[1]呼廷辉,王 颖,蔡 涛,等.mPCNL与RPLU治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(20):60-64，68.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.017]
　HU Ting-hui,WANG Ying,CAI Tao,et al.Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of mPCNL and RPLU in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Incarcerated Calculi[J].Medical Information,2020,33(20):60-64，68.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.017]
点击复制

mPCNL与RPLU治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石疗效及安全性的Meta分析()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年20期
页码:
60-64，68
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2020-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of mPCNL and RPLU in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Incarcerated Calculi
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）20-0060-06
作者:
呼廷辉; 王 颖; 蔡 涛; 等
（1.川北医学院附属医院泌尿外科，四川 南充 637000； 2.宜宾市第一人民医院，四川 宜宾 644000）
Author(s):
HU Ting-hui; WANG Ying; CAI Tao; et al
(1.Department of Urology,the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College,Nanchong637000,Sichuan,China; 2.the First People’s Hospital of Yibin City,Yibin644000,Sichuan,China)
关键词:
输尿管结石; 微创经皮肾镜碎石术; 经腹膜后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术
Keywords:
Ureteral stones; Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterectomy
分类号:
R693+.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 系统评价微创经皮肾镜碎石术（mPCNL）与经腹膜后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术（RPLU）治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石疗效及安全性。方法 计算机检索PubMed、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、CBM数据库、WangFang数据库、CNKI数据库和维普数据库，搜集mPCNL与RPLU治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石疗效及安全性的随机对照试验（RCT），检索时间为建库至2019年10月。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后，采用Review Manager 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入9篇RCT，包括2篇英文及7篇中文RCT，共纳入1192例患者。Meta分析显示：RPLU术后3 d结石清除率（RR=0.97，95%CI：0.94~1.00）、术中失血量（MD=39.32，95%CI：5.57~73.08）、术后发热率（RR=2.24，95%CI：1.14~4.41）及术后出血发生率（RR=5.63，95%CI：1.36~23.24）均优于mPCNL，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；mPCNL与RPLU在手术时间（MD=-5.74，95%CI：-16.90~5.42）、术后继发性输尿管狭窄率（RR=2.76，95%CI：0.69~11.06）方面比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 与mPCNL比较，RPLU为治疗输尿管上段嵌顿结石的一种相对安全、有效的术式，可作为治疗输尿管上段嵌顿结石的优选术式。
Abstract:
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterectomy (RPLU) in the treatment of upper ureteral incarcerated calculi.Methods Computer searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM database, WangFang database, CNKI database and Weipu database, and collected randomized controlled trials (RCT) on the efficacy and safety of mPCNL and RPLU in the treatment of upper ureteral incarcerated calculi. The search time was from the establishment of the database to October 2019. After two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies, the Review Manager 5.3 software was used for Meta analysis.Results A total of 9 RCTs were included, including 2 English and 7 Chinese RCTs, and a total of 1192 patients were enrolled. Meta-analysis shows: 3 d stone clearance rate after RPLU(RR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.94~1.00), intraoperative blood loss (MD=39.32, 95%CI: 5.57~73.08), postoperative fever rate (RR=2.24, 95%CI: 1.14~4.41) and the incidence of postoperative bleeding (RR=5.63, 95%CI: 1.36~23.24) was better than mPCNL, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); mPCNL and RPLU were in operation time (MD=-5.74, 95%CI: -16.90~5.42) and the rate of postoperative secondary ureteral stenosis (RR=2.76, 95%CI: 0.69-11.06), the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with mPCNL, RPLU was a relatively safe and effective procedure for the treatment of upper ureteral incarcerated calculi, and it could be used as the optimal procedure for upper ureteral incarcerated calculi.

参考文献/References:

