[1]付艳伟,张 睿.腹腔镜下全腹膜外与经正中线切口腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J].医学信息,2020,33(24):119-121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.24.033]
　FU Yan-wei,ZHANG Rui.Comparison of the Curative Effect of Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal and Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair Through Midline Incision[J].Medical Information,2020,33(24):119-121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.24.033]
点击复制

腹腔镜下全腹膜外与经正中线切口腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年24期
页码:
119-121
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the Curative Effect of Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal and Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair Through Midline Incision
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）24-0119-03
作者:
付艳伟1; 张 睿2
1.天津港口医院外科，天津 300450； 2.苏州市相城人民医院肝胆外科，江苏 苏州 215131
Author(s):
FU Yan-wei1; ZHANG Rui2
1.Department of Surgery,Tianjin Port Hospital,Tianjin 300450,China; 2.Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Xiangcheng People’s Hospital,Suzhou 215131,Jiangsu,China
关键词:
腹腔镜; 全腹膜外; 腹股沟疝; 疝修补术
Keywords:
Laparoscopy; Total extraperitoneal; Inguinal hernia; Hernia repair
分类号:
R656.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.24.033
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察腹腔镜下全腹膜外与经正中线切口腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的疗效。方法 选取2018年3月~2019年3月我院治疗的98例腹股沟疝修患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各49例。对照组采用经正中线切口腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术治疗，观察组采用腹腔镜下全腹膜外修补术治疗，比较两组手术指标（手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、住院时间、住院费用）、不同时间段（术后1天、1、3、5个月）疼痛（VAS）评分、并发症发生情况以及复发率。结果 观察组手术时间、住院费用均大于对照组，术中出血量、肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、住院时间均小于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组术后1天、1、3个月VAS评分均低于对照组（P＜0.05），术后5个月低于对照组，但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；观察组并发症发生率为4.08%，低于对照组的10.20%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；随访6个月，观察组复发率为2.04%，与对照组的4.08%比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 经正中线切口腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术在手术时间和住院费用方面具有优势，虽然腹腔镜下全腹膜外手术时间长，住院费用大，但术中出血量少，术后胃肠和下床活动时间段，术后疼痛评分低，并发症少，利于患者的康复，具有临床应用的重要价值。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the efficacy of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal and preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair through midline incision. Methods A total of 98 patients with inguinal hernia repaired in our hospital from March 2018 to March 2019 were selected as the research objects, and they were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 49 cases in each group. The control group was treated with preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair through a midline incision, and the observation group was treated with laparoscopic total epiperitoneal repair. The two groups were compared with surgical indicators (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, anal exhaust time, out of bed activity)time, length of hospitalization, hospitalization expenses), pain (VAS) scores at different time periods (1 day, 1, 3, and 5 months after surgery), occurrence of complications, and recurrence rate.Results The operation time and hospitalization cost of the observation group were greater than those of the control group. The intraoperative blood loss, anal exhaust time, time to get out of bed, and hospitalization time were all less than those of the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); The VAS scores at 1 day, 1, and 3 months were lower than those of the control group (P＜0.05), and 5 months after the operation, they were lower than the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P＞0.05); the incidence of complications in the observation group was 4.08%, lower than 10.20% of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); follow-up for 6 months, the recurrence rate of the observation group was 2.04%, compared with 4.08% of the control group, the difference was not statistically significant (P＞0.05).Conclusion Preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair through midline incision has advantages in terms of operation time and hospitalization costs. Although total extraperitoneal surgery under laparoscopic surgery takes a long time and the hospitalization costs are high, the amount of intraoperative blood loss is small, and the gastrointestinal and out-of-bed after surgery during the active period, the postoperative pain score is low and the complications are few, which is conducive to the rehabilitation of patients and has important clinical application value.

参考文献/References:

