[1]张 娜,杜 慧.孕妇肥胖与剖宫产术中、术后并发症发生的关系[J].医学信息,2020,33(18):85-86.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.18.026]
　ZHANG Na,DU Hui.Relationship Between Obesity of Pregnant Women and Complications During and After Cesarean Section[J].Medical Information,2020,33(18):85-86.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.18.026]
点击复制

孕妇肥胖与剖宫产术中、术后并发症发生的关系()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年18期
页码:
85-86
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Relationship Between Obesity of Pregnant Women and Complications During and After Cesarean Section
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）18-0085-02
作者:
张 娜; 杜 慧
（湖北省妇幼保健院产科，湖北 武汉 430071）
Author(s):
ZHANG Na; DU Hui
(Department of Obstetrics,Hubei Provincial Maternity and Child Health Hospital,Wuhan 430071,Hubei,China)
关键词:
孕妇肥胖; 剖宫产; 并发症
Keywords:
Obesity of pregnant women; Cesarean section; Complications
分类号:
R719.8
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.18.026
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析孕妇肥胖与剖宫产术中、术后并发症的关系，以期为剖宫产并发症的防治工作提供参考依据。方法 选择2018年5月~2019年5月我院收治的足月行剖宫产分娩的孕妇368例作为研究对象，按照体重指数（BMI）分为三组，将孕前BMI≥25 kg/m2的125例设为孕前肥胖组，将分娩前BMI＞28 kg/m2的119例设为产前肥胖组，另将孕前BMI为17~24 kg/m2的124例设为正常对照组。比较三组麻醉时间、手术时间、开腹至娩出胎头时间、术中出血量、术后伤口愈合情况、住院时间以及切口脂肪液化发生率。结果 孕前肥胖组麻醉时间、开腹至娩出胎头时间、手术时间均较正常对照组时间稍延长，但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；产前肥胖组麻醉时间、开腹至娩出胎头时间、手术时间均较正常对照组时间延长，术后并发症、血栓性疾病发生率、腹壁切口脂肪液化发生率高于对照组（P＜0.05）；孕、产前肥胖组术中出血量较正常对照组增多，血栓性疾病发生率高于对照组，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；孕前肥胖组术后孕妇术后并发症、切口脂肪液化发生率高于对照组（P＜0.05）；孕、产前肥胖组术后住院时间均长于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 孕妇孕前肥胖、产前肥胖均会延长剖宫产麻醉、手术时间，增加术后发病率，在今后的临床工作中应给予重视，积极采取有效应对措施，加强宣教，控制孕期体重，降低剖宫产率，减少母婴并发症，改善妊娠结局。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the relationship between obesity of pregnant women and complications during and after cesarean section, in order to provide a reference for the prevention and treatment of cesarean section complications.Methods From May 2018 to May 2019, 368 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section were selected as the research objects. They were divided into three groups according to the body mass index (BMI). The pre-pregnancy BMI ≥25 kg/m2 125 cases were set as pre-pregnancy obesity group, 119 cases with BMI＞28 kg/m2 before childbirth were set as antenatal obesity group, and 124 cases with BMI before pregnancy 17-24 kg/m2 were set as normal control group. The anesthesia time, operation time, time from laparotomy to delivery of the fetal head, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative wound healing, hospitalization time, and incidence of incision fat liquefaction were compared among the three groups. Results The pre-pregnancy obesity group anesthesia time, the time from laparotomy to delivery of the fetal head, and the operation time were slightly longer than the normal control group time, but the difference was not statistically significant (P＞0.05); the prenatal obesity group anesthesia time, the time from laparotomy to delivery of the fetal head the time and operation time were longer than those in the normal control group. The incidence of postoperative complications, thrombotic diseases, and fat liquefaction of abdominal wall incision were higher than those of the control group (P＜0.05); the intraoperative bleeding was higher in the pregnant and prenatal obesity groups The normal control group increased, and the incidence of thrombotic diseases was higher than that of the control group, the difference was not statistically significant (P＞0.05); the incidence of postoperative complications and incision fat liquefaction in the pre-pregnancy obesity group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05); the postoperative hospital stay in the pregnancy and prenatal obesity group was longer than that in the control group (P＜0.05).Conclusion Pre-pregnancy obesity and prenatal obesity would prolong the anesthesia and operation time of cesarean section and increase the postoperative morbidity. In future clinical work, attention should be paid to actively adopt effective countermeasures, strengthen publicity and education, control weight during pregnancy, and reduce cesarean section. Uterine birth rate, reduce maternal and infant complications, and improve pregnancy outcome.