[1]Türk C,Petrík A,Sarica K,et al.EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis[J].European Urology,2016,69(3):475-482. [2]孙颖浩,那彦群,叶章群.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2014. [3]Deng T,Chen Y,Liu B,et al.Systematic review and cumulative analysis of the managements for proximal impacted ureteral stones[J].World Journal of Urology,2019,37(8):1687-1701. [4]Tugcu V,Resorlu B,Sahin S,et al.Flexible Ureteroscopy versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones >15 mm:A Single Surgeon Experience[J].Urol Int,2016,96(1):77-82. [5]Zhang Y,Wei C,Pokhrel G,et al.Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Ureter Catheter:A Safe and Effective form of mPCNL Offers Better Quality of Life[J].Urol Int,2019,102(2):160-166. [6]Moher D,Shamseer L,Clarke M,et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols(PRISMA-P)2015 statement[J].Syst Rev,2015(4):1. [7]陈兴发.泌尿系结石诊疗指南解读[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2010,15(6):408-410. [8]Liu Y,Zhou Z,Xia A,et al.Clinical observation of different minimally invasive surgeries for the treatmentof impacted upper ureteral calculi[J].Pak J Med Sci,2013,29(6):1358-1362. [9]伍季,李云祥,范俊,等.嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的两种微创治疗方法对比研究[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2011,16(4):328-331. [10]陈书尚,朱凌峰,杨顺良,等.后腹腔镜、经皮肾镜和输尿管镜手术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2012,27(1):5-7,11. [11]孙成亮,甘伟,张少峰,等.内镜下不同术式治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的对比研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2014,20(5):540-543. [12]程红刚.不同微创手术方法治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效对比[J].黑龙江医学,2014(6):644-646. [13]肖峰,周传贵,徐宗华,等.3种微创术式治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石[J].贵阳医学院学报,2015,40(9):985-987, 990. [14]Wang Y,Zhong B,Yang X,et al.Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL,RPLU,and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones:A randomized controlled trial[J].BMC Urology,2017,17(1):50. [15]陈立宽,杨连再,段李军,等.经后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效观察[J].中国医疗器械信息,2018,24(6):69-70. [16]李晶磊,马宇杰.腹膜后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石患者的疗效及安全性分析[J].现代诊断与治疗,2019,30(13):2248-2249. [17]Gdor Y,Gabr A H,Faerber G J,et al.Success of Laser Endoureterotomy of Ureteral Strictures Associated with Ureteral Stones Is Related to Stone Impaction[J].Journal of Endourology,2008,22(11):2507-2512. [18]Li H,Na W,Li H,et al.Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Ureteroscopic Lithotomy for Large(＞15 mm)Impacted Upper Ureteral Stones in Different Locations:Is the Upper Border of the Fourth Lumbar Vertebra a Good Indication for Choice of Management Method[J].Journal of Endourology,2013,27(9):1120-1125. [19]Hennessey DB,Kinnear NK,Troy A,et al.Mini PCNL for renal calculi: does size matter[J].BJU Int,2017,119(Suppl 5):39-46. [20]Skrepetis K,Doumas K,Siafakas I,et al.Laparoscopic versus open ureterolithotomy.A comparative study[J].Eur Urol,2001,40(1):32-37. [21]Wang K,Wang G,Shi H,et al.Analysis of the clinical effect and long-term follow-up results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of complicated upper ureteral calculi(report of 206 cases followed for 10 years)[J].International Urology and Nephrology,2019,51(11):1955-1960. [22]Matlaga BR,Jansen JP,Meckley LM,et al.Treatment of Ureteral and Renal Stones:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized,Controlled Trials[J].Journal of Urology,2012,188(1):130-137. [23]Bostanci Y,Ozden E,Atac F,et al.The double wire technique: an alternative method for difficult ureteroscopic access[J].Urol Res,2012,40(6):783-784. [24]Shao Y,Wang DW,Lu GL,et al.Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in comparison with ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones larger than 12 mm[J].World J Urol,2015,33(11):1841-1845. [25]Cheng F,Yu W,Zhang X,et al.Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones[J].J Endourol,2010,24(10):1579-1582.

相似文献/References:

[1]江宏飞.经输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石的临床效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(04):111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.038]
　JIANG Hong-fei.Clinical Effect of Pneumatic Lithotripsy through Ureteroscope in the Treatment of Ureteral Calculi[J].Medical Information,2018,31(20):111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.038]
[2]彭 瑛.综合护理干预对输尿管结石URSL术后 治疗效果的影响分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(09):172.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.09.057]
　PENG Ying.Analysis of the Effect of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention on Ureteral Calculi after URSL Procedure[J].Medical Information,2018,31(20):172.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.09.057]
[3]黄东亮,思建民.MSCT非增强扫描在输尿管结石诊断中的应用[J].医学信息,2018,31(15):148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.048]
　HUANG Dong-liang,SI Jian-min.Application of MSCT Non-enhanced Scanning in Diagnosis of Kidney and Ureter Calculi[J].Medical Information,2018,31(20):148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.048]
[4]苟险峰.不同手术方式治疗输尿管结石的效果分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(17):92.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.028]
　GOU Xian-feng.Analysis of the Effect of Different Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Ureteral Calculi[J].Medical Information,2018,31(20):92.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.028]
[5]王振宇,陈 军.输尿管结石术后双J管留置时间的比较分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(19):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.19.031]
　WANG Zhen-yu,CHEN Jun.Comparative Analysis of Indwelling Time of Double J Tube after Ureteral Calculi[J].Medical Information,2018,31(20):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.19.031]
[6]郑少凯,张长椿,张 舟.超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞在上段输尿管结石切开取石术中的应用[J].医学信息,2021,34(04):142.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.04.038]
　ZHENG Shao-kai,ZHANG Chang-chun,ZHANG Zhou.Application of Ultrasound-guided Paravertebral Nerve Block in the Upper Ureteral Stone Incision and Removal[J].Medical Information,2021,34(20):142.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.04.038]
[7]徐亚伟.经输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石的效果[J].医学信息,2019,32(23):117.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.23.033]
　XU Ya-wei.Treatment of Ureteral Calculi with Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy[J].Medical Information,2019,32(20):117.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.23.033]
[8]刘 睿.输尿管镜钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效比较[J].医学信息,2019,32(24):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.24.040]
　LIU Rui.Comparison of Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Ureteral Calculi[J].Medical Information,2019,32(20):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.24.040]
[9]厉莎莎,赵 炎,梁 杰,等.输尿管镜同期治疗双侧输尿管结石清石率分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(09):180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.09.058]
　LI Sha-sha,ZHAO Yan,LIANG Jie,et al.Analysis of Clearing Rate of Ureteroscopy for Bilateral Ureteral Stones[J].Medical Information,2020,33(20):180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.09.058]
[10]王春力,李雨根,邓显忠,等.输尿管镜碎石术术前应用坦索罗辛辅助治疗有效性的Meta分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(19):68.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.19.020]
　WANG Chun-li,LI Yu-gen,DENG Xian-zhong,et al.Meta Analysis of the Effectiveness of Tamsulosin Adjuvant Treatment Before Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy[J].Medical Information,2020,33(20):68.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.19.020]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01