[1]文 韬,周稳健,郑春旸,等.腔内置管负压引流术治疗高位肛周脓肿的效果及对创面愈合的影响[J].医学信息,2021,34(03):131-133.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.03.036]
　WEN Tao,ZHOU Wen-jian,ZHENG Chun-yang,et al.Effect of Negative Pressure Drainage with Intracavitary Tube on High Perianal Abscess and Its Influence on Wound Healing[J].Medical Information,2021,34(03):131-133.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.03.036]
点击复制

腔内置管负压引流术治疗高位肛周脓肿的效果及对创面愈合的影响()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年03期
页码:
131-133
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-02-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Negative Pressure Drainage with Intracavitary Tube on High Perianal Abscess and Its Influence on Wound Healing
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）03-0131-03
作者:
文 韬; 周稳健; 郑春旸; 等
（1.佳木斯大学临床医学院，黑龙江 佳木斯 154000； 2.齐齐哈尔市第一医院肛肠科，黑龙江 齐齐哈尔 161000）
Author(s):
WEN Tao; ZHOU Wen-jian; ZHENG Chun-yang; et al.
(1.School of Clinical Medicine,Jiamusi University,Jiamusi 154000,Heilongjiang,China; 2.Department of Anorectal,Qiqihar First Hospital,Qiqihar 161000,Heilongjiang,China)
关键词:
负压引流术; 肛周脓肿; 临床效果; 切开挂线法; 腔内置管; 创面愈合
Keywords:
Negative pressure drainage; Perianal abscess; Clinical effect; Incision and thread-drawing method; Intraluminal tube; Wound healing
分类号:
R657.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.03.036
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨腔内置管负压引流术治疗高位肛周脓肿的效果及对创面愈合的影响。方法 选择2019年1月~2020年1月我院收治的70例高位肛周脓肿患者作为研究对象，根据治疗方法不同分为对照组30例和观察组40例。对照组采用传统的切开挂线法治疗，观察组采用腔内置管负压引流术治疗，比较两组手术情况（手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间及创面愈合时间）、临床疗效、疼痛程度（VAS评分）、手术前及手术后1天血清白细胞、TNF-α、IL-6及C反应蛋白（CRP）水平。结果 观察组治疗总有效率为87.50%，高于对照组的73.33%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组手术时间比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；观察组术中出血量、住院时间、创面愈合时间少于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组轻度疼痛、中度疼痛患者多于对照组，重度疼痛患者少于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；治疗后两组血清白细胞、TNF-α、IL-6及CRP水平较治疗前降低，且观察组低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 与传统的切开挂线法相比，腔内置管负压引流术治疗高位肛周脓肿临床疗效较高，患者疼痛程度轻，手术切口小，术后创面愈合快，住院时间少，感染控制程度快。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effect of negative pressure drainage with endoluminal tube in the treatment of high perianal abscess and its influence on wound healing.Methods 70 patients with high perianal abscesses admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were selected as the research objects. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into control group with 30 cases and observation group with 40 cases. The control group was treated with the traditional incision and thread-drawing method, and the observation group was treated with negative pressure drainage with an internal tube. Compare the two groups of surgery (operating time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay and wound healing time), clinical efficacy, pain degree (VAS score),Serum white blood cell, TNF-α, IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels before and 1 day after surgery.Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 87.50%, which was higher than 73.33% in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);There was no statistically significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P>0.05);The amount of blood loss, hospital stay, and wound healing time in the observation group were less than those in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);There were more patients with mild pain and moderate pain in the observation group than in the control group, and fewer patients with severe pain than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);After treatment, the levels of serum white blood cells, TNF-α, IL-6 and CRP in the two groups were lower than before treatment, and the observation group was lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with the traditional incision and thread-drawing method, the negative pressure drainage with the endoluminal tube has a higher clinical effect in the treatment of high perianal abscess. The patient has low pain, small surgical incision, quick postoperative wound healing, short hospital stay, and quick infection control.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘立涛,肖遵福,隋英英.主灶切开治疗肛周脓肿根治术研究[C]//中华中医药学会.中华中医药学会肛肠分会2015年学术年会暨全国流调行业发布会论文集.2015:1004-1006. [2]武佰锁,郭君毅,王锦波.婴幼儿肛周脓肿及肛瘘治疗研究进展[J].人民军医,2018,61(3):278-280,286. [3]毛敏,钟华.肛周脓肿手术治疗的不同方式对患者疗效及生活质量的影响[J].基因组学与应用生物学,2018,37(5):2194-2199. [4]毛玲娟,郑雪平.肛周脓肿的非手术治疗研究进展[J].湖南中医杂志,2018,34(5):207-209. [5]钟武,张磊昌,钟世彪,等.腔内置管负压引流术治疗高位多间隙肛周脓肿的效果[J].广东医学,2015,36(2):290-292. [6]刘晓彬,郭文涛,曾智辉.低位开窗旷置术和低位切开高位挂线术治疗高位肛周脓肿的疗效比较[J].中国医学创新,2017,14(17):136-139. [7]文小军.负压创面治疗技术在肛周脓肿中的应用进展[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2017,37(9):63-65. [8]陈若愚,庄华章,李家冰,等.负压封闭引流治疗高位肛周脓肿的临床研究[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2017,20(6):471-473. [9]曹影.肛周脓肿检测中外周血C反应蛋白、纤维蛋白原含量对其诊治的临床意义[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2019,39(1):19-20.

相似文献/References:

[1]卢 冰,汪昭民,李 洁,等.1例HIV感染并发肛周脓肿者治疗的分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(07):187.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.07.061]
[2]毕宪坤.加味苦参汤熏洗治疗肛周脓肿术后患者的效果[J].医学信息,2019,32(16):155.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.16.052]
　BI Xian-kun.Effect of Jiawei Kushen Decoction In the Treatment of Postoperative Patients with Perianal Abscess[J].Medical Information,2019,32(03):155.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.16.052]
[3]邓云华.手术联合康复新液治疗肛周脓肿的疗效[J].医学信息,2019,32(22):150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.21.051]
　DENG Yun-hua.Therapeutic Effect of Combined Surgery and Rehabilitation Fluid on Perianal Abscess[J].Medical Information,2019,32(03):150.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.21.051]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01