[1]蔡 华,何菊仙,赵海霞,等.HIFU与手术治疗腹壁子宫内膜异位症的疗效比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(05):78-80.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.05.022]
　CAI hua,HE Ju-xian,ZHAO Hai-xia,et al.Comparison of the Effect of HIFU and Surgery in the Treatment of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis[J].Medical Information,2021,34(05):78-80.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.05.022]
点击复制

HIFU与手术治疗腹壁子宫内膜异位症的疗效比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年05期
页码:
78-80
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the Effect of HIFU and Surgery in the Treatment of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）05-0078-03
作者:
蔡 华; 何菊仙; 赵海霞; 等
（1.西安医学院研究生处，陕西 西安 710021； 2.西北妇女儿童医院妇三科，陕西 西安 710061）
Author(s):
CAI hua; HE Ju-xian; ZHAO Hai-xia; et al.
(1.Graduate School,Xi’an Medical University,Xi’an 710021,Shaanxi,China; 2.Subject Three,Department of Gynecology,Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital,Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi,China)
关键词:
腹壁子宫内膜异位症; 高强度聚焦超声; 疼痛; 微创
Keywords:
Abdominal wall endometriosis;  High-intensity focused ultrasound;  Pain;  Minimally invasive
分类号:
R730.41
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.05.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察高强度聚焦超声（HIFU）与手术切除治疗腹壁子宫内膜异位症（AWE）的疗效，探讨AWE微创有效的治疗方法。方法 收集2016年6月~2019年6月就诊于我院的AWE患者59例，根据治疗方式不同分为HIFU组（n=29）和手术组（n=30），分析HIFU治疗情况，比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术中伤及肌肉层、住院总天数、术后住院天数、手术前后病灶直径变化、疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）、药物干预率、并发症及复发情况。结果 HIFU组29例患者均顺利完成治疗，消融辐照总时间为（453.04±191.03）s，治疗功率为（116.79±61.51）W，治疗总能量为（50831.79±25861.18）J。治疗后有27例患者（93.10%）出现团块状灰度变化，2例患者出现整体灰度变化。HIFU消融术中无出血量及肌肉层损伤，与手术组比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；HIFU组手术时间长于手术组，住院总天数及术后住院时间均短于手术组（P＜0.05），治疗后两组VAS评分较治疗前降低（P＜0.05），但组间比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；HIFU组术后6个月的病灶直径为（5.15±6.38）mm，大于手术组的0（P＜0.05）；HIFU组术后6个月病灶直径较术前缩小77.61%，其中3例患者病灶完全消失；HIFU组并发症总发生率、药物干预率均低于手术组（P＜0.05）；HIFU组复发率为0，低于手术组的3.33%，但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 与手术切除相比，HIFU治疗腹壁子宫内膜异位症微创、有效、恢复时间短、并发症少，值得应用。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and surgical resection in the treatment of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE), and explore the minimally invasive and effective treatment methods of AWE.Methods A total of 59 AWE patients treated in our hospital from June 2016 to June 2019 were collected and divided into HIFU group (n=29) and surgery group (n=30) according to different treatment methods. The treatment of HIFU was analyzed and the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative injury and muscle layer, total length of hospital stay, postoperative length of hospital stay, changes of lesion diameter before and after operation, visual analogue scale (VAS), drug intervention rate,complications and recurrence were compared between the two groups.Results In HIFU group, the total time of ablation was (453.04 ± 191.03) s, the power was (116.79±61.51) W, and the total energy was (50831.79±25861.18) J. After treatment, 27 patients (93.10%) had massive gray changes, and 2 patients had overall gray changes. There was no blood loss and muscle layer injury during HIFU ablation, and the difference was statistically significant compared with the operation group (P＜0.05); the operation time of HIFU group was longer, the total hospital stay and postoperative hospital stay of the operation group were shorter than those of the operation group (P＜0.05), After treatment, the VAS scores of the two groups were lower than before treatment(P＜0.05).However, there was no significant difference between the two groups after treatment (P＞0.05); The diameter of the lesion in the HIFU group at 6 months after operation was (5.15±6.38) mm, which was larger than 0 in the operation group (P＜0.05);The average diameter of the lesions in the HIFU group was reduced by 77.61% compared with the preoperative 6 months after the operation, and the lesions disappeared completely in 3 patients; the total incidence of complications and drug intervention rate in the HIFU group was lower than surgery group (P＜0.05);The recurrence rate in the HIFU group was 0, which was lower than 3.33% in the surgery group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P＞0.05).Conclusion Compared with surgical resection, HIFU treatment of abdominal wall endometriosis is minimally invasive, effective, has a shorter recovery time and fewer complications, and is worthy of application.

