[1]邹 莉,邹长娇,陈丽华.新型泌尿外科护理管理模式对外科住院患者治疗及降低院内尿路感染的影响[J].医学信息,2024,37(05):161-164.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.05.030]
 ZOU Li,ZOU Chang-jiao,CHEN Li-hua.Effect of New Urological Nursing Management Model on the Treatment and the Reduction of Nosocomial Urinary Tract Infection for Surgical Inpatients[J].Journal of Medical Information,2024,37(05):161-164.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.05.030]
点击复制

新型泌尿外科护理管理模式对外科住院患者治疗及降低院内尿路感染的影响()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
37卷
期数:
2024年05期
页码:
161-164
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2024-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of New Urological Nursing Management Model on the Treatment and the Reduction of Nosocomial Urinary Tract Infection for Surgical Inpatients
文章编号:
1006-1959(2024)05-0161-04
作者:
邹 莉邹长娇陈丽华
(会昌县人民医院院感办,江西 会昌 362400)
Author(s):
ZOU LiZOU Chang-jiaoCHEN Li-hua
(Hospital-Acquired Infection Control Department,Huichang County People’s Hospital,Huichang 362400,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
泌尿外科护理管理尿路感染疼痛舒适度不良事件医疗纠纷
Keywords:
Urological nursing managementUrinary tract infectionPainComfortAdverseeventsMedical disputes
分类号:
R473.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2024.05.030
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究新型泌尿外科护理管理模式对外科住院患者康复效果及院内尿路感染的影响。方法 以2019年12月-2021年12月会昌县人民医院泌尿外科收治的67例住院患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组(34例)和观察组(33例)。对照组采用常规泌尿外科护理管理模式,观察组开展新型泌尿外科护理管理模式,比较两组疼痛程度[视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分]、舒适度情况[Kolcaba舒适状况量表(GCQ)评分]、术后恢复情况(术后下床时间、术后进食时间、术后住院时间)、院内尿路感染、不良事件、医疗纠纷、护理满意度。结果 术后24 h,观察组VAS评分低于对照组,GCQ评分高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术后下床时间、术后进食时间、术后住院时间均短于对照组(P<0.05);观察组院内尿路感染发生率、不良事件发生率、医疗纠纷发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组护理满意度评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 新型泌尿外科护理管理模式可缓解患者术后疼痛,改善其住院舒适度,加快术后康复,降低院内尿路感染风险,减少不良事件与医患纠纷,具有良好的满意度反馈。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effect of new urology nursing management mode on the rehabilitation effect and nosocomial urinary tract infection of surgical inpatients.Methods A total of 67 inpatients admitted to the Department of Urology, Huichang County People’s Hospital from December 2019 to December 2021 were divided into control group (34 inpatients) and observation group (33 inpatients) according to the random number table method. The control group was treated with routine urology nursing management mode, while the observation group was treated with new urology nursing management mode. The pain degree [visual analogue scale (VAS) score], comfort degree [Kolcabageneral comfort questionnaire (GCQ)score], postoperative recovery (postoperative bed time, postoperative feeding time, postoperative hospitalization time), nosocomial urinary tract infection, adverse events, medical disputes and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results At 24 h after operation, the VAS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the GCQ score was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The postoperative ambulation time, postoperative feeding time and postoperative hospitalization time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of urinary tract infection, adverse events and medical disputes in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion The new urological nursing management model can relieve postoperative pain, improve the comfort of hospitalization, accelerate postoperative rehabilitation, reduce the risk of urinary tract infection in hospital, reduce adverse events and doctor-patient disputes, and have good satisfaction feedback.

参考文献/References:

