[1]李 岩.2016~2018年天津市职业病危害因素现场检测状况调查[J].医学信息,2020,33(07):129-131.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.07.041]
　Li Yan.Investigation on the Status of on-site Detection of Occupational Hazards in Tianjin from 2016 to 2018[J].Medical Information,2020,33(07):129-131.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.07.041]
点击复制

2016~2018年天津市职业病危害因素现场检测状况调查()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年07期
页码:
129-131
栏目:
调查分析
出版日期:
2020-04-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Investigation on the Status of on-site Detection of Occupational Hazards in Tianjin from 2016 to 2018
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）07-0129-03
作者:
李 岩
（天津市津南区疾病预防控制中心职业卫生科，天津 300350）
Author(s):
Li Yan
(Department of Occupational Health,Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Tianjin Jinnan District,Tianjin 300350,China)
关键词:
职业病危害因素; 质量控制; 对策
Keywords:
Occupational hazards; Quality control; Countermeasures
分类号:
R511.5
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.07.041
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析2016~2018年天津市职业病危害因素现场检测状况。方法 按照工作场所空气中有害物质检测的采样规范（GBZ159-2004）进行，实验室检测分析按照国家相关标准规定，统计2016~2018年天津市大型、中型、小型以及企业不详测定点、合格率；分析职业病现场因素，包括矽尘、石棉尘、煤尘、苯、铅、噪音、布鲁氏菌，并统计各年的测定点、合格率。结果 2016年的企业职业病危害因素现场检测合格率高于2017、2018年，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；2016~2018年大型、中型以及不详企业职业病危害因素现场检测合格率比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），2016、2017年大型、小型企业现场检测合格率低于2018年，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），2016年中型、不详企业的现场检测合格率高于2017、2018年，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；2016~2018年矽尘、石棉尘、苯、噪音、布鲁氏菌现场检测超标率比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），2017年矽尘、石棉尘、噪音、苯检测超标率高于2016、2018年，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 我市职业病检测工作还需进一步加强，应对矽尘、石棉尘、噪音、苯进行持续检测，并采用相应的措施，进一步减少职业病危害因素。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the on-site detection status of occupational hazard factors in Tianjin from 2016 to 2018.Methods According to the sampling standard(GBZ159-2004)for the detection of hazardous substances in the air in the workplace,the laboratory test analysis is based on the relevant national standards,and statistics of the large,medium,small,and unknown measurement points and qualification rates of Tianjin from 2016 to 2018,Occupational disease site factors,including silica dust,asbestos dust,coal dust,benzene,lead,noise,brucella,and statistics of the measurement points and pass rates for each year.Results The on-site testing pass rate of occupational hazards in 2016 was higher than that in 2017 and 2018,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05);The comparison of on-site testing qualification rates of occupational hazard factors for large,medium and unknown companies from 2016 to 2018 was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The on-site testing qualification rates of large and small enterprises in 2016 and 2017 are lower than that of 2018,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The on-site inspection pass rate of medium-sized and unknown companies in 2016 is higher than that in 2017 and 2018,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05);The comparison of on-site detection rate of silica dust,asbestos dust,benzene,noise and brucella in 2016~2018 was statistically significant(P＜0.05).In 2017,the detection rate of silicon dust,asbestos dust,noise and benzene was high In 2016 and 2018,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).Conclusion Occupational disease testing in our city needs to be further strengthened.Continuous testing should be carried out for silica dust,asbestos dust,noise,and benzene,and corresponding measures should be adopted to further reduce occupational disease hazards.

参考文献/References:

[1]韩珊珊,李振雪,邢鹏.大连市某石蜡工艺品加工企业职业病危害现状调查与评价[J].职业与健康,2019,35(15):2045-2049. [2]梁宁,付丛丛.三门峡市某轮毂制造企业职业病危害因素检测及作业人员职业健康检查结果[J].职业与健康,2018,34(18):20-22,26. [3]他卉,杨杰,曹应琼,等.某省职业病危害因素监测与职业健康检查情况分析[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2019,37(7):522-525. [4]杨光涛,香映平,朱晓玲,等.深圳市39家电子企业有机溶剂职业病危害现状调查[J].中国职业医学,2019,46(3):403-406. [5]申化坤,王永伟.模糊数学模型在水泥生产企业职业病危害风险评估中的应用[J].预防医学情报杂志,2019,35(6):593-598. [6]杨光涛,朱晓玲,王雪毓,等.深圳市某8家黄金珠宝首饰加工企业职业病危害因素调查[J].现代预防医学,2017,44(8):53-55. [7]郭国强,贺中汉,黄伟乐,等.薄膜晶体管液晶显示器生产过程中的职业病危害因素识别与分析[J].实用预防医学,2019,26(8):978-980. [8]张彩霞,侯兴爱,商慧珍.某机械厂职业病危害因素及防护现状调查[J].山西医药杂志,2019,48(13):1543-1545.

相似文献/References:

[1]余 娜.临床尿液常规检验的质量控制分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(03):156.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.057]
　YU Na.Analysis on Quality Control of Routine Test of Clinical Urine[J].Medical Information,2018,31(07):156.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.03.057]
[2]曲春清,孙文非,边朝卿.2017年大连市部分用人单位职业病危害因素检测结果分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(07):146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.044]
　QU Chun-qing,SUN Wen-fei,BIAN Chao-qing.Analysis of Test Results of Occupational Hazards in Some Employers in Dalian,2017[J].Medical Information,2019,32(07):146.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.044]
[3]田维科,雷 蓉,李 芸,等.健康管理服务质量控制的现状与思考[J].医学信息,2019,32(08):39.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.08.013]
　TIAN Wei-ke,LEI Rong,LIYun,et al.Status of Health Service Quality Control Management and Thinking[J].Medical Information,2019,32(07):39.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.08.013]
[4]王 瑶,陈 慧,林 莉,等.重大传染病一级预检分诊持续质量控制[J].医学信息,2021,34(01):134.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.01.036]
　WANG Yao,CHEN Hui,LIN Li,et al.Continuous Quality Control of First-level Pre-Examination and Triage of Serious Infectious Diseases[J].Medical Information,2021,34(07):134.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.01.036]
[5]汪蓓蕾,侯秉璋,郭 刚.Westgard西格玛规则和生物学变异确定的质量规范在新生儿筛查项目中的应用[J].医学信息,2022,35(02):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.02.025]
　WANG Bei-lei,HOU Bing-zhang,GUO Gang.Application of Westgard Sigma Rules and Quality Criteria for Biological Variantsin Neonatal Screening Projects[J].Medical Information,2022,35(07):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.02.025]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-01