[1]宋来雪,郑国瑜,李 雪.负压封闭引流术治疗创伤软组织缺损的临床疗效[J].医学信息,2020,33(18):87-88.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.18.027]
　SONG Lai-xue,ZHENG Guo-yu,LI Xue.The Clinical Effect of Negative Pressure Sealing Drainage in the Treatment of Traumatic Soft Tissue Defects[J].Medical Information,2020,33(18):87-88.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.18.027]
点击复制

负压封闭引流术治疗创伤软组织缺损的临床疗效()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年18期
页码:
87-88
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Clinical Effect of Negative Pressure Sealing Drainage in the Treatment of Traumatic Soft Tissue Defects
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）18-0087-02
作者:
宋来雪; 郑国瑜; 李 雪
（山东省东阿县人民医院创伤骨科，山东 东阿 252201）
Author(s):
SONG Lai-xue; ZHENG Guo-yu; LI Xue
(Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics,Dong’e County People’s Hospital,Dong’e 252201,Shandong,China)
关键词:
负压封闭引流敷料; 创伤骨科; 软组织缺损
Keywords:
Negative pressure sealing drainage dressing; Trauma orthopedics; Soft tissue defect
分类号:
R658
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.18.027
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨负压封闭引流术治疗创伤软组织缺损的效果。方法 选取2014年2月~2019年2月我院创伤骨科收治的创伤软组织缺损患者100例为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，每组50例。对照组行常规换药治疗，观察组采用负压封闭引流术治疗；比较两组临床疗效以及治疗时间。结果 观察组总有效率为96.00%，高于对照组的60.00%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组治疗时间为（12.00±1.05）d，对照组治疗时间为（17.80±5.50）d，两组比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 负压封闭引流术治疗创伤软组织缺损可缩短治疗时间，总有效率高，效果良好，可在临床中应用。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effect of negative pressure sealing drainage in the treatment of traumatic soft tissue defects.Methods A total of 100 patients with trauma and soft tissue defects admitted to the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics in our hospital from February 2014 to February 2019 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 50 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional dressing change, and the observation group was treated with negative pressure closed drainage; the clinical efficacy and treatment time of the two groups were compared.Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 96.00%, which was higher than 60.00% of the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); the treatment time of the observation group was (12.00±1.05) d, and the treatment time of the control group was (17.80±5.50)d, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Negative pressure sealing drainage for the treatment of traumatic soft tissue defects could shorten the treatment time, and the total effective rate was high, and the effect was good. It could be used in clinical practice.

参考文献/References:

[1]李金宸,张军,郑纪元,等.持续封闭负压引流术在骨科创伤中的临床疗效观察[J].中国卫生标准管理,2013(14):9-11.[2]严佳敏.四肢骨干开放性骨折患者的院前急救护理体会[J].医学信息,2013,25(11):613.[3]牛彦辉,吴帆,王越,等.封闭式负压引流技术治疗四肢软组织创面效果观察[J].临床误诊误治,2013(5):92-94.[4]蓝岚,蓝海宏.用负压封闭引流技术处理创伤性皮肤软组织缺损及感染创面的临床效果分析[J].当代医药论丛,2014(20):206-207.[5]刘祥伟.负压封闭引流技术治疗骨创伤创面软组织损伤的效果分析［J］．中国卫生标准管理,2017,8(21):43-45．[6]曾进强,李龙,周华乔,等.负压封闭引流技术与传统换药术在软组织损伤修复中的临床疗效及安全性对比研究[J].临床医学工程,2016,23(2):189-190.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01