参考文献/References:

[1]全光辉,黄飘.个体化营养干预对孕妇孕期体质量增长及妊娠结局的影响分析[J].广州医科大学学报,2017,45(4):46-48.[2]孟雨.孕妇体重超重与剖宫产率的关系[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志,2019,6(24):68-69.[3]Wei YM,Yang HX,Zhu WW,et al.Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes stratified for pre-pregnancy body mass index[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2016,29(13):2205-2209. [4]Poston L,Caleyachetty R,Cnattingius S,et al.Preconceptional and meternal obesity:epidemiologyandhealth consequences[J].The lancet Diabetes＆Endocrinology,2016,4(12):1025-1036.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘汉芬.剖宫产术后护理干预对产妇康复效果的影响分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(01):169.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.01.067]
　LIU Han-fen.Effect of Nursing Intervention on Maternal Rehabilitation after Cesarean Section[J].Medical Information,2018,31(18):169.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.01.067]
[2]刘 礼.影响剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫足月分娩结局的相关因素分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(02):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.039]
　LIU Li.Analysis of Related Factors Influencing the Outcome of Full Term Delivery of Scar Uterus after Cesarean Section[J].Medical Information,2018,31(18):109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.02.039]
[3]李 欢,刘 俊,夏军辉.妊娠期高血压疾病患者血浆Pro BNP水平及其临床意义[J].医学信息,2018,31(04):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.059]
　LI Huan,LIU Jun,XIA Jun-hui.Plasma Pro BNP Levels in Patients with Hypertensive Disorder Complicating Pregnancy and their Clinical Significance[J].Medical Information,2018,31(18):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.059]
[4]鲁秋彤.经阴道彩色多普勒超声在诊断剖宫产子宫疤痕妊娠中的 价值研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):160.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.058]
　LU Qiu-tong.The Value of Transvaginal Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy[J].Medical Information,2018,31(18):160.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.058]
[5]蒋红梅.子宫下段横形环状压迫缝合术治疗前置胎盘剖宫产术中 胎盘剥离面出血的临床研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(07):120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.040]
　JIANG Hong-mei.Clinical Study on the Treatment of Placental Exfoliation Bleeding in Caesarean Section of Placenta Previa by Transverse Annular Compression Suture of Lower Uterine Segment[J].Medical Information,2018,31(18):120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.040]
[6]冉会仁.小剂量舒芬太尼在剖宫产术麻醉中预防寒战及 牵拉痛的疗效评价[J].医学信息,2018,31(08):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.08.032]
　RAN Hui-ren.Evaluation of the Efficacy of Low-dose Sufentanil in Preventing Chills and Pulling Pain during Cesarean Section Anesthesia[J].Medical Information,2018,31(18):101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.08.032]
[7]王玉霞.剖宫产术后子宫疤痕妊娠的临床诊治[J].医学信息,2018,31(10):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.015]
　WANG Yu-xia.Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Uterine Scar Pregnancy after Cesarean Section[J].Medical Information,2018,31(18):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.10.015]
[8]龙俊青.臀位外倒转术的应用研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(12):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.019]
　LONG Jun-qing.Application Study of Breech Presentation[J].Medical Information,2019,32(18):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.019]
[9]熊 丽,蒋明珉,何娅娟.以护士为主导的疼痛管理模式在剖宫产围手术期的应用研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(01):179.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.01.058]
　XIONG Li,JIANG Ming-min,HE Ya-juan.Application Study of Nurse-led Pain Management Model in Perioperative Period of Cesarean Section[J].Medical Information,2019,32(18):179.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.01.058]
[10]王 颖,石显江,陈斯乔,等.多巴胺预注射在剖宫产腰硬联合麻醉的临床应用[J].医学信息,2019,32(11):150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.11.044]
　WANG Ying,SHI Xian-jiang,CHEN Si-qiao,et al.Clinical Application of Dopamine Pre-injection in Cesarean Section Combined with Spinal Anesthesia[J].Medical Information,2019,32(18):150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.11.044]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01