参考文献/References:

[1]胡尚英,彭松,王智彪.腹壁子宫内膜异位症的诊疗进展[J].中国微创外科杂志,2015,15(2):182-184. [2]郭清,丁珍珍,徐锋,等.高强度聚焦超声在妇科疾病中的应用[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2016,8(10):28-31. [3]Grigore M,Socolov D,Pavaleanu I,et al.Abdominal wall endometriosis:an update in clinical,imagistic features,and management options[J].Medical Ultrasonography,2017,19(4):430-437. [4]Marras S,Pluchino N,Petignat P,et al.Abdominal wall endometriosis:An 11-year retrospective observational cohort study[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X,2019(4):100096. [5]Zhao L,Deng Y,Wei Q,et al.Comparison of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and surgery for abdominal wall endometriosis[J].Int J Hyperthermia,2018,35(1):528-533. [6]徐丛剑,华克勤.实用妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:726-735. [7]黄艳,彭超,徐海燕.腹壁子宫内膜异位症179例诊治分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2019(4):312-316. [8]蒋梦雨,李留霞,朱迎.腹壁子宫内膜异位症231例临床特点及诊治预后分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2020(4):361-364. [9]Huber M,Grosel J,Showen C.Recognizing abdominal wall endometriosis[J].JAAPA,2019,32(7):30-33. [10]Rindos NB,Mansuria S.Diagnosis and Management of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis:A Systematic Review and Clinical Recommendations[J].Obstet Gynecol Surv,2017,72(2):116-122. [11]张平,孙亚兵,陈正云,等.腹壁子宫内膜异位症121例临床研究[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2016,36(10):1463-1466. [12]Shi S,Ni G,Ling L,et al.High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the Treatment of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis[J].Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology,2020,27(3):704-711. [13]何玉春,罗爽,黄国华,等.聚焦超声消融治疗子宫良性疾病不良反应分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2020,36(3):272-275.

相似文献/References:

[1]江书碧,胡 红,许芙蓉,等.高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤与腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术的比较[J].医学信息,2019,32(09):98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.09.031]
　JIANG Shu-bi,HU Hong,XU Fu-rong,et al.Comparison of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids and Laparoscopic Myomectomy[J].Medical Information,2019,32(05):98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.09.031]
[2]张 彬,齐红梅,王红燕,等.高强度聚焦超声联合清宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效[J].医学信息,2020,33(06):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.06.035]
　ZHANG Bin,QI Hong-mei,WANG Hong-yan,et al.Efficacy of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Combined with Uterine Hysterectomy in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy[J].Medical Information,2020,33(05):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.06.035]
[3]冯 欣,窦 曦,沈庆波.高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫腺肌瘤消融率的影响因素分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(20):91.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.026]
　FENG Xin,DOU Xi,SHEN Qing-bo.Analysis of Factors Affecting the Ablation Rate of Uterine Adenomyoma Treated by High-intensity Focused Ultrasound[J].Medical Information,2020,33(05):91.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.026]
[4]王 斌,薛莉君,方青波,等.高强度聚焦超声无创闭合新西兰兔隐静脉的有效性和安全性[J].医学信息,2021,34(18):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.18.026]
　WANG Bin,XUE Li-jun,FANG Qing-bo,et al.Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound for Non-invasive Closure of theSaphenous Vein in New Zealand Rabbits[J].Medical Information,2021,34(05):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.18.026]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01