创伤外科,2017,22(5):892-893.[3]石朝绩,罗永香,郑达武,等.经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺手术与传统手术治疗甲状腺良性肿瘤的效果比较[J].中国临床新医学,2017,10(4):356-359.[4]卢绪信,韦邦仅,周信竹,等.胸乳入路完全腔镜下行甲状腺切除术与传统开放手术的疗效比较[J].中国临床新医学,2017,10(10):993-996.[5]张小兵,唐世龙,张万宇,等.经乳晕入路腔镜手术在甲状腺肿瘤患者中的临床疗效探讨[J].临床医学工程,2017,24(2):167-168.[6]王凯,李南林.腔镜辅助甲状腺切除手术治疗分化型甲状腺癌的疗效分析[J].临床医学研究与实践,2017,2(21):62-63.[7]张轶,李正凯,李洪涛,等.经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺手术与传统甲状腺手术的疗效对比[J].现代肿瘤医学,2015(24):3585-3588.[8]黄广恒.甲状腺良性肿瘤腔镜辅助下小切口甲状腺手术治疗的临床效果研究[J].中国现代药物应用,2015,9(22):60-61.[9]李小东,刘大伟,张洪超,等.探讨经乳晕入路腔镜下甲状腺手术与传统开放手术的临床对比研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2017,8(14):50-52.[10]田洪森,高祀岩.腔镜辅助颈部小切口手术与传统开放手术治疗甲状腺良性肿瘤的疗效比较[J].中国基层医药,2014,21(21):3220-3222.[11]李力农,赵汉鹏,朱锦腾,等.胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺手术与传统手术治疗甲状腺疾病的优劣分析[J].中国当代医药,2017,24(1):52-54.[12]李建,李耀妮.乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术的术后并发症对比分析[J].临床医学研究与实践,2017,2(19):51-52.[13]胡玉辉,向科妍.全乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺全切除术与开放手术治疗多发性结节性甲状腺肿的临床对照研究[J].华西医学,2014,29(3):499-502.[14]张成雷.腔镜辅助甲状腺切除术与开放手术治疗甲状腺良性结节疗效差异[J].中国医药科学,2017,7(9):220-222,251.[15]刘佳,仇明.腔镜与开放性甲状腺肿瘤切除术的疗效比较[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018,22(1):77-79.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01