[1]任士贵.经腹腔腹膜前修补术与全腹膜外修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝疗效比较[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2015,32(1):73-74. [2]张云,郝晓晖,李健文,等.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J].中华消化外科杂志,2016,15(10):967-971. [3]汪磊,李宏.全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术与经腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J].现代实用医学,2016,28(2):183-184. [4]许斌.腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效比较观察[J].中国实用医药,2016,4(1):88-89. [5]唐石驹,吴水来,董红平,等.腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补对中青年男性腹股沟疝疗效的影响[J].中国内镜杂志,2017,23(12):83-87. [6]Shalaby R,Abd AM,Elsaied A,et al.Fifteen Years Experience with Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Infants and Children[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2018,28(1):101-105. [7]李奎.腹腔镜下全腹膜外疝修补术和经腹腹膜前疝修补术的有效性和安全性探讨[J].临床医学研究与实践,2017,2(4):63-65. [8]王桐生,丁磊,赵爱民,等.腹腔镜下全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与经正中线切口腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的比较研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2016,16(2):118-121. [9]李发根,陈志豪,刘艺辉.腹腔镜下全腹膜外补片植入术与经腹腹膜前补片植入术治疗腹股沟疝的效果比较[J].河南医学研究,2016,25(12):2250-2251. [10]吴勇兴.腹腔镜疝修补、无张力疝修补及传统疝修补术的临床疗效分析[J].当代医学,2017,23(14):34-35. [11]李义亮,王志,克力木,等.腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片植入术与Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效对比研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2017,20(8):928-931. [12]王明刚,申英末,陈杰,等.腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补技术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的疗效观察[J].中华医学杂志,2016,96(20):1588-1590. [13]Rajapandian S,Bhushan C,Sabnis SC,et al.Single incision multiport versus conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair:A matched comparison[J].J Minimal Access Surgery,2018,14(1):44-51. [14]刘春富,宫金伟,许军.下腹正中切口入路腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术临床应用研究[J].中国实用外科杂志,2014,34(5):435-437. [15]刘颜良,曹钧,张杨,等.腹腔镜下完全腹膜外疝修补术75例[J].中国微创外科杂志,2016,16(11):1002-1005.

相似文献/References:

[1]王 丹.腹腔镜子宫全切除术与开腹手术的临床效果分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(03):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.034]
　WANG Dan.Analysis of Clinical Effects between Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Open Hysterectomy[J].Medical Information,2018,31(24):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.034]
[2]李华桥.腹腔镜联合胃镜行胃间质瘤切除术对胃间质瘤患者 术后康复及并发症的影响分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(05):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.039]
　LI Hua-qiao.Effect of Laparoscopy Combined with Gastroscopy for Gastric Stromal Tumor Resection on Postoperative Rehabilitation and Complications of Gastric Stromal Tumor Patients[J].Medical Information,2018,31(24):114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.039]
[3]李建勇.腹腔镜下手术治疗卵巢巧克力囊肿研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(12):57.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.018]
　LI Jian-yong.Laparoscopic Surgery for Ovarian Chocolate Cysts[J].Medical Information,2018,31(24):57.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.018]
[4]夏易曼娜,李虎成.腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术与传统开腹手术的对比研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(12):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.036]
　XIA Yi-manna,LI Hu-cheng.Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Cervical Cancer and Traditional Open Surgery[J].Medical Information,2018,31(24):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.12.036]
[5]张东霞,李文超,白雨昕.腹腔镜下异位妊娠病灶清除术的治疗效果及对患者炎性反应指标和术后恢复的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(11):121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.031]
　ZHANG Dong-xia,LI Wen-chao,BAI Yu-xin.Effect of Laparoscopic Removal of Ectopic Pregnancy and its influence on Inflammatory Response Indexes and Postoperative Recovery[J].Medical Information,2022,35(24):121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.031]
[6]刘秀娟,刘 辉.子宫内膜异位症相关性不孕的诊断及治疗研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(14):35.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.012]
　LIU Xiu-juan,LIU Hui.Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometriosis Related Infertility[J].Medical Information,2018,31(24):35.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.14.012]
[7]张 磊,张学军.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术临床疗效单中心回顾性研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(02):118.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.02.033]
　ZHANG Lei,ZHANG Xue-jun.A Single-center Retrospective Study of Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy[J].Medical Information,2019,32(24):118.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.02.033]
[8]闫 军,寇旭东,马 博,等.Hem-o-lok结扎锁和Endoloop套扎在 腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(18):83.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.025]
　YAN Jun,KOU Xu-dong,MA Bo,et al.Clinical Study of Hem-o-lok Ligation Lock and Endoloop Ligation in Laparoscopic Appendectomy[J].Medical Information,2018,31(24):83.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.18.025]
[9]韦 林,赵军玲,宾 力,等.异位妊娠腹腔镜镜像与TVS表现及 血清β-HCG表达的相关性研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(12):85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.026]
　WEI Lin,ZHAO Jun-ling,BIN Li,et al.Correlation Research between Laparoscopic Mirror Image of Ectopic Pregnancy and TVS Expression and Serum β-HCG Expression[J].Medical Information,2019,32(24):85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.026]
[10]姚文超,彭继红.腹腔镜下电凝阻断子宫动脉在无生育要求患者子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用及预后[J].医学信息,2018,31(21):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.21.028]
　YAO Wen-chao,PENG Ji-hong.Application and Prognosis of Laparoscopic Electrocoagulation for Uterine Artery Removal in Patients with Uterine Fibroids without Fertility Requirements[J].Medical Information,2018,31(24):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.21.028]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01