[1]徐 飞,廖子聪,汤治平.经口腔前庭入路与全乳晕入路腔镜单侧良性肿瘤切除术的比较研究[J].医学信息,2021,34(07):131-133.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.07.036]
　XU Fei,LIAO Zi-cong,TANG Zhi-ping.A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Unilateral Benign Tumor Resection Through Oral Vestibular Approach and Full Areola Approach[J].Medical Information,2021,34(07):131-133.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.07.036]
点击复制

经口腔前庭入路与全乳晕入路腔镜单侧良性肿瘤切除术的比较研究()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年07期
页码:
131-133
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-04-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Unilateral Benign Tumor Resection Through Oral Vestibular Approach and Full Areola Approach
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）07-0131-03
作者:
徐 飞; 廖子聪; 汤治平
（南方医科大学附属中山市博爱医院普外科，广东 中山 528400）
Author(s):
XU Fei; LIAO Zi-cong; TANG Zhi-ping
(General Surgery,Zhongshan Boai Hospital,Southern Medical University,Zhongshan 528400,Guangdong,China)
关键词:
甲状腺肿瘤; 经口腔前庭腔镜; 甲状腺切除术
Keywords:
Thyroid neoplasms; Transoral vestibular endoscopy; Thyroidectomy
分类号:
R736.1；R730.56
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.07.036
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较经口腔前庭入路与全乳晕入路腔镜单侧良性肿瘤切除术临床效果。方法 回顾性分析2017年9月~2020年9月本院普外科行腔镜甲状腺手术的145例单侧良性甲状腺肿瘤患者的临床资料，其中经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺切除术68例设为口腔前庭组，全乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺切除术77例设为全乳晕组，比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后总引流量、术后第1天疼痛评分、住院费用、住院时间、术后满意度评分及术后并发症（喉返神经损伤、低钙血症、术后出血、创面感染）发生情况。结果 两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院费用、术后并发症发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；口腔前庭组患者术后总引流量、术后第1天疼痛评分及住院时间少于全乳晕组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；口腔前庭组满意度评分高于全乳晕组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺切除术在术后总引流量、术后第1天疼痛评分及住院时间方面优于全乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺切除术，且不会增加住院费用，手术安全可行，美容效果好，满意度评分较高。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effects of endoscopic unilateral benign tumor resection through oral vestibular approach and full areola approach.Methods The clinical data of 145 patients with unilateral benign thyroid tumors who underwent endoscopic thyroid surgery from September 2017 to September 2020 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed.Among them, 68 cases of endoscopic thyroidectomy through oral vestibular approach were set as the oral vestibular group, and 77 cases with total areola approach laparoscopic thyroidectomy were set as the total areola group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and total postoperative total were compared between the two groups. The number of cases of drainage, pain score on the first postoperative day, hospitalization cost, length of stay, postoperative satisfaction score, and postoperative complications (recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hypocalcemia, postoperative bleeding, wound infection).Results There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization expenses, and postoperative complication rate (P＞0.05);The total drainage, pain score and hospitalization time on the first day after the operation of the oral vestibule group were less than those of the full areola group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05);The satisfaction score of the oral vestibular group was higher than that of the full areola group,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic thyroidectomy via oral vestibular approach is superior to total areola approach in terms of total drainage, pain score on the first postoperative day and length of hospital stay, and does not increase hospitalization costs.The operation is safe and feasible, the cosmetic effect is good, and the satisfaction score is high.

参考文献/References:

[1]丁晖,孙鹏,潘运龙,等.经口腔前庭入路与完全乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺手术的对比研究[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2017,22(4):249-252. [2]Benhidjeb T,Wilhelm T,Harlaar J,et al.Natural orifice surgery on thyroid gland:totally transoral video-assisted thyroidectomy(TOVAT):report of first experimental results of a new surgical method[J].Surg Endosc,2009,23(5):1119-1120. [3]Nakajo A,Arima H,Hirata M,et al.Trans-Oral Video-Assisted Neck Surgery(TOVANS)A new transoral technique of endoscopic thyroidectomy with gasless pre-mandible approach[J].Surg Endosc,2013,27(4):1105-1110. [4]王超,李晓辉,张建, 等.腔镜甲状腺手术中经全乳晕入路和胸乳入路的临床效果比较[J].中国当代医药,2018,25(19):39-41. [5]王艺超,游薇,赵婉君,等.经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺切除术的研究进展[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2020,27(2):221-225. [6]王勇,谢秋萍,俞星,等.经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺手术150例临床分析[J].中华外科杂志,2017,55(8):587-591. [7]王平,吴国洋,田文,等.经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺手术专家共识(2018版)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2018,38(10):1104-1107. [8]Wang CC,Zhai HN,Liu WJ,et al.Thyroidectomy:anovel endoscopic oral vestibular approach[J].Surgery,2014,155(1):33-38. [9]丁光耀,王强,温鑫,等.腔镜甲状腺手术径路的研究进展[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2017,22(4):313-316. [10]苏远航,汤治平,丁自海,等.经口内镜甲状腺切除术及颈部淋巴结清扫术的人体标本手术实验研究[J].中华外科杂志,2013(6):552-555. [11]王存川,李诚.腔镜甲状腺手术入路与适应证的进展[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2016,21(4):241-245. [12]张姣,张大奇,薛高峰,等.经口入路腔镜甲状腺手术的发展、临床应用及展望[J].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2017,10(6):381-384. [13]武振,房居高.经口腔前庭腔镜甲状腺手术进展与争议[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2020,34(3):13-18. [14]吴国洋,林福生.经口入路腔镜技术在甲状腺癌治疗中的应用及操作技巧[J].国际外科学杂志,2018,45(12):793-796. [15]Anuwong A,Sasanakietkul T,Jitpratoom P,et al.Tran-soral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach(TOETVA):indications,techniques and results[J].Surg Endosc,2018,32(1):456-465.

相似文献/References:

[1]谢春燕.化学发光免疫分析法在甲状腺疾病诊断中的应用[J].医学信息,2019,32(16):169.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.16.058]
　XIE Chun-yan.Application of Chemiluminescence Immunoassay in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Diseases[J].Medical Information,2019,32(07):169.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.16.058]
[2]王小四.低位小切口与传统甲状腺手术治疗甲状腺良性肿瘤的效果比较[J].医学信息,2021,34(20):145.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.20.038]
　WANG Xiao-si.The Effect Comparison of Low-position Small Incision and Traditional Thyroid Surgery in the Treatment of Benign Thyroid Tumors[J].Medical Information,2021,34(07):145.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.20.038]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01