[1]冯 欣,窦 曦,沈庆波.高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫腺肌瘤消融率的影响因素分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(20):91-93.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.026]
 FENG Xin,DOU Xi,SHEN Qing-bo.Analysis of Factors Affecting the Ablation Rate of Uterine Adenomyoma Treated by High-intensity Focused Ultrasound[J].Medical Information,2020,33(20):91-93.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.026]
点击复制

高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫腺肌瘤消融率的影响因素分析()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年20期
页码:
91-93
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of Factors Affecting the Ablation Rate of Uterine Adenomyoma Treated by High-intensity Focused Ultrasound
文章编号:
1006-1959(2020)20-0091-03
作者:
冯 欣窦 曦沈庆波
(四川省乐山市人民医院妇产科,四川 乐山 614000)
Author(s):
FENG XinDOU XiSHEN Qing-bo
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,People’s Hospital of Leshan City,Leshan614000, Sichuan,China)
关键词:
高强度聚焦超声子宫腺肌瘤消融率影响因素
Keywords:
High intensity focused ultrasoundAdenomyoma of uterusAblation rateInfluencing factors
分类号:
R737.33;R454.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.026
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨影响高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫腺肌瘤消融率的相关因素。方法 选取我院2018年1~12月因子宫腺肌瘤进行高强度聚焦超声治疗的77例患者作为研究对象,计算治疗消融率,根据治疗消融率分为A、B两组,A组(消融率>50%)患者55例,B组(消融率≤50%)患者22例,比较两组临床及随访资料,分析影响子宫腺肌瘤消融率的相关因素。结果 单因素分析显示,不同肌瘤位置、年龄、是否出现团块、腹壁瘢痕、腺肌瘤位置的患者子宫腺肌瘤消融率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);不同肿瘤直径、治疗强度的子宫腺肌瘤消融率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);多因素回归分析显示,消融率与肌瘤直径、治疗强度密切相关,肌瘤位置对消融率也有一定的影响,而年龄、是否出现团块、腹壁瘢痕、腺肌瘤位置均对子宫腺肌瘤消融率无影响。结论 子宫腺肌瘤的治疗强度、大小、位置均会对消融产生影响,对相关因素进行干预能够提高消融率,从而改善治疗效果。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the related factors affecting the ablation rate of uterine adenomyoma treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound. Methods 77 patients who underwent high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for adenomyoma from January to December 2018 in our hospital were selected as the research object, and the treatment ablation rate was calculated. According to the treatment ablation rate, they were divided into two groups A and B,there were 55 patients in group A (ablation rate> 50%) and 22 patients in group B (ablation rate ≤ 50%). The clinical and follow-up data of the two groups were compared, and related factors affecting the ablation rate of adenomyoma were analyzed.Results Univariate analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the ablation rate of adenomyoma among patients with different fibroids, age, mass, abdominal wall scars, and adenomyoma locations (P>0.05); different tumor diameters,comparison of the ablation rate of uterine adenomyoma with treatment intensity was statistically significant(P<0.05); multivariate regression analysis showed that the ablation rate was closely related to the diameter of the fibroids and the treatment intensity, and the location of the fibroids also has a certain influence on the ablation rate,however,age, presence of masses, abdominal wall scars, and adenomyoma location had no effect on the ablation rate of adenomyoma.Conclusion The treatment intensity, size and location of uterine adenomyoma would affect the ablation. Intervention of related factors could increase the ablation rate and improve the treatment effect.

参考文献/References:

[1]Valtot F,Kopel J,Haut J.Treatment of glaucoma with high intensityfocused ultrasound[J].International Journal of Hyper-thermia,2015,93(3):831-838. [2]范华平,杜卫杰,刘瑞振,等.高强度聚焦超声治疗系统治疗子宫腺肌瘤的临床效果[J].临床误诊误治,2016,29(5):81-83. [3]杨秀梅,朱丽华,时玲玲,等.高强度聚焦超声治疗治疗子宫腺肌瘤的临床疗效观察[J].西部医学,2017,29(11):1551-1554. [4]刘欣,汪伟,王旸,等.聚焦超声消融治疗子宫腺肌病的中远期疗效观察[J].中华妇产科杂志,2015,50(12):944-946. [5]祝宝让,杨武威,李静,等.高强度聚焦超声消融子宫肌瘤疗效相关因素分析[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(2):374-377. [6]陈刚,何红霞.腹腔镜全子宫并双侧输卵管切除术对绝经后妇女卵巢功能的影响[J].空军医学杂志,2016,32(3):185-188. [7]宋丹.探讨超声消融与腹腔镜手术治疗子宫肌瘤的临床对比研究[J].中国医药指南,2016,14(30):159-159. [8]徐亚萍,刘香环,王海丽.高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫腺肌病影响因素的初步分析[J].中国中西医结合影像学杂志,2016,14(6):669-671. [9]郭琳茹,焦伟,代维,等.腹腔镜保守手术治疗与高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫腺肌瘤对患者生活质量的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2018,33(18):4312-4314.

相似文献/References:

[1]江书碧,胡 红,许芙蓉,等.高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤与腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术的比较[J].医学信息,2019,32(09):98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.09.031]
 JIANG Shu-bi,HU Hong,XU Fu-rong,et al.Comparison of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids and Laparoscopic Myomectomy[J].Medical Information,2019,32(20):98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.09.031]
[2]张 彬,齐红梅,王红燕,等.高强度聚焦超声联合清宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效[J].医学信息,2020,33(06):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.06.035]
 ZHANG Bin,QI Hong-mei,WANG Hong-yan,et al.Efficacy of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Combined with Uterine Hysterectomy in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy[J].Medical Information,2020,33(20):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.06.035]
[3]蔡 华,何菊仙,赵海霞,等.HIFU与手术治疗腹壁子宫内膜异位症的疗效比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(05):78.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.05.022]
 CAI hua,HE Ju-xian,ZHAO Hai-xia,et al.Comparison of the Effect of HIFU and Surgery in the Treatment of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis[J].Medical Information,2021,34(20):78.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.05.022]
[4]王 斌,薛莉君,方青波,等.高强度聚焦超声无创闭合新西兰兔隐静脉的有效性和安全性[J].医学信息,2021,34(18):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.18.026]
 WANG Bin,XUE Li-jun,FANG Qing-bo,et al.Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound for Non-invasive Closure of theSaphenous Vein in New Zealand Rabbits[J].Medical Information,2021,34(20):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.18.026]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01