[1]张景云,付成伟,田维兰,等.基于感染控制的护理管理干预模式对泌尿外科预防不良事件的效果[J].中国消毒学杂志,2021,38(12):929-931.[2]Lajiness MJ.Special Issues in Urology Nursing: Rationing Urology Care During a Pandemic: A Primer[J].Urologic Nursing,2021,4(1):813-816.[3]穆敏,彭敏.泌尿外科手术患者围术期综合护理干预[J].实用临床医药杂志,2019,23(2):125-128.[4]于书慧,王为,车新艳,等.泌尿外科患者短期留置导尿管的循证护理研究[J].护理学杂志,2020,35(17):93-97.[5]刘杰,王伟,胡雪辉,等.前列腺增生并急性尿潴留急诊导尿失败后两种治疗方法比较[J].国际老年医学杂志,2017,38(2):70-72.[6]王文静,陈鹏.手术室疼痛护理对非全麻患者舒适度的影响[J].河南医学研究,2015,24(12):146-147.[7]赵兴兰,李瑞,尹娜,等.泌尿外科患儿留置导尿管相关尿路感染的危险因素及护理策略[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(20):112-115.[8]Kouame B,Ndoye M,Kramo F,et al.Men Urethra Strictures: Findings in Urethroplasties Care at the Andrology and Urology Department of Grand Yoff General Hospital in Dakar[J].Open Journal of Urology,2017,7(10):173-185.[9]高静,沈静静.康复外科理念联合心理护理在泌尿外科手术患者中的应用[J].护士进修杂志,2017,32(1):81-83.[10]付智慧.个性化护理对泌尿外科患者围术期生理应激和满意度的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2017,26(36):4100-4102.[11]南宁,段利宁.泌尿外科老年患者手术护理风险因素及其干预效果观察[J].老年医学与保健,2017,23(6):577-579.[12]亢亚兰,龚桂芝.综合护理干预对泌尿外科手术患者术后疼痛的影响[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2017,28(2):525.[13]徐菲,王晨,刘敏君.疼痛宣教对泌尿外科患者术后疼痛控制程度的影响[J].中华全科医学,2017,15(3):524-527.[14]张玲.个性化护理模式对男性泌尿外科患者围术期的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018,22(18):83-86.[15]刘娟,许敬萍,周萍,等.快速康复外科理念在泌尿外科常见腹腔镜手术围手术期护理中的应用[J].广东医学,2018,39(6):952-956.[16]王伟莹.老年患者长期留置尿管相关尿路感染的护理与预防策略[J].重庆医学,2017,46(2):410-411.[17]刘新,唐楠.泌尿外科护理中优质护理服务的临床应用效果研究[J].结直肠肛门外科,2020,26(1):109-110.[18]李辉,庞海霞.系统护理干预对泌尿外科腹腔镜手术患者的疗效观察[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(2):74-76.[19]张伟伟.泌尿外科留置尿管患者预防尿路感染的护理观察[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2019,1(1):336-336.[20]Longchamp A,Harputlugil E,Corpataux JM,et al.Is Overnight Fasting before Surgery Too Much or Not Enough? How Basic Aging Research Can Guide Preoperative Nutritional Recommendations to Improve Surgical Outcomes: A Mini-Review[J].Gerontology,2017,63(3):228-237.

相似文献/References:

[1]柳 梅.头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠治疗糖尿病并发尿路感染的 临床效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(07):139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.047]
 LIU Mei.Clinical Efficacy of Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium in Treatment of Diabetes Complicated with Urinary Tract Infection[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(05):139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.07.047]
[2]钱菲菲,周 易.尿路感染诊断治疗中临床微生物检验的病原菌结果分析[J].医学信息,2022,35(23):159.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.23.035]
 QIAN Fei-fei,ZHOU Yi.Analysis of Pathogenic Bacteria Results of Clinical Microbiological Examination in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(05):159.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.23.035]
[3]雷 欣,陈筱云.糖尿病合并尿路感染中医临证治验[J].医学信息,2021,34(07):162.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.07.046]
[4]茹银转,胡桂贞,陈云开,等.2018年~2020年某基层医院尿路感染的细菌分布及耐药状况调查[J].医学信息,2021,34(12):148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.12.040]
 RU Yin-zhuan,HU Gui-zhen,CHEN Yun-kai,et al.Survey of Bacterial Distribution and Drug Resistance of Urinary Tract Infections in a Primary Hospital from 2018 to 2020[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(05):148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.12.040]
[5]魏长斌.头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠对糖尿病合并尿路感染的疗效及安全性分析[J].医学信息,2021,34(14):151.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.14.042]
 WEI Chang-bin.Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium on Diabetes Complicated with Urinary Tract Infection[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(05):151.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.14.042]
[6]肖春芳.尿路感染患者奇异变形杆菌分布及耐药性分析[J].医学信息,2021,34(24):187.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.051]
 XIAO Chun-fang.Distribution and Drug Resistance of Proteus Mirabilis in Patients with Urinary Tract Infection[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(05):187.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.051]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01