[1]魏程锦.多切口减压+VSD持续负压吸引治疗急性坏死性筋膜炎的临床应用研究[J].医学信息,2021,34(23):144-146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.23.043]
　WEI Cheng-jin.Clinical Application of Multi-incision Decompression and VSD Continuous Negative Pressure Suction in the Treatment of Acute Necrotizing Fasciitis[J].Medical Information,2021,34(23):144-146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.23.043]
点击复制

多切口减压+VSD持续负压吸引治疗急性坏死性筋膜炎的临床应用研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年23期
页码:
144-146
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Application of Multi-incision Decompression and VSD Continuous Negative Pressure Suction in the Treatment of Acute Necrotizing Fasciitis
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）23-0144-03
作者:
魏程锦
（天津市人民医院肛肠疾病诊疗中心，天津 300121）
Author(s):
WEI Cheng-jin
(Medical Center for Anorectal Disease,Tianjin People’s Hospital,Tianjin 300121,China)
关键词:
多切口减压; VSD持续负压吸引; 急性坏死性筋膜炎
Keywords:
Multi-incision decompression; VSD continuous negative pressure suction; Acute necrotizing fasciitis
分类号:
R686.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.23.043
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究多切口减压+VSD持续负压吸引治疗急性坏死性筋膜炎的临床疗效。方法 选取2019年2月-2021年2月我院诊治的40例急性坏死性筋膜炎患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，各20例。对照组采用多切口减压治疗，观察组在对照组基础上联合VSD持续负压吸引治疗，比较两组治疗总有效率、临床治疗指标、疼痛评分、并发症发生率。结果 观察组治疗总有效率为85.00%，高于对照组的75.00%（P＜0.05）；观察组创口愈合时间、换药次数、住院时间均小于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组疼痛评分低于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组并发症发生率为10.00%，低于对照组的20.00%（P＜0.05）。结论 多切口减压联合VSD持续负压吸引治疗急性坏死性筋膜炎效果确切，可提高临床治疗总有效率，促进创口快速愈合，减少换药频率，缩短周期，减轻患者疼痛度，降低并发症发生率，是一种可行、有效的治疗方案。
Abstract:
Objective To study the clinical efficacy of multi-incision decompression and VSD continuous negative pressure suction in the treatment of acute necrotizing fasciitis.Methods Forty patients with acute necrotizing fasciitis who were treated in our hospital from February 2019 to February 2021 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 20 cases in each group. The control group was treated with multi-incision decompression, and the observation group was treated with VSD continuous negative pressure suction on the basis of the control group. The total effective rate, clinical treatment index, pain score and complication rate of the two groups were compared.Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 85.00%, which was higher than 75.00% of the control group (P<0.05). The wound healing time, dressing change times and hospitalization time in the observation group were less than those in the control group (P<0.05). The pain score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 10.00%, which was lower than 20.00% in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Multi-incision decompression combined with VSD continuous negative pressure suction is effective in the treatment of acute necrotizing fasciitis, which can improve the total effective rate of clinical treatment, promote rapid wound healing, reduce the frequency of dressing change, shorten the cycle, reduce the pain and the incidence of complications. It is a feasible and effective treatment plan.

参考文献/References:

[1]Scheid C,Dudda M,Jager M.Necrotizing fasciitis-a clinical diagnosis[J].Orthopade,2016,45(12):1072-1079.[2]Harbrecht BG,Nash NA.Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: A Review[J].Surg Infect (Larchmt),2016,17(5):503-509.[3]王佳妮,吕娜,周兵,等.VSD用于肛周坏死性筋膜炎手术对术后创面愈合效果的影响及其作用机制研究[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2019,24(6):635-638.[4]胥学冰,张晓启,司迎,等.负压封闭引流术治疗肛周坏死性筋膜炎17例[J].武警医学,2020,15(7):378-382.[5]Gore MR.Odontogenic necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review of the literature[J].BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord,2018(18):14.[6]狐鸣,彭灵智,邱志胜,等.躯干急性坏死性筋膜炎1例[J].中国现代医药杂志,2016,18(3):8788.[7]邓呈亮,魏在荣,曾雪琴,等.VSD技术治疗糖尿病合并急性坏死性筋膜炎并发感染性休克1例[J].中国急救医学,2016,36(7):667-668.[8]中国医师协会肛肠医师分会临床指南工作委员会.肛周坏死性筋膜炎临床诊治中国专家共识(2019年)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2019,22(7):689-693.[9]Hadeed GJ,Smith J,O’Keeffe T,et al.Early surgical intervention and its impact on patients presenting with necrotizing soft tissue infections: A single academic center experience[J].J Emerg Trauma Shock,2016,9(1):22-27.[10]孙向东,乔维龙,李成志,等.负压创面治疗技术治疗坏死性筋膜炎29例[J].皮肤性病诊疗学杂志,2019,26(5):293-296.[11]Kloth C,Hoefert S,Fischborn T,et al.Dentogene Focus as a Rare Cause of Necrotizing Fasciitis[J].Dtsch Med Wochenschr,2017,142(3):212-215.[12]田欣.持续封闭负压引流技术在坏死性筋膜炎治疗中的应用及对患者生活质量影响分析[J].现代诊断与治疗,2018,29(24):4002-4004.[13]赵素斌,李守霞,张文娴,等.持续封闭负压引流技术在坏死性筋膜炎治疗中的应用价值[J].中国医学装备,2017,14(12):75-77.[14]谢宇,梁德森,孟庆辉,等.负压封闭引流技术应用于坏死性筋膜炎术后创面修复的疗效研究[J].中华损伤与修复杂志,2018,13(5):331-335.[15]杜元良,肖天洁,缪旭,等.早期切开联合封闭负压引流技术治疗老年下肢坏死性筋膜炎的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(11):2646-2648.[16]赵丹,王城,许莉,等.负压封闭引流技术在儿童坏死性筋膜炎治疗中的临床应用[J].四川医学,2016,37(12):1387-1389.[17]周胜.清创术联合VSD引流术治疗肛周坏死性筋膜炎的临床研究[J].结直肠肛门外科,2017,23(5):602-605.[18]赵耀华,袁东亮,熊伟,等.双通路负压封闭引流治疗肛周坏死性筋膜炎六例[J].中华烧伤杂志,2016,32(12):730-732.[19]李梅岭,何洪芹,张秀艳,等.肛周急性坏死性筋膜炎18例临床分析[J].疑难病杂志,2018,17(3):300-302.[20]郑介飞,屠海霞,曹玉珏,等.综合治疗肛周坏死性筋膜炎十例[J].中华烧伤杂志,2019,35(4):311-313.[21]高丕尧,廖存,甘嘉亮,等.肛周坏死性筋膜炎辅助检查特点及不同手术治疗效果对比分析[J].重庆医学,2017,46(2):225-227.[22]付焱,张冰,李恒,等.改良负压封闭引流术治疗肛周坏死性筋膜炎的临床疗效观察[J].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2019,8(1):54-58.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01