[1]陈 炜,周林路,叶 刚,等.鼻内窥镜鼻窦开放手术中切除与保留中鼻甲对手术效果的影响[J].医学信息,2020,33(20):83-85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.023]
　CHEN Wei,ZHOU Lin-lu,YE Gang,et al.Effect of Removal and Preservation of Middle Turbinate During Open Sinus Surgery Under Nasal Endoscopic Sinus Surgery[J].Medical Information,2020,33(20):83-85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.023]
点击复制

鼻内窥镜鼻窦开放手术中切除与保留中鼻甲对手术效果的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年20期
页码:
83-85
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Removal and Preservation of Middle Turbinate During Open Sinus Surgery Under Nasal Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）20-0083-03
作者:
陈 炜; 周林路; 叶 刚; 等
（乐山市人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科，四川 乐山 614000）
Author(s):
CHEN Wei; ZHOU Lin-lu; YE Gang; et al
(Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,Leshan People’s Hospital,Leshan 614000,Sichuan,China)
关键词:
慢性鼻－鼻窦炎; 中鼻甲; 鼻内镜手术
Keywords:
Chronic rhinosinusitis; Middle turbinate; Endoscopic sinus surgery
分类号:
R765.7
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.023
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察鼻内窥镜鼻窦开放手术中鼻甲不同的处理方式对手术效果的影响。方法 选取2018年1~12月在乐山市人民医院诊断为慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的165例（232侧）患者，采用随机数字表法分为保留中鼻甲组82例和切除中鼻甲组83例，术后随访6个月以上，采用Lund-Kennedy鼻内镜评分法，视觉模拟量表（VAS）评分和鼻腔鼻窦结局测试-20中文版（SNOT-20CV）比较两组的疗效。结果 保留中鼻甲组手术治疗总有效率86.58%，切除中鼻甲组手术治疗总有效率83.13%，两组疗效比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），两组术后VAS评分、SNOT-20CV评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 鼻内窥镜鼻窦开放手术中切除与保留中鼻甲两种不同术式对患者的治疗效果的影响无明显差异，提示切除大部分中鼻甲并不会降低手术疗效及患者主观症状，临床工作中应该根据患者的具体情况对中鼻甲进行处理，尽可能切除中鼻甲的病变组织，解除中鼻道阻塞因素，提高手术效果。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the effect of different treatments of the turbinate in the open sinus surgery under nasal endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods 165 patients (232 sides) diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis in Leshan People’s Hospital from January to December 2018 were selected and divided into 82 cases in the middle turbinate retention group and 83 cases in the middle turbinate removal group by random number table method. Follow-up for more than 6 months after operation, Lund-Kennedy nasal endoscopy score, visual analog scale (VAS) score and nasal cavity and sinus outcome test-20 Chinese version (SNOT-20CV) were used to compare the efficacy of the two groups.Results The total effective rate of surgical treatment in the middle turbinate-preserving group was 86.58%, and the total effective rate of surgical treatment in the middle turbinate-removing group was 83.13%,there was no significant difference in curative effect between the two groups (P>0.05). The postoperative VAS score and SNOT-20CV of the two groups the score comparison showed no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).Conclusion There was no significant difference in the effect of the two different surgical methods of removal and preservation of the middle turbinate during open sinus surgery under nasal endoscopic sinus surgery. It suggested that removing most of the middle turbinate would not reduce the surgical efficacy and subjective symptoms of patients. The middle turbinate should be treated according to the specific conditions of the patient, and the diseased tissue of the middle turbinate should be removed as much as possible to remove the obstructive factors of the middle nasal passage and improve the surgical effect.

参考文献/References:

[1]Wang XD,Zheng M,Lou HF,et al.An increased prevalence of self-reported allergic rhinitis in major Chinese cities from 2005 to 2011[J].Allergy,2016,71(8):1170-1180. [2]Aklyama K,Samukawa Y,Takahashi S,et al.Clinical effects of submucosal middle turbinectomy for eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis[J].Auris Nasus Larynx,2018,45(4):765-771. [3]李雪盛.中鼻甲切除对功能性鼻内镜手术临床疗效的研究进展[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2015,21(5):432-434. [4]Byun JY,Lee JY.Middle turbinate resection versus preservation in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis accompanying nasal polypo-sis:baseline disease burden and surgical outcomes between the groups[J].J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2012,41(4):259-264. [5]中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会鼻科组,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组.中国慢性鼻窦炎诊断和治疗指南(2018)[S].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2019,54(2):81-95. [6]左可军,方积乾,Piccirillo JF,等.鼻腔鼻窦结局测试-20(SNOT-20)量表中文版的研制[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2008,21(5):751-756. [7]张宏,翟淼,于朝阳.窦口鼻道复合体解剖变异与鼻窦炎相关性的 MSCT 研究[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2015,26(7):457-460. [8]Pinther S,Deeb R,Peterson EL,et al.Complications Are Rare From Middle Turbinate Resection:A Prospective Case Series[J].Am J Rhinol Allergy,2019,33(6):657-664. [9]Hudon MA,Wright ED,Fortin-Pellerin E,et al.Resection versus preservation of the middle turbinate in surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis:a randomized controlled trial[J].Journal of Otolaryngology-Head&Neck Surgery,2018,47(1):67. [10]赵春雷,杨维.鼻内镜下中鼻甲不同术式对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉患者的影响分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2015,21(1):46-49. [11]Belcher RH,keda AK,Delgaudio JM.Remodeling of the paradoxicial middle turbinate:Preserving function while gaining access[J].American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy,2018,32(2):98-100. [12]张罗.展望慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉的精准治疗[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2017,52(2):81-84.

相似文献/References:

[1]罗文广,童 敏,张克春,等.修正性鼻内镜手术治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎鼻内镜术后复发的处理措施研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(23):183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.23.054]
　LUO Wen-guang,TONG Min,ZHANG Ke-chun,et al.Treatment of Recurrence of Chronic Rhino-sinusitisafter Endoscopic Surgery by Modified Endoscopic Sinus Surgery[J].Medical Information,2018,31(20):183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.23.054]
[2]鲍爱春,刘芳英,朱静静,等.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎与支气管哮喘变应原特征分析[J].医学信息,2021,34(09):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.09.021]
　BAO Ai-chun,LIU Fang-ying,ZHU Jing-jing,et al.Analysis of Allergen Characteristics of Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Bronchial Asthma[J].Medical Information,2021,34(20):81.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.09.